Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Aral Balkan

Do I want it?

Is it by a startup?

No.

(A ‘startup’ is not just any new small business. It’s a temporary venture capital funded company that must either fail fast or exit. An exit is where you’re either bought by Big Tech or become Big Tech through an IPO. To understand this better, if you have a sustainable small company, a startup is what will put you out of business.)

#startups #SiliconValley #ventureCapital #vc #SurveillanceCapitalism #PeopleFarming

39 comments
tok 🕊️

@aral Is this a generally accepted meaning of 'startup'? I always thought the term refers to any type of new company, but have no clue.

Aral Balkan

@t0k People do, wrongly, use it to refer to any type of new company. And that’s just great as far as Silicon Valley and venture capitalists are concerned. They know what a real startup is but if there sustainable, ethical companies that self-identify using the term, that’s great for the brand. They can turn to those and say ‘look, not all startups are toxic, extractive, exploitative ventures…’ So it helps them a lot in resisting regulation…

Aral Balkan

@t0k … But would they ever invest a single cent in such a company? No, never.

If you want to know what is and what isn’t a real startup, just look at what Silicon Valley and venture capitalists invest in and what they don’t.

tok 🕊️

@aral Thanks for the explanation! That's actually good to know.
Is there some better naming for a "new small company" which will stay small?

Aral Balkan

@t0k I quite like calling them “stay ups.” :)

Sumana Harihareswara

@aral @t0k As I mentioned to @gvwilson when he asked a similar question (the other responses there may also interest you):

social.coop/@brainwane/1108940

"zebras" is a term some folks are using.

Sven Slootweg

@t0k @aral I would just call those "small businesses", or "sustainable businesses", depending on the context.

Marty Fouts

@t0k @aral No it is not. “Fail fast or exit” is far more restrictive than what happens in practice and leaves out profitability as a path. Startups either fail, the more common case, or evolve into profitable companies; but even failures can involve multiple rounds of financing extending over many years.

Aral Balkan

PS. They won’t necessarily put you out of business because they have a better product or anything like that. They will put you out of business because they have a minimum of $5 million to burn to undercut you and starve you out.

#startups #SiliconValley #ventureCapital #vc #SurveillanceCapitalism #PeopleFarming

Alex Lee

@aral I think you'll find people who disagree with this. What about bootstrappers?

Aral Balkan

@alee What about them? A real startup will happily put them out of business too.

Dan Jacob

@aral it's "price dumping" that in practice is rarely enforced although is often illegal.

For example in the UK maybe 20 years ago supermarkets would pretty much charge pennies for bread to put local bakeries out of business, then jack up the prices once the competition was wiped out.

Aral Balkan

@danjac Yeah, it’s hard to compete with “free.”

Sibshops

@aral I've worked at 4 startup tech companies. They didn't do this.

In my experience, they usually get private investors.

Are you trying to reinvent "startup company" to mean something else?

Ariel C.G.

@aral you forgot the part where you burn money to attract more users while killing possible competitors, and then raising your prices to try and make some profit (spoiler: many times you don't). See any startup that offered a killer free tier and when everyone started using it they enshittified it and made it more expensive, while locking you in making it hard (or impossible) to take your data somewhere else.

But guess we'll never learn as a society to not trust companies that lose money on purpose...

@aral you forgot the part where you burn money to attract more users while killing possible competitors, and then raising your prices to try and make some profit (spoiler: many times you don't). See any startup that offered a killer free tier and when everyone started using it they enshittified it and made it more expensive, while locking you in making it hard (or impossible) to take your data somewhere else.

Aral Balkan

@arielcg That was the bit I was referring to with ‘To understand this better, if you have a sustainable small company, a startup is what will put you out of business.’ :)

But yes, exactly that.

Jeremy Kahn

@arielcg @aral

All the lessons from folklore about faerie markets

apply triple to venture capital

"don't accept gifts or eat the food; trades will always turn out to have a catch; you'll probably end up a slave to the Fair People"

Tom

@arielcg @aral

That's not the worst part, they don't even have to make a profit later. They just burn capital to keep prices low, put enough competitors out of business to make the IPO/sale attractive then cash out to the rubes who bought their BS.

After that, why should they give a shit? The VC/founder business model NEVER has to work long term for the players to win big.

Ariel C.G.

@Tallish_Tom @aral yeah, but you need to at least "make the effort" to make the IPO and that someone is interested. See Reddit's (poor) attempt at it by killing third party tools or making them pay insane amounts; and all the ads and gift-thingys they show you.

Tom

@arielcg @aral

Yeah I mean stings are _hard_. That's why they make good movies 😄.

Ben Cox

@Tallish_Tom @arielcg @aral & many of the rubes are the employees.

(Equity compensation is wage theft. Pass it on!)

Michael Roberts

@Tallish_Tom @arielcg @aral - Working or thinking long-term is actually seen as a negative.

Rob Landley

@Tallish_Tom @arielcg @aral It also grinds up founders who WANT to make a sustainable business but are naieve enough to take VC funding.

You could be profitable at 6 people (like a dental practice) but have to hire 20 in a big office to show "growth". So you overshoot your revenue and must pursue a second and third round of VC funding.

Teaching someone to swim by giving them a 500 pound scuba tank with a second tank on the bottom of the ocean. Keeping your head above water vs go straight down.

Glitzersachen.de

@arielcg @aral
no no, the part "the part where you burn money to attract more users while killing possible competitors" should read "the part where you burn money to summon a venture capitalist from the dungeon dimension". The pentagram on the floor is not optional.

Antranig Vartanian :freebsd:

@aral that's not the definition of a startup. many startups are not VC funded.

A Startup is a new small business with the potential to grow big.

Aral Balkan

@antranigv Thank you for mainstreamplaining that to me. I very much appreciate your effort.

Matthew Graybosch
@antranigv You're arguing from a dictionary definition. @aral is arguing from how startups generally work in the real world.
Bjornsdottirs

@aral exit-oriented startup

vc-funded startup

anything but letting Them keep the word

Bjornsdottirs

@aral It has. They should be denied the use of the term.

Eric Schultz

@aral 100% agree. If it's VC funded, it's better to assume it's going to be shit sooner rather than later.

Go Up