Work-wise, little worries me more at the moment than:
Could you review this quickly, please, Neil? Iโve used ChatGPT, so just a brief once-over, please.
Iโve become quite good at explaining that, yes, of course, Iโll happily do so, but that it will cost at least the same, and probably more, and will take longer, than if theyโd given me the instructions and let me do it from scratch, because I essentially need to do that first, and then look at however many pages of machine sludge.
@neil my general experience is that the only way to know if a short generated email by chatGPT is appropriate is still to consider what I would actually write/explain and then compare to what chatgpt said. At that point I could have just written the email myself.
@neil Happily this hasn't happened to me yet. Although I have had several vendors on the other side proudly present terms that were clearly created by an LLM. And yes, it takes *ages* to sort them out and make them fit for purpose.
I'm not that young, but far from grey still. sometimes I think about it, but when I see all that BS about "inclusive pronouns", cocks in open projects. etc I get sick and definitely don't wanna step into this all. no way. if it was about code quality, hunting down complicated quirks and bugs, making software better and more stable, doing hardcore optimization and so on I could help. I have over 30 years of C/C++ development of network server software and hardware, real-time and high-load things. but I can't stand at python and keep strict suckless priniciples in software. if FOSS needs a serious developer that won't cancel RMS or somebody else for their look, or speech, for personal opinions or whatwever - I can help. but if they're sick leftists busy with changing logo "to show more community something" like Apache does at the moment - this is not my cup of shit. I don't play that games. I'm all about "show me your code" principle, really interested in making software fast and robust. but I'm totally not interested in socializing, banging around with non code-related issues and writing shitware. I cannot stand enshittification that happens all around. I'm purist and that's it.
I'm not that young, but far from grey still. sometimes I think about it, but when I see all that BS about "inclusive pronouns", cocks in open projects. etc I get sick and definitely don't wanna step into this all. no way. if it was about code quality, hunting down complicated quirks and bugs, making software better and more stable, doing hardcore optimization and so on I could help. I have over 30 years of C/C++ development of network server software and hardware, real-time and high-load things....
โโMy whole library is wiped outโ: what it means to own movies and TV in the age of streaming servicesโ
It doesnโt mean anything at all, because you donโt own anything.
The language of ownership, or of buying something, is misleading.
Similarly, if you are running/storing something locally but it handcuffs it DRM or communication with someone elseโs online server, you should be told this very clearly up front.
โโMy whole library is wiped outโ: what it means to own movies and TV in the age of streaming servicesโ
It doesnโt mean anything at all, because you donโt own anything.
The language of ownership, or of buying something, is misleading.
Similarly, if you are running/storing something locally but it handcuffs it DRM or communication with someone elseโs online server, you should be told this very clearly up front.
@neil I once had the notion, as a property law academic, that fragmentation of copyright interests should be constrained in the same way that restrictive covenants are supervised by the courts. There was a member of staff at (IIRC) Berkeley with similar ideas. But things have moved on so far now, making reasoned arguments about ยฉ๏ธ is like dissecting a train wreck after it's happened. It's like, go ahead guys, when the whole thing collapses I hope some of us can find enough food to keep us alive.
@neil crashlytics which used to be under twitter's fabric (now under google's firebase) used to have a page in their docs telling you how to set up a dialog asking the user whether they want metric collection or not. there was a warning saying most users would choose no, so it is advised to not show the dialog at all.
Technology ... has always been political. Iโve very little time for discussions which try to separate โtechโ and โpoliticsโ.
The same is true with licensing models.
Over the last couple of years, Iโve seen more people talking about โethical licensingโ. And, while Iโve yet to see an โethical licenceโ come up in the course of my work, I thought it might be an interesting topic for a blog post.
@neil Patents and licenses may provide the economic representation of hardware requirements and supreme values of the dominant conception of knowledge and ethics in the context of the Internet.
@neil it's easy, you just make a bunch of deployments, services, ingresses, roles/rolebindings, and loadbalancers with special annotation depending on which cloud provider you're using (or just ingresses if you're using ingress-nginx), and then you package that up into a helm chart, and you put a bunch of helm charts together into a helmfile and deploy that with gitops using fluxcd, ensuring you keep variables straight between deployment environments
what could go wrong
@neil it's easy, you just make a bunch of deployments, services, ingresses, roles/rolebindings, and loadbalancers with special annotation depending on which cloud provider you're using (or just ingresses if you're using ingress-nginx), and then you package that up into a helm chart, and you put a bunch of helm charts together into a helmfile and deploy that with gitops using fluxcd, ensuring you keep variables straight between deployment environments
My blog posts, into which I put considerable time and effort, and which (sometimes) contain material not covered elsewhere, are probably part of commercial LLM training data.
Does that comply with the licence? No.
Does it infringe copyright? Probably, IMHO, from an English law perspective. Other jurisdictions, YMMV.
Is this "stealingโ or โtheftโ? No. I get that this is an emotive topic, absolutely, but I thought we had moved beyond โcopyright infringement is theftโ 15+ years ago.
An "open firmware" project, where people produce and share FOSS firmware for common household devices, replacing the manufacturer's firmware with a decrapified version.
A smart TV? Reflash it with FOSS firmware, which removes tracking, calls to the manufacturer's servers, and any Internet-connected services that you don't want?
A printer? It's now yours. No ink subscription, or need for an app to print remotely.
In this blogpost, Iโll show you how to use OBS - a fantastic FOSS audio and video mixer - to inject your own adverts into your video call streams, so that you too can offer people the chance to pay you ยฃ3/month to turn off adverts in your calls with them.
You can do partial ads (in the corner of the screen), interstitials, full screen video replacement, and scrolling subtitle ads.
@neil I can see possibilities in hardware was well. "Please present a valid credit card if you would prefer not to be struck by this vehicle for the next 30 days or 15 encounters, whichever comes first."
@neil@organicmaps Strongly seconded! And wonderful that it works just as well without any 'Net connection.
It's even more brilliant when overlaid with GPX/KML route-traces downloaded from https://waymarkedtrails.org/
@neil
Well, I used to give this another anatomic nameโฆ
Just think about something you have to play with a finger, most of the times, people have difficulties finding and using itโฆ Starts with a C
@neil I was "forced" to deGoogle my phone because I have a Huawei, and let me tell you it's an absolute pain in the ass. The "big" apps all work fine, but all the small, local administrative stuff don't. The transportation app didn't work. The health insurance app doesn't work. The delivery app doesn't detect my location. Payment app entered captcha loop.
@neil ๐๐ปโโ๏ธ๐๐ปโโ๏ธ i'm a bit late to the party, but use krystal instead of google domains.
source: i used google domains from march 2021 (simply because it was easy to use and affordable for me, a person with a visual arts/design background, and a pinch of technical knowhow at the time), and had to move from there when they announced that they were closing down and selling their assets to squarespace. i landed on krystal because they're a small(ish) sustainable company in the uk, and they also offer hosting as well (i'm not paid by them to say this, i'm just saying it from my own experience)
@neil ๐๐ปโโ๏ธ๐๐ปโโ๏ธ i'm a bit late to the party, but use krystal instead of google domains.
source: i used google domains from march 2021 (simply because it was easy to use and affordable for me, a person with a visual arts/design background, and a pinch of technical knowhow at the time), and had to move from there when they announced that they were closing down and selling their assets to squarespace. i landed on krystal because they're a small(ish) sustainable company in the uk, and they also...
@neil my general experience is that the only way to know if a short generated email by chatGPT is appropriate is still to consider what I would actually write/explain and then compare to what chatgpt said. At that point I could have just written the email myself.
@neil
This brings to mind Pauli's review of a particularly poor physics paper: "It's not even wrong."
@neil Happily this hasn't happened to me yet. Although I have had several vendors on the other side proudly present terms that were clearly created by an LLM. And yes, it takes *ages* to sort them out and make them fit for purpose.