Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Aral Balkan

Thinking more people are going to engage with you on mainstream social media “because everyone’s there” is like thinking people at a stadium concert are there to listen to you. It‘s only true if you’re one of the ones on stage. Not so much when you’re huddled in the nosebleeds.

Forget the numbers. Forget about “going viral” (leave it to the psychopaths in Silicon Valley to make virus-like behaviour aspirational). Embrace the joy of interacting with one another on a human scale.

#ThinkSmall

176 comments
Aris Teon

@aral so true. This is one of the most common misconceptions about corporate social media.

INPC

@aral I like that analogy. Although as a sound engineer, they are sort of listening to me haha.

Daniel Yeo

@aral I totally hear what you're saying and agree wholeheartedly.

But as I reeducate my social media reflexes here, and revaluating my engagement on Twitter - I'm wondering whether it would be better to export new behaviours back into that world rather than turn away? Lots of internal conflict about this concept...

Aral Balkan

@yukinosaru You can’t export behaviours into that world. It’s a top-down, not bottom-up, world driven by venture capitalists chasing exponential growth and profits investing in the most extractive and exploitative means possible of obtaining them. It’s a corporate world of CEO kings where their word is law. That world is what it is. Not you nor anyone else can change it. It’s like asking factory farms to be kinder. They can’t. It’s their nature to be cruel. (All they can hope for is better PR.)

Daniel Yeo

@aral yes, I hear and see that. But sadly it's not going away. It is top down but it is we are also still the content. And in many ways its a mirror to the duality of mankind.
So the question I'm asking myself is to walk away, keep your hands clean and hope it dies. Or. Infiltrate, poison the data pool, switch the dynamic up?
Perhaps I'm just hopelessly naive here but is there no hope in the kinder human nature?

dmhindle

@yukinosaru @aral I have great hope in a kinder human nature, both because it is the only way we will survive and because our own society shows a halting and uneven evolution in that direction. But the many people who feel they benefit from the current systems of power and privilege are not going to change and they are going to fight changes to the systems they depend on. Unlike our planet, we can leave the world of Twitter to create a better one.

Aral Balkan

@yukinosaru I mean, by all means if you want to infiltrate/sabotage that system, go for it. Sabotage is the only legitimate means of changing such a system from the inside (but I’m not necessarily convinced of its long-term effectiveness).

Personally, I prefer to create. To work on alternatives. To try and help build the kind of world I want to live in.

I’ve railed against that system long enough and let me tell you, it’s a soul-destroying affair. I still call it out but my focus is creating.

Eirliani A Rahman

@aral @yukinosaru Beautifully said, Aral. Yes, there is much value in creating indeed.

Daniel Yeo

@aral I'm not really advocating for sabotage, I've muddled two thought streams there. My main point is that I do find that there is still value there and I'm questioning whether and how my own behaviour has contributed to the toxicity and how I might do things differently.

I too believe that creation is the better choice and I've also tried to build and live the world that I want to see, although in a different domain. Interrogating my own instincts and behaviours is part of my growth journey.

Dave Lane 🇳🇿

@aral @yukinosaru agreed - trying to change a broken system from within generally sees the idealists who go into it with that aim (to justify the pangs of conscience felt when taking such highly remunerated roles) ground down & recast as a rationalising apologist, redefining 'good' so that it includes them and their behaviour. Extreme cognitive dissonance. I've seen it many times over the last 20 years. The system sabotages idealists with far greater certainty than idealists sabotage the system.

FinchHaven

@yukinosaru @aral

"Or. Infiltrate, poison the data pool, switch the dynamic up?"

Oh, please

Stop dreaming

You and what Seven Nation Army is going to generate enough tweet volume to "poison the data pool, switch the dynamic up?"

You're only helping #ElonMusk to bail out a sinking ship

catjungle

@FinchHaven @yukinosaru @aral @flyswatter If no one is there, it won't be relevant. If everyone with a conscience just left, it would be Truth Social within a month. It's so easy to migrate the whole operation here. I don't understand why people don't just do it. They have to stay and enrich Elon and the fascists and keep him and his "own the conversation" relevant. They can't be inconvenienced in the slightest. They are complicit.

WTF

@aral @yukinosaru I feel you but candidly most don’t give a sh*t.

myrmepropagandist

@aral

At 4am in NYC I wake up to catch the early bus. When I'd look at twitter at that hour it was totally filled with all these students and scientists and nurses from Nigeria-- They are already at work and in class and taking about the news, papers, jokes. And I made friends that way too. I learned new things.

That's the power of a network with 100s of millions of people.

Jon

@futurebird @aral yep. I've made lots of friends on Twitter and Facebook -- and reconnected with old acquaintances as well. There are plenty of good critiques of Twitter, FB, and surveillance capitalism-based social networks ... but this is not one.

CheckingInOcassionally

@yukinosaru @aral
"I totally hear what you're saying and agree wholeheartedly.

But..."

(😂 Sorry - couldn't resist)

Apples and pears.

The birdsite defers to its alley cat's rhythms;
It scavenges and ravages with tacit algorithms

It prowls and scowls, spraying most foul.
Loudest of all are meowing howls

Hashtag edits:
#birdsite #twitter #poem #poetry

@yukinosaru @aral
"I totally hear what you're saying and agree wholeheartedly.

But..."

(😂 Sorry - couldn't resist)

Apples and pears.

The birdsite defers to its alley cat's rhythms;
It scavenges and ravages with tacit algorithms

It prowls and scowls, spraying most foul.
Loudest of all are meowing howls

Daniel Yeo

@CheckingInOcassionally @aral that first line is genuine. I do agree, but I'm genuinely asking myself the question. Playing devil's advocate to myself is important to see behind my own paradigm.

It's too easy to blame the site and its overlords. But ultimately aren't "we the people" the content providers. Can't we become more savvy to the dark forces and nurture different ones?

Daniel Yeo

@CheckingInOcassionally @aral

I think this question matter more than we might think because it's a microcosm of the real world challenges that we face. Except we don't have an alternative to migrate to...

CheckingInOcassionally

@yukinosaru @aral
You might be overthinking;

The alternative to migrate to is called Life.
There's more of that here, whereas by design, the birdsite is more like playing a role in a spectator sport, which is also part of life, - as an option only

FinchHaven

@yukinosaru @aral

Any activity -- any activity at all -- that you drive back *into* #Twitter benefits one and one person only

Want to guess who?

#ElonMusk

Period

Full stop

#Musk needs the traffic volumes and replies and likes to pump up #Twitter's stats to dupe advertisers into maybe sticking around

You're just helping Musk bail water out of an otherwise sinking ship

Stop trying to overthink it

ekes

@yukinosaru @aral

The main purpose of the fediverse is decentralization and unentanglement of paying a service with your self-determination.
It's the commitment to a standard protocol like SMS or E-Mail - rather than centralized enclosures not just an entire country but the world has to rely on.
The fediverse doesn't guarantee you quality of life or security but ensures and enables control, competition, and flexibility with the right balance of social accountability.

Pensive™️

@ekes @yukinosaru @aral
IMHO it is the decentralized nature and (perhaps more important) it’s lack of an algorithm tuned to promote strife and argument for the view counts.
If you disagree with how your moderators are moderating (😈) you can change servers. There is no way to change the algorythms. I’m wierd though in that I subscribe to the “keep your enemies closer” theory. I’m keeping my bird account open. Sometimes it has more recent news.

ekes

@PensiveTM @yukinosaru @aral
Nothing stands against an instance offering additional, payed analytical and processing services, though.

The key is you can leave without giving up on your circle and other instances can block them if they misbehave.

WTF

@yukinosaru @aral Most people still are on Twitter and now Mastadon, Post, Tribel etc.

heracl.es

@aral Hear hear. Now we need design to embed these differences onto the small scale social media, get rid of performance metrics, funnels, drips.

John Samuel

@heracles @aral I guess that this is a dilemma for every writer (or content creator). Either they choose to write what they think or they choose what their readers like to hear (or read). Getting rid of "performance" metrics (as you suggest) is one way forward to help those who prefer the former. But disabling them will also play an important role in avoiding "going viral".

Tammy Garrison

@aral it’s been more emotionally fulfilling to have real conversations with people. I still miss the dopamine hits from a popular post, but who doesn’t like a sudden rush? This is more sustaining over the long run, though.

Maciej J. Hajduk :terminal:

@aral
I still can't understand why people care about number of followers (ok, on Twitch abd YT this can give you money - fine). I'm happy as I followed cool people and now my feed is cool too.
Quality over quantity

Tony

@aral surely the point of social media is to be social. I post for interaction not popularity.

Karin Sorenby

@aral so true! What matters here is that we are a community that are talking and listening to each other. And everyone of us matters….☺️🙏

John Godsland

@aral Agreed. I've had more valuable conversations and interaction here in a couple of months than I had over years at the birdsite.

John Samuel

@gozzy @aral It's surprising that a website with similar features supports more interactions than the other. (also speaking from my personal experience)

Missing The Point

@aral This post is really doing numbers, congrats!

glenng802

@aral

The "engage with influencers" mindset has led to a copious flow of gratuitous pandering. I gave up on the other sites because it was too painful to watch.

Szilvia

@aral Exactly. And in either case, if thousands of people like or comment on your tweet it's actually really tedious looking at all the notifications 😆 . It's not as much fun as people imagine.

Ravi ☮️

@aral I had this idea but was loking for this analogy since long. Popular social media like Twitter or Instagram just makes me wanna share lesser. Also a very opposite example, reddit.

Scott M. Stolz
@Aral Balkan  It's the difference between "I want to be famous" and "I want to be part of a community."  

In the past, forums and discussion groups were great for building communities, but were not federated, so they had limited reach. We also had blogs and RSS feeds but you needed SEO to be seen. Then social media appeared and gave everyone a soapbox to stand on, and people shouted into the wind hoping people will notice.

Now, we have an interesting opportunity to bring back communities and blogs, except federated this time. Hopefully we can marry the best of both worlds, and avoid bringing over the more toxic design elements.
@Aral Balkan  It's the difference between "I want to be famous" and "I want to be part of a community."  

In the past, forums and discussion groups were great for building communities, but were not federated, so they had limited reach. We also had blogs and RSS feeds but you needed SEO to be seen. Then social media appeared and gave everyone a soapbox to stand on, and people shouted into the wind hoping...
Siroj42

@aral And things can still go "viral" on the fediverse - just in the way that term actually suggests: They spread from person to person through social interaction, not through an algorithm suggesting posts. You know, like viruses do?

littlebigfred

@aral "In the seating area very high up in a stadium or theater, as for a sporting event, musical performance, play, etc., which typically costs less money but has a restricted view. "Nosebleed" refers jocularly to one effect of extremely high altitudes on the body, nasal hemorrhaging."

Aral Balkan

@Irisherself I was as happy with a handful here in 2016. (And equally fine with leaving the 42K+ “followers” I had when I closed the hell-site account.) The number here ballooned up quite a bit during the migration. Was far less for the majority of the last six years.

In fact, I’d be very happy if Mastodon hid the numbers altogether. I think that would be a positive. I’ve already hidden by follower/following lists but I can’t hide the numbers.

iris ✿ sandwalker

@aral it wasn't a pick on you, I just had to giggle a bit :D I too left a large crowd behind at the bird place (did not redirect anyone), and even left another instance here which turned a bit foul... I agree the social aspect is about the connections you make, in the moment, and diversify your impressions and interactions... let's just all chat with each other and no one will feel left behind <3 :toot:

Random Geek
@aral @Irisherself and I’m at least two or three of those followers, what with being active on multiple instances.

The numbers are even more meaningless here than they are on the big centralized platforms.
InSearchOf

@aral

I agree. And I'm trying to do more commenting vs just liking and boosting. It's the human interaction that appealed to me when I first joined the fediverse. I actually get acknowledgment when I post here. The other place felt like posting to a void or echo chamber. I fell into the bad habit of just retweeting since my own stuff was rarely acknowledged.

JamesT

@aral Well said during the 80's with bbs we only cared about building relationships and creating solutions to problems, now its all ego centric based.

Nemo_bis 🌈

@aral The difference is that people eventually come out of a stadium and you can distribute flyers to them on the public street. The walled gardens are careful to not let anyone out.

sharon linne faulk

@aral Going with this metaphor, most people would prefer to listen in a smaller venue. I prefer to listen at home. 😏

Herbi :coffefied:

@aral This is a great explanation and spot on!

I would have made excuses a few months ago, before breaking the addiction.

bernardo_olafson

@aral Exactly. Well put. It took me some time to figure out that I mostly enjoy the company of other people in small numbers. I shine in 1on1 conversations. I suck in groups. I am fine with this by now.

StuartB

@aral
I responded to a Toot last night, and the end result was insane - loafs of follows, loads of faves, loads of boosts...
Loads of stress as well, wondering if those people were going to expect all my posts to be that insightful.

JPhoto

@aral totally agree on this. I’ve been on Mastondon for a few weeks and had actual real interactions. Not interactions for the sake of follows or not replies like birdsite or what Instagram turned into. So much better.

Toni Aittoniemi

@aral Somehow this rings true with my impression of Native American values before the Eurasians came.

They abandoned empire after empire to live small. Each time they improved their administrative & power systems of power a bit so the next empire wouldn’t be able to create so much warfare or amass as much power.

(This was achieved through legends, tales of the birth of the people, and art, as they didn’t write.)

Toni Aittoniemi

@aral Also though. We need to still acknowledge the bad actors are touching at something primal in the human psyche.

The will to power will always be there.

But if that will has creative outlets that do good instead of bad, then we can be more secure as community.

Leaders being able to use their power to amass more power is the critical point. Mechanisms to throttle this are paramount.

Ceremonial power is another option. Reduce the actual power, but let them have the illusion

eridium

@aral As the current article in my news section talks about, I wish personal blogging was still a thing, I'd love to connect with more people with similar interests more. Probably why I'm on reddit so much lol

Matthias Rex 🦣

@aral None of the funny or brilliant things I've tweeted over the years has ever made me go "viral." I got 7,000 likes on a comment once and never gained a single follower. It's better to make our social media presences about the people, places, and things that we love, our hobbies and interests, and the causes we believe in.

Uncle Harvey

@aral yes yes. I for one, am here for the social. To talk of my day, my daily doin's n thoughts n feelins and chatting with others about theirs.
Not for news for sure. Y'all never heard of news aggregates?
Nor to stroll through a flee market of people hawking there various "wares".
Come on folks. Be people, be human and neighborly n just do more just chitchat.
Just saying...🤔

Linda

@aral Thank you for saying this. Forget the numbers!

Waseem

@aral this is exactly what is keeping people on Facebook and Twitter.
Personally I had to reach out to my phone company and my first thinking was to tweet by tagging to get attention and resolution for the problem.

Adam Crain

@aral

This was my approach on Twitter when I was on it...engage one on one with people. Trying to convey an idea to just one person. It got hard when you kept realizing I could just be talking to a bot...

ErUpNorth

@aral Despite not having many followers and not posting much I have had more interaction with different people on here than was happening on the bird site.

Yahia Lababidi

@aral Fitting that this post should be popular :)

I have nearly 10k followers between Facebook & Twitter, but finding it rewarding to discover my tribe, one by one (only 80 friends, here, so far)

#introduction #NewHere

worldliteraturetoday.org/autho

Pino Carafa

@aral I certainly agree with your opinion on "going viral", but I'm not sure about "thinking small" in general. Personally I couldn't care less about becoming some kind of online celebrity. No thanks. But I do want to engage with many people with shared interests worldwide. In that sense I'm "thinking big", and I would be happy as a small fish in a big pond.

CheckingInOcassionally

@rozeboosje @aral
Mostly, when I see "think small", I'm reminded of something someone called Greta once said. 😔

DocPlaya

@aral I actually like it when I see small repost and like numbers. It makes me feel like I am one of the few that was able to witness the information.

Sheila Blackadder

@aral

I'm not sure I want to be the guy appealing to the masses anyway; I think I'd feel like I messed up along the way somewhere 🤔

C. R. Collins

@aral

I get much more engagement here. But I don't think of it as "engagement," rather good conversations. I've read the most interesting posts since I've joined here.

Asuzara

@aral Totally agreed! I specifically turned off all the numbers on here and didn't tell my following of other sites about my presence. I want this to feel like an organic experience and growth with people who seem interesting.

Melissa

@aral and small things and interactions make a big difference!

Tvan

@aral a man after my own heart! I have not looked at my bird account in a long time. Too repulsed to even login to delete it.

L192

@aral I always found it didn't matter how big mainstream social media was, due to the nature of algorithms and monetisation I could never communicate to anyone really outside of my own real life friendship groups.

New to this app, have to see if this is any better.

CheckingInOcassionally

@aral
Given the substantial number of replies you've received it may be time for an appropriate musical interlude
youtube.com/watch?v=0IH0VO1tGY
#music

Chelle :coffefiedgreen:

@aral I honestly think in my short time here at masto I've had more conversations with folks than the last 3+ yrs on twitter.

Alice Marshall

@aral if you are trying to publicize an incident of police brutality the ability to go viral is the point of the exercise.

Danetteb2

@aral the point of social media is, ostensibly, to engage. So if you’re waiting for others to engage with you then 🤷🏼‍♀️. You make friends by engaging with them- commenting, boosting, soon they’ll do the same for you. Otherwise, you’re just shouting into the void.

Frank Cote

@aral What a nicely written thing to say. Thank you.

william.maggos

@aral

I want everyone capable of going viral, just not via algorithms. The magic of micro blogging is that it finally enables mass attention democracy. The big companies are no longer the only ones with that power. Eventually, they all just become equal players on the network, not elevated to a special place cause they're a channel your cable network carries. Higher status in our heads needs to be earned. #MeritCulture

Raptor :jewish_pride_flag:

@aral I only "did numbers" on Twitter when I replied to large accounts. Otherwise, nobody engaged with my posts, not even mutuals. I didn't even realize how much a mutual of mine appreciated my work until we connected elsewhere (Discord).

Twitter is great for getting a message out (if you do things to be noticable) but not great for communities.

Bathsheba Blue

@aral
For the average Twitter user, there are no viral moments, bc small accounts are suppressed by design. For most, it’s like screaming into the void.

Quinn A.

@aral I had a post go viral on TiKTok a couple of times. It was nothing special. A fair amount of supportive and funny comments, but also a lot of annoying and hate filled ones. No real conversations. But I guess I’m also not on platforms to make a name for myself like an artist or writer may need to be for their career.

Royden

@aral I believe that I am duty bound to read your posts if I follow you, similarly for you. How can you do that with 100s of followers and posts?

Eilene

@aral
So wise. And so true. Human scale is really what we all need....

JSHVN

@aral couldn’t agree more! Better to engage with a few people than to be shouting into the void.

Elizabeth

@aral I love both Mastodon and Post for that reason. Meaningful interaction.

Aral Balkan

@avertexofmyown The difference between the two being that Post is part of the same-old Silicon Valley startup game that Twitter was too. (techcrunch.com/2022/11/28/post)

We know how that game goes:

1. Look at this lovely free service we have that does just what it says on the tin and nothing more. (Twitter didn’t even have an algorithmic timeline at the start.)

2. Grow exponentially (the only way to kill such a startup is to not use it and avoid this step)

3. Exit (get sold to a larger corp or IPO)

@avertexofmyown The difference between the two being that Post is part of the same-old Silicon Valley startup game that Twitter was too. (techcrunch.com/2022/11/28/post)

We know how that game goes:

1. Look at this lovely free service we have that does just what it says on the tin and nothing more. (Twitter didn’t even have an algorithmic timeline at the start.)

Beth

@aral

Great analogy!

I compare Twitter to a performance that has an element of audience participation. You may get called up on stage with a RT or QT, but most likely you simply remain in the audience watching others.

Melody Cooper

@aral AMEN. And there is incredible value in deeply interacting with 10 people who then interact with 10 others whether on social media or in real life, who then go on to share the seeds we plant. As the sister of the Central Park Birder and the one who posted the video that went viral to the tune of 50 million worldwide, I know the power and draw of going viral. But instead of creating one potted plant choked with viral roots, we can create groves that grow into healthy forests.

Andrew "Ace" Arsenault

@aral I've always gotten more engagement on Alt-Tech sites then Big-Tech.

Big-Tech has a problem with too much positive feedback in the algorithm, So unless you are playing the algorithm (producing the content the company wants you to make) you get no traction. : /

kcarruthers

@aral @bluebirdblvd the quality of the conversations here is much better and more human

Tuomas Tammisto

@aral Thank you.

Community building instead making things viral. (Like, the past few years we've seen stuff go viral, and it wasn't pretty...)

Accidental Resident (she/they)

@aral this post has gone the equivalent of fedi-viral!

tommy

@aral almost poetic. I will print this post and put it on my wall

Gytis Repečka

@aral That's what fediverse is all about 👍

B-Sizzle :mastodon:

@aral I have more followers and interactions with people in 6 weeks on this place than I did in 13 years on the other site.

myrmepropagandist

@aral

No. I will not think small. Absolutely not.

I could never be happy in a small social network. Not because I'm so wonderful and popular and everyone should listen to me, but rather small networks have fewer sub-groups.

200 people talking about math, but what about people talking about ants? 500? How much intersection? Large groups can contain more diverse subgroups. The stranger you are the bigger a network you will require.

Doug Bostrom

@futurebird @aral

This reminds me of a fairly harrowing period in my life, rearranging schedule for a public radio station.

Modernizing our schedule (existentially mandatory) needed "horizontal block" programming. Individual scattered hours of "special" content made this impossible.

There was a "woman's music" hour, each week. Easily found, more easily avoided. A ghetto of sorts.

Integration and embrace of "woman's music" into the entire schedule advanced everybody's cause. More for all.

Tom 🍃

@futurebird @aral I think the two approaches are reconcilable. "Human subcultures are nested fractally" so we need social networks that mirror this structure. Little clubs inside bigger networks inside an enormous super-structure!

Victoria De Capua

@futurebird @aral big fish, small pond syndrome is heavy here. They think niche = special, small = order, and uniformity = peace. It's a recipe for extremely lazy groupthink.

Richard

@aral honestly, I came from Twitter. Inviting Donald Trump to return was a red line.

Last night I found myself scrolling through Mastodon, and instead of being outraged, I was running across funny jokes, amazing photography, and a lot of nice people. It’s much more pleasant here, even with a fraction of the followers.

leap441

@prodygy @aral welcome to a strong and growing community.

Lainey Feingold

@aral I appreciate this post as I consider the impact on my brain, ego, goals, and time of possibly leaving behind my 8,000+ Twitter followers. At what cost and what value chasing those numbers here? #a11y.

Anne Roth

@aral I'm literally on social media because it allows me to do what I can't elsewhere: Get in touch with people I don't know from different parts of the world. Get to know people I didn't know.

Reading about things in different parts of the world that aren't considered to be 'real news' enough for regular media. I don't want to think small, totally the opposite actually.

Maybe this is not what you were thinking of but that's why I'm here.

Jon

@anneroth yeah really. It's interesting how few people are saying that in the replies though -- you, me, @futurebird @mnl and virtually nobody else. And all the boosting and "yes I agree" on this viral post by an influencer, with almost no interaction between commenters, is exactly what everybody's saying is bad about Twitter but (in their minds) doesn't happen here! 🤣🤣🤣

mnl mnl mnl mnl mnl

@jdp23 @anneroth @futurebird maybe it’s just an elaborate shitpost and we’re the fools

Jon

@mnl @anneroth @futurebird It's possible but I think he really believes that. There's a lot I agree with in ar.al/2020/08/07/what-is-the-s but there's also a lot of things I find important and valuable that aren't glossed over.

myrmepropagandist

@anneroth

Same, Anne.

It's so amazing to meet someone who is just living a totally different life. Find some common ground, help them or get some help, learn a little teach a little-- and it's not the start of a life-long friendship. It's just two people enriching each other through what they share-- and what they *don't* share.

That's why I keep coming back to social media as much as keeping in touch with "regulars" and people I've known for years.

PanicButton

@futurebird @anneroth I'm loving your posts, but, yeah, things can be very different.
I live out in the middle of nowhere. I have to drive 20 miles to reach a gas station. My grade school was consolidated and was still less than 100 kids for K-8!
But I get to see some of life in NYC through your posts, and it's fascinating.

Bob Calder

@futurebird @anneroth I lost people after G+ shut down even though they were on Twitter, they never showed up in my feed. Now they are reappearing and it's wonderful. Spotty but not awful.

Henry288

@aral For real ! Look at nature . . the bear standing by the salmon river isn't concerned but with one fish at a time ✋

Danatheone

@aral Working as a street act is something like this. You'll find your people, you'll get an audience, it will be intimate, meaningful, and spirited
Most of all it will be authentic
Along the way a few minds could be moved
Think small indeed— be sure to laugh

Aminda Khink

@dana @aral Gotra love a busker. Tash Sultana. 💗

thepoliticalcat

@aral I'd say "Think sustainable," which is similar, tho not entirely the same. We sustain each other in addition to ourselves. We are social creatures, without a network, we can't create much. We need not hierarchies of domination and rule, but lateral networks of co-operation and sharing.

DELETED

@aral Honestly, I get better engagement on my random posts here than I ever did on Twitter. It doesn't really matter, because I'm not trying to build a brand or establish an audience, I'm just a dude hanging out and posting whatever dumb thing I want to. But I have actually had some interesting conversations with people, as opposed to basically no one responding on Twitter or getting replies from just the people that want to start a fight with an internet stranger. lol

Ligma Johnson

@aral nothing wrong with being small. Everyone has to start somewhere.

That said, you probably have one of the biggest accounts that I've seen on here.

Aral Balkan

@ligma Indeed. And yet it is four orders of magnitude smaller than the most popular accounts on Twitter and one that’s grown over six years here (or 16 years if you consider that some folks migrated over with me from there, where I had ~42K followers, slowly built up since 2006). To wit, celebrities who migrated over flew past such numbers here in a day or two. Again, we’re talking orders of magnitude difference. (And I’d be the first to support hiding follower counts altogether.)

Ligma Johnson

@aral I wasn't complaining, I was just observing an interesting contrast.

Indeed, I find it rather admirable that despite having clearly one of the more popular accounts on this platform, you find the humility to care about the small.

The devil's in the details, or so they say, so perhaps we all really ought to pay more attention to those, to make sure he's got nowhere to hide.

Aral Balkan

@ligma Well I’ve kind of dedicated my life to “small” at this point :)

small-tech.org

79

@aral honestly this. It's why I never ended up sticking with the "major" ones like insta or Twitter. It's just yelling into the void.

Machine Grrrl

@aral I never understood how anyone can feel happiness over seeing people reduced to a bunch of numbers and considering that number a source of happiness when it is merely a bunch of random people you never met, never will talk to and who only see you as a number as well.

otso
@aral

just remember to ban anyone you disagree with
Michael
@aral I don't see it as a media source issue. I see it as a human issue. For me, I'm here to find people to have extended and weekly conversation with. Not to sell anything, not to find a mate, as I have one and am satisfied with her. No ulterior motives. Just human connection from outside my local sphere. But people, even here with the protection of distance, seem afraid to just chat. Fear of scams, and abusers is here. But the chance to find real and thoughtful and creative individuals is intriguing. The things that bother me are memes, one line remarks, they are like dogs pissing on a pole, for others to find. If ya ain't in it to make a human connection, why are we even here?
@aral I don't see it as a media source issue. I see it as a human issue. For me, I'm here to find people to have extended and weekly conversation with. Not to sell anything, not to find a mate, as I have one and am satisfied with her. No ulterior motives. Just human connection from outside my local sphere. But people, even here with the protection of distance, seem afraid to just chat. Fear of scams, and abusers is here. But the chance to find real and thoughtful and creative individuals is intriguing....
Go Up