Почти сто пятьдесят лет прошло с тех пор, как художник и фотограф Эдвард Мейбридж с помощь сложной фотосъёмки доказал, что галопирующая лошадь время от времени летит по воздуху. Или, иными словами, у лошади на бегу постоянно повторяется момент, когда ни одна нога не касается земли. Недавно в журнале PeerJ вышла статья, в которой то же самое пишут про бегемотов.
I love Internet, but the state of things on the Web is not very promising, to be honest:
- people don't pay for stuff with money
- there's no free lunch, stuff has to come from somewhere
- software devs and service providers have to resort to ads to get money to keep the lights on
- ad industry devours software and services alive
Mozilla/Facebook deal is not THE disease, it's a symptom.
I love Internet, but the state of things on the Web is not very promising, to be honest:
- people don't pay for stuff with money
- there's no free lunch, stuff has to come from somewhere
- software devs and service providers have to resort to ads to get money to keep the lights on
- ad industry devours software and services alive
@drq Oh, come on. Ads are not the problem. Paid access is not the problem. It all existed before. Magazines and other press, entertainment, various facilities like parks and toilets... It can be free, it can be paid, it can be sponsored.
The fucking problem we have is how ads and data mining got out of hand. I have no problem with ads themselves - but not tracking ads. I have no problem if some website (or real life facility) asks me to register - but please don't fucking fingerprint and track me without my knowledge and consent. It is like having hidden cameras installed everywhere. I have no problem if some service costs money - I might buy it or not but please make the deal clear and upfront. No hidden fees, etc.
Imagine all of this is effectively banned. No more tracking ads, no more profiling, no more data brokering. It just doesn't exist anymore. Will the Internet fall apart? No, it will not. It will be more like what we had twenty years ago. Maybe Facebook will become premium service. Maybe Cloudflare won't be free anymore. Maybe you won't be able to get TERABYTES of storage, unlimited videoconferencing and shit for free.
But the Internet will be there. And it will be nice enough.
@drq Oh, come on. Ads are not the problem. Paid access is not the problem. It all existed before. Magazines and other press, entertainment, various facilities like parks and toilets... It can be free, it can be paid, it can be sponsored.
I beg to slightly differ, people pay online stuff with money, see Patreon and Twitch subscriptions. However they are discriminate in what they’re paying for. The reality is that we’re churning out more content than what people are ready to pay for. On the other side, marketing departments are showered with money because it’s hard to link campaigns with actual results, so there’s an arms race between companies. So there’s a natural fit between content creators starving for money and moneyed marketing dept. starving for content.
I beg to slightly differ, people pay online stuff with money, see Patreon and Twitch subscriptions. However they are discriminate in what they’re paying for. The reality is that we’re churning out more content than what people are ready to pay for. On the other side, marketing departments are showered with money because it’s hard to link campaigns with actual results, so there’s an arms race between companies. So there’s a natural fit between content creators starving for money and moneyed marketing...
@KimCrayton1 it's also interesting how severe their fear is of anyone having more than one quality or identity. As a queer person I relate to how racial and ethnic identity should also be a complex spectrum treated with respect and even wonder (first Black woman and first Indian-American at once!!), but white conservatives hate that more than anything as they try to binary-fy us all.
@KimCrayton1 Very well said. The only questions I've ever gotten about what kind of "white" I am have been casual curiosity, not an assessment of my value, my right to be in a place or do a thing. I feel that privilege. #racism
With the quote in the alt text for any who can't read it (my instance limits text too much to just put the text in the toot):
The changes on YouTube and also the legislative attempts to block YouTube in our country really make me wonder:
What instead of YouTube?
I mean, really. Yeah, there's PeerTube, but at this point in history, it's not "there" yet - it lacks certain features, discoverability situation is questionable at best, not everyone is going to want to host it. And unless you have petabytes of space, you are not going to host an open node of this. Hosting video is prohibitively expensive. Hosting streams for thousands of people - even more so, even with p2p tricks.
So... What are the alternatives?
The changes on YouTube and also the legislative attempts to block YouTube in our country really make me wonder:
What instead of YouTube?
I mean, really. Yeah, there's PeerTube, but at this point in history, it's not "there" yet - it lacks certain features, discoverability situation is questionable at best, not everyone is going to want to host it. And unless you have petabytes of space, you are not going to host an open node of this. Hosting video is prohibitively expensive. Hosting streams for thousands...
@drq I think the main problem with YouTube alternatives is the history. Can you name some other video platform where I can just go and watch some random kid play gmod in 2008? There is so much content that YouTube is literally a time machine at this point. You can solve all technical problems of peertube, you can invest billions on development, but it will not replace 20 years of continuous uploading of new videos.
YouTube can't be replaced whether you like it or not. We have to find a way around the restrictions and make them as accessible as possible
@drq I think the main problem with YouTube alternatives is the history. Can you name some other video platform where I can just go and watch some random kid play gmod in 2008? There is so much content that YouTube is literally a time machine at this point. You can solve all technical problems of peertube, you can invest billions on development, but it will not replace 20 years of continuous uploading of new videos.
@drq in this form, it's a definition problem more than anything.
An alternative isn't just *to* something, it's *in* (or is it *for*? I dunno) solving a specific problem also. And YouTube's list of problems it solves is, as is appropriate for its size, uniquely large.
So there probably isn't going to be just one alternative, but many, for different purposes. Probably with some empty spots where no solution exists, and some empty spots where the problem isn't worth solving.
@drq TBH, I like light themes with high contrast. Browsers should really provide a user‐facing option to toggle that without changing setting of your OS (like they already do for light/dark switching). CSS already has enough to read that data.
Жиль Вандевалле (Gilles Vandewalle) и его коллеги четырежды в год – то есть по разу в сезон – приглашали 28 добровольцев в лабораторию, где те жили несколько дней и одновременно проходили тесты на высшую когнитивную деятельность (у них оценивали способность удерживать внимание на чём-то, способность запоминать и сравнивать информацию, и т. д.); прохождение теста сопровождалось томографическим сканированием мозга. В статье в PNAS авторы пишут, что все «подопытные», вне зависимости от времени года, справлялись с тестами более-менее одинаково, то есть у одного и того же человека память и внимание зимой работали так же, как летом, осенью или весной.
Отличия же были в том, как мозг распоряжался нейронными ресурсами для таких задач. Например, летом, и особенно в июне на поддержание внимания тратилось больше нейронных сил, чем зимой (причём минимум и максимум приходились как раз на дни вблизи летнего и зимнего солнцестояния). А вот рабочая память требовала больше всего ресурсов осенью, и меньше всего – весной, во время весеннего равноденствия. На всякий случай ещё раз уточним, что речь идёт не о том, что мы хуже или лучше думаем в разное время года, а о том, что на один и тот же результат от мозга требуются разные усилия.
Почему так происходит, авторы работы пока сказать не могут, да и полученные результаты хорошо бы перепроверить на большем числе людей.
Жиль Вандевалле (Gilles Vandewalle) и его коллеги четырежды в год – то есть по разу в сезон – приглашали 28 добровольцев в лабораторию, где те жили несколько дней и одновременно проходили тесты на высшую когнитивную деятельность (у них оценивали способность удерживать внимание на чём-то, способность запоминать и сравнивать информацию, и т. д.); прохождение теста...