@aral Yeah I was a bit suspicious of it from the beginning with their using soapbox. Obviously that shows they're people that have paid absolutely zero attention to the meta or the population they wish to work with etc Whenever you see the words “ads”, “cryptocurrency”, “blockchain”, “web 3”, or “AI”, just replace them with “farts” and you’ll know whether you want them or not. “Can the fediverse survive without farts?” Yes, perfectly well. “Will farts replace people?” I hope not. “The European Commission embraces farts.” That’s unfortunate. “This new startup wants to improve your life with farts.” I’m good, thanks. #SiliconValley #BigTech #farts #buzzword #bullshit #ads #adtech #blockchain #ai #web3 If you’re developing web sites that only run in Google Chrome, you are not a web developer, you’re a web destroyer. #google #chrome #WebIntegrityAPI #WebDRM #web #dev #SiliconValley #adtech #PeopleFarming #SurveillanceCapitalism
Show previous comments
I'm having Old-guy flashbacks to IE specific code and Netscape Navigator.... *shudders*
Show previous comments
@aral Yep. Cut off access to information and then they will probably initiate a PragerU curriculum... Kids won't know anything other than ultra conservative dogma. Scary. @aral @aral The conservatives attack on the 'right to read' is apparently following the pattern of the attack on the right to an abortion: close the local brick &. morter facilities, then attack the online access to supplies. Laws requiring personal identification to access adult web sites can easily be used for stopping access to banned books at online libraries also. #libraries #ConservativesReallyAreThatBad Elon Musk: “And now, I will literally piss in people’s faces…” Mainstream media: - Five health benefits of urine
Show previous comments
Basically, what we’re saying to people today is: You’re interested in tech and you want a nice home (or just any home) and stability? Go work at Google, Facebook, or some other surveillance capitalist. What’s that? You want to work on free and open source? Sure, go work at IBM or Oracle… Oh… you don’t mean enterprise software? Tech to protect human rights/democracy? Not for profit hippie-dippie crap for the common good? Oh, then suffer. I mean, is it any surprise things are as they are?
Show previous comments
@aral This resonates even from over here on the marketing/content side of things. Sure you can work for a nonprofit, but they'll expect you to do the jobs of four or five people for a "salary" that only someone with a trust fund, or a partner working at Google, can live on. @aral it's just the social media version that movie Cube 100 million people who just wanted to see Kim Kardashian's latest butt foundation blending tip for bikini season woke up with a bunch of strangers trapped together in a box blasting brand ads like a Yodobashi Camera store while chainsaws come out of the ceiling
Show previous comments
@aral @fosstodon probably because your ideas are close to communism and speak to communists like me and others? 😂 beeep, beeep, anticommunist alarm! ⚠️ @aral @fosstodon Maybe no one told the Fosstodon admins that because you're a human rights activist/privacy advocate who wakes up and works at a not-for-profit on free and open software every day that their rules just don't apply to you and you can say and do whatever you like and they can't ever do anything or risk your ire? If the #fediverse is worth something I belive is for advocacy for or against something NOT for perusing censure of different points of views. Any server or instance that promote censure of reasonable point of views is in the wrong place. Needless to say that racism, nazism or misogyny is NOT a point of view.
Show previous comments
@aral @fedora
Show previous comments
@aral I am almost certain the meetings and NDA part was stupid fwarmongering but it still keep spreading, somethimes the open source community sucks!!! I started on the Fediverse with Mastodon about seven years ago when I had ~42K followers on Twitter and zero here. Personally, I don’t care how many followers I lose. My tiny, ineffectual, instance of one will defederate with any instance, no matter how large, if this rumour is true. If this comes to pass, I’d urge those of you on the instances that become Meta’s lackeys to move to instances that are not if you’d like us to stay in touch. Remember, it’s about quality not quantity. Always. You know what, don’t @ me if you‘re going to defend Facebook joining the fediverse or whatnot. Seriously, I’m not here to debate you. I’m sick and tired of pointing out the obvious. Do what you like. There’s a reason I’m building something that’s actually decentralised. It would just be nice to have the stopgap in place long enough to serve as a bridge. Oh, and if the largest servers don’t end up blocking Facebook/Meta, a boycott will not work. I’ve said my piece. Over and out. Myth: The #Fediverse™ Is Decentralised™ I run my own #Mastodon instance just for myself. An instance of one. What does that mean on today’s fediverse? It means I’m on mastodon.social. What? That makes no sense! Let me explain: Since I have my own instance, surely I decide who I follow and anyone can follow me, right? Wrong. For ~1M accounts, Eugen decides. If he blocks my instance, a large number of people who follow me today will no longer be able to. So I may as well be on his server. The same goes for other large servers. Look at how many of the people you interact with are on the handful of the largest servers and imagine that just those handful of servers blocked your server. Come, let‘s take this further… Apparently Facebook/Meta is “joining” the fediverse. How nice of them. Now imagine that the largest instance is run by Zuckerberg. (Or <insert your favourite Silicon Valley billionaire here>.) Imagine they become large enough to do the same thing to mastodon.social… “Hey, some fediverse instances are growing larger and larger, isn’t that great? Yay!” Stop and think about what this means. You’re celebrating the creation of fiefdoms and feudal lords. Mini Zuckerbergs, if you will. There’s a reason I’ve been shouting from the rooftops about limiting server sizes for as long as I can remember. e.g., If mastodon.social blocks my instance of one, they block 1,196,910 accounts from interacting with me. If I block them… I do the exact same thing to myself.
Show previous comments
@aral perhaps there is a need for a kind of small instance pact towards blocking when one of them is served with a unjustified block. With enough critical mass they'd have to think twice before doing it. Some fediverse instance admins: “How cool, Meta invited us to the adult table.” Yes, they did. Because you’re what’s for dinner. #fediverse #mastodon #meta #Project92 #BigTech #SiliconValley #SurveillanceCapitalism
Show previous comments
Whenever someone tells you that the climate crisis is a personal responsibility issue, show them this: The climate crisis is a billionaires crisis, a trillion-dollar corporations crisis, a capitalism crisis, a systemic inequality crisis. #climateChange #climateCrisis #climateCatastrophe #climate #corporatocracy #capitalism
Show previous comments
@aral both those things are true - while it is a billionaires crisis, it is also a personal responsibility crisis - those companies are delivering good and services mostly to the billion or so people in the global middle class (income eg. US$20000-300000 annually). As long as we pay them, they'll continue to do it |
@aral exit-oriented startup
vc-funded startup
anything but letting Them keep the word
@aral 100% agree. If it's VC funded, it's better to assume it's going to be shit sooner rather than later.