Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Contradiction Finder

@adam @simon If they really need money, they will:

* publish a mailing address where people can send cash or cheques.
* publish some cryptocurrency addresses
* publish seminars/events they attend where they would have a physical “tip jar”
* get bank accounts opened in the US and Europe

75 comments
Simon Poole

@batalanto @adam
Note that the OSMF has an "EU bank account" wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Do

Cheques nearly never make sense (if you think bank fees for xfers are bad, you are in for a surprise wrt cheques outside of the US), and accepting cash has its own issues.

Contradiction Finder

@simon @adam I thought cheques were the norm in the UK.

In the US: paper checks are still king for sending money remotely. Wires are absurdly expensive. E-checks move slower than snail-mailed paper checks & they are subject to scrutiny. I tried to send ~$300 by popmoney (echeck) & got interrogated as to how I know the person & what I was buying. Took like 4 days.

If they need the money bad enough, they will accept cash. We have a civic duty to fight the #warOnCash.

Contradiction Finder

@simon @adam OSM needs to reference that wiki page from their donations page. On their donations page, I had to click to get a paypal alternative and on that page they only mentioned the GBP account.

Brian Smith

@batalanto @simon @adam
I'm in the UK and I haven't written out a cheque in about 5 years.
Near enough everything is Card or contactless (Phone etc).

Contradiction Finder

@BrianSmith950
So say you rack up a credit card bill. Then how to do you pay the bill?

And for remote p2p payments, how is that done?

@simon @adam

Brian Smith

@batalanto @simon @adam

I pay my bills through my bank's website or phone app.

Remote P2P can be done through the bank app or paypal or a number of other apps.

Contradiction Finder

@BrianSmith950
We can scrap the Paypal option. It’s shit.

The “by app” options are not really by software, but rather an underlying transfer mechanism. Americans login to their bank accounts to pay their bills, but that’s just a façade for how the money moves. The user often does not even know. Typically an outsourced #billpay service checks whether a payee such as a credit card is linked electronically, then the money moves electronically by ACH. If not, a check is printed and mailed & that’s entirely invisible to the payer. The free bill pay service covers the cost of the stamp. Of course there’s a bit of dodgyness there because how does the billpay service pay their bills if they’re free to you and your bank? They must be snooping & selling your data to data brokers. So sending a paper check yourself manually is the only counter to that.

The UK has the GDPR, so perhaps you have some protection against those shenanigans.
@simon @adam

@BrianSmith950
We can scrap the Paypal option. It’s shit.

The “by app” options are not really by software, but rather an underlying transfer mechanism. Americans login to their bank accounts to pay their bills, but that’s just a façade for how the money moves. The user often does not even know. Typically an outsourced #billpay service checks whether a payee such as a credit card is linked electronically, then the money moves electronically by ACH. If not, a check is printed and mailed & that’s entirely...

Brian Smith

@batalanto @simon @adam
Not being familiar with US banking,

We tend to get a debit card directly from the bank, which can be used to draw cash from the bank ATM's (Any bank, a lot of big shops also provide them for free but smaller operators charge you to draw money. they are all linked) and can be used for purchases, the money comes straight out of your current account.
A lot of people also have a credit card, may be issued by your bank, or you can sign up with another supplier.

Simon Poole replied to Brian

@BrianSmith950 @batalanto @adam while this is all a bit OT: cheques haven't been a thing in most of western Europe for at least half a century. Essentially they died out as soon as salaries started getting paid by bank transfers/wires. I've never actually wrote out a personal cheque (and I've maybe cashed perhaps max a dozen or so, probable not even that many).

zbrando replied to Brian

@BrianSmith950 @batalanto @simon @adam Same situation in EU. For the checks, I haven't seen one in 25 years. Northern countries are almost all digital.

matzipan

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam just because you think it's shit doesn't mean it is. Lots of people use it and find it practical.

Most banks in Europe that I know have almost instant if not instant bank transfers. Why would I bother with checks 😂

Contradiction Finder replied to matzipan

@matzipan Not sure you read the whole thread. Anyone who is well informed & does not consider #paypal shit is likely a piece of shit themselves. By “informed”, I mean being aware of these damning facts:

git.disroot.org/cyberMonk/libe

Most people are either uninformed, or unwilling to let ethics get in their way. OSM needs to become informed about Paypal.

@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Simon Poole replied to Contradiction

@batalanto @matzipan @BrianSmith950 @adam the point is without paypal the OSMF would be without a payment processor, nobody has any illusions about the company as such, using them is simply a practicality.

Adam replied to Simon

@simon @batalanto @matzipan @BrianSmith950

This is false. If it weren't for PayPal, OSMF would still be able to have payments processed via their bank or bitcoin.

Here's a link to the documentation showing this: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Do

Simon Poole replied to Adam

@adam @batalanto @matzipan @BrianSmith950 there are things like credit cards that many many people prefer to use for such payments, and not supporting that would immediately eliminate a large number of potential donors.

Contradiction Finder replied to Simon

@simon
I’m willing to pay for things by credit card iff:

* cash & crypto are not options
* the payment processor is not Paypal

I ate in a restaurant recently & in a rare circumstance cash was not an option for me. So I paid by card. Then the receipt mentioned some #Paypal subsidiary. I was so disgusted to find that paypal snagged my payment details & benefited from something I did despite being offline in a brick&mortar shop. I was tricked into going against my #boycott.

Anyway, whenever I’m paying online by credit card, I always check to see if they also accept Paypal, which then triggers me to do some deeper checks on whether my visa/mc/amex payment will traverse Paypal systems. If yes, I walk.

@adam @matzipan @BrianSmith950

@simon
I’m willing to pay for things by credit card iff:

* cash & crypto are not options
* the payment processor is not Paypal

I ate in a restaurant recently & in a rare circumstance cash was not an option for me. So I paid by card. Then the receipt mentioned some #Paypal subsidiary. I was so disgusted to find that paypal snagged my payment details & benefited from something I did despite being offline in a brick&mortar shop. I was tricked into going against my #boycott.

matzipan replied to Contradiction

@batalanto @simon @adam @BrianSmith950 it has its advantages. I prefer paying by paypal instead of card because at least my card details can't be stolen. Happened to me before and it was very inconvenient. That I have to put up with privacy invasion because of this just shows that we don't have any strong European competitors to paypal 😓

Contradiction Finder replied to Contradiction

@matzipan I used Paypal before they locked my account & kept the money -- before I became broadly aware of Paypal’s wrongdoing.

w.r.t checks, what do you do in Europe if you want to pay someone who does not have a bank account? A check covers that situation. Cash is better, but because of the #warOnCash Belgium, France, & Spain have outlawed cash transactions above a certain amount.

@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Contradiction Finder replied to Contradiction

@matzipan
Homes in Europe are still bought with checks. E.g. in Belgium upon closing on a house, the buyer must appear at the notaire with proof of down payment. A screenshot of a transfer is not accepted. So a banker’s check is often used.

I agree checks are rare in Europe but there are a number of factors that drive people to be unbanked which makes checks more important.
@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Contradiction Finder replied to Contradiction

@matzipan
In recent years, some EU banks have closed their over-the-counter service and also shutdown their website. If you want to send money, you must buy a smartphone, register an acct with google or apple, obtain the bank’s closed-source app from Google or Apple & be willing to run the app. And you must repeat that cycle when the bank’s chronic upgrades force you to buy a new phone. I would prefer checks over that.
@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

matzipan replied to Contradiction

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam that is a good point and I would see both paypal locking people out and banks not supporting web or non-googlefied smartphones as topics for another digital banking reform in the EU.

matzipan replied to Contradiction

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam I just don't. This problem does not for me for sums that cannot be managed by some cash.

Contradiction Finder replied to matzipan

@matzipan
Consider how utilities are paid in Europe. You pay an estimated amount monthly. After a year, the supplier calculates your exact figures and refunds you the amount you overpaid. If you have no bank account, you’re fucked because the energy supplier will not pay you cash and they will not send a check.

BTW, checks still exist in western Europe; France more so than others. Outside of France you have to pick the right bank & apply some pressure to get a checkbook.
@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

@matzipan
Consider how utilities are paid in Europe. You pay an estimated amount monthly. After a year, the supplier calculates your exact figures and refunds you the amount you overpaid. If you have no bank account, you’re fucked because the energy supplier will not pay you cash and they will not send a check.

matzipan replied to Contradiction

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam I think qualifying so many people (including myself) as pieces of shit is probably not nice thing to do and maybe you need to reconsider your approach.

Sarah Dal

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam the transfer system in the UK is either BACS or FPS, the banks themselves pay for each transaction as a cost of business. I doubt there's any sale of personal details going on as we do have data protection laws.

Contradiction Finder replied to Sarah

@sarahdalgulls
Good to hear UK→UK transactions are fee-free.
Non-UK→UK will get you burnt. I opened an account in the UK & had to fund it. The brokerage said in their ToS that they charge no fees for transfers. So I sent money to fund my own account. Less money arrived than what I sent. My bank denied taking a fee & the broker denied taking a fee. It turned out that an intermediary working for the broker took a fee.
@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Contradiction Finder replied to Contradiction

@sarahdalgulls
I was upset about it because I did diligent research before sending the money. Even after I got burnt, nothing in either of my contracts with my bank or brokerage disclosed the fee that was taken. When I tracked down who the intermediary was (who i did not have a contract with), I asked them for a written statement of the fee and how much they take. They said that’s private- between us & the broker.
@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Sarah Dal replied to Contradiction

@batalanto that really sucks. I've never had a problem transferring internationally within europe, but there's always fees and shocking exchange rates; with the US banking system being very different to ours I imagine there's tonnes of ways for people to make a quick buck out of it

Elijah Modnar

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @adam @simon I’ve not written a cheque in about as long. However I get one in the post from my energy supplier every quarter. They won’t transfer the money to me directly.

Bargearse

@batalanto
Here in Australia cheques are being phased out all together, I haven't used one in about 15 years... they are just not used. Bank transfers are now instantaneous, interbank and fee less.

The Fed is the US has just launched a new fast payment system.

edition.cnn.com/2023/07/20/eco

I dont know why they just don't use fee free crypto as well eg Nano, assuming they have access to an exchange to swap to Euro ? That's the entire point of crypto, to solve these shennagians.

@simon @adam

@batalanto
Here in Australia cheques are being phased out all together, I haven't used one in about 15 years... they are just not used. Bank transfers are now instantaneous, interbank and fee less.

The Fed is the US has just launched a new fast payment system.

edition.cnn.com/2023/07/20/eco

Contradiction Finder

@largess
Interesting that they are instantaneous. The US & Europe would never have that. They want to snoop & nanny the transactions & be able to intervene. That lag is mostly a burden on the people but it does have an upside: if criminals convince grandma to send money to their money mule, it can at least be stopped while the money is in limbo.
@simon @adam

Jesse

@batalanto

In the Netherlands they are instantaneous and have been for a few years. Within the same bank it has been instantaneous forever

Contradiction Finder

@531095 Surely it depends on the bank. In Belgium for example, most cheap or gratis accounts impose a ~2—3 day lag on transfers. You generally must pay an extra fee for expedition (or bank at KBC, or subscribe to a higher tier premium contract). The banks earn interest while the money sits in limbo & they want compensation if they give that up.

And even then I don’t think the expedited service is instantaneous because that would make it impossible to intervene in a transfer. As I understand it, you’re only guaranteed rapid payments hit the same day they are sent. A human still has to be in the loop to approve or decline the transfer. I don’t see how the expressline could bypass the human (which would be necessary for instantaneous movement).

Also note there is a downside to the expedited SEPA transfers: you cannot transfer more than €15k. IIUC, that’s an EU rule. Not sure if it’s per day or per week.

Thus there are situations where the slow transfer serves you better. And in the case of KBC, the transfer form does not even give you the option of a slow transfer. You probably have to make an appointment to have it sent manually if you have more than 15k to send.

@531095 Surely it depends on the bank. In Belgium for example, most cheap or gratis accounts impose a ~2—3 day lag on transfers. You generally must pay an extra fee for expedition (or bank at KBC, or subscribe to a higher tier premium contract). The banks earn interest while the money sits in limbo & they want compensation if they give that up.

bws

@simon @batalanto @adam btw, just wired a donation via banktransfer, thanks for the info again, without it it would not have happened.

Contradiction Finder

@bws @adam @simon I never hear Europeans use the term /wire transfer/, so for a second I thought you were American & wondered what US bank wouldn’t fleece you. Guess you’ve picked up some Americanisms.

. stdh .

@simon I checked out the wiki page, it mentions sending an email with donation details for processing. On the other hand supporting.openstreetmap.org/a provides a web form, presumably for the same purpose. Should I use the form then?
I'd like to avoid Paypal as well, I hope my donation is worth the volunteer time needed for processing. 😄

Guillaume Rischard

@stdh either works. Thank you very much for your support!

Paul Norman

@simon @batalanto @adam Pretty sure bank transfer expenses exceed PayPal fees - that is certainly the case for memberships where people need to monitor the accounts, worry about fraudulent transactions, and do manual work for transfers.

Cash is worse unless you're a business regularly handling it.

Ian Wagner

@pnorman @simon @batalanto @adam it depends. If you have a crappy local bank than yes fees are often sky high. If you use Wise, the fees are usually fairly cheap for smallish transfers. For large transfers, international wires are usually the cheapest option unless you bank is exceptionally predatory. PayPal fees are, in my experience, excessive, but it’s highly situation dependent.

Contradiction Finder

@ianthetechie @pnorman
IIUC, this subthread is regarding payments to the Irish bank account, correct? If so, I think you would be hard-pressed to find a bank that even charges a penny for SEPA→SEPA which is typically gratis. That beats Paypal in price, privacy, and ethically.

Of course non-SEPA→SEPA is typically a shit show. Although Paypal is always a shit show at least w.r.t. privacy & ethics.

@simon

Contradiction Finder

@ianthetechie @pnorman
You also have to factor in the risk that Paypal can freeze your account at any moment without cause (i.e. a vague “security” we “suspect” fraud nonsense) and lock your account and keep the money, as they did me.

It’s a bad idea to use Paypal in the 1st place but if you do, then you should get money out of PP ASAP. Yet if you operate that way PP fees are higher.
@simon

Contradiction Finder

@ianthetechie @pnorman
Of all methods, cash is the only one that:
* guarantees no fees (assuming no currency change)
* guarantees no MitM interference blocking or slowing the transaction.
* guarantees privacy (you can’t even trust Visa, Mastercard, Amex to not sell your data; they have opt-out pages but that’s actually a trick to get more data from you)
@simon

Paul Norman

@batalanto None of the expenses I called out are from the bank. They're in time spent dealing with the transfers, or in time spent dealing with the fraud consequences of publishing an IBAN on the web.

I don't think anyone involved *likes* Paypal, it's just all the alternatives for dealing with small donations to a place you can't visit in person suck just as much or more.

Guillaume Rischard

@batalanto @adam @simon supporting.openstreetmap.org/a has our Euro bank account (in Ireland) and our bitcoin. If cash or cheque is the only option, I can send you my address in NYC. Yes, we really need the money.

Contradiction Finder

@grischard I was going to DM you to ask for an address. The problem is that’s extremely insecure. Not just privacy, but a MitM would love to swap the address you tell people with their own address.

So mailing addresses should really be published. If OSM staff do not want to expose their personal addresses, one option is to publish “poste restante” addresses, which is the address of the nearest post office that accepts “poste restante” mail (not all do). I think in the US the post offices will hold mail for up to 14 days. Not sure if that’s the same limit around the world. So someone would have to send a msg to tell you that they sent something so you know to go to the post office (with ID) and check for an arrival. Yeah it’s cumbersome but OSM should offering as many options as possible under the circumstances of mainstream options being lousy. It would be useful if OSM staff in the UK, US, Europe, etc, would volunteer to pick up poste restante mail. Then you could give a variety of addresses so donors could pick the closest.

It’s good that the website warns people that crypto is converted into fiat money, so donors know there’s some lossy overhead if they choose that method.

@adam @simon

@grischard I was going to DM you to ask for an address. The problem is that’s extremely insecure. Not just privacy, but a MitM would love to swap the address you tell people with their own address.

So mailing addresses should really be published. If OSM staff do not want to expose their personal addresses, one option is to publish “poste restante” addresses, which is the address of the nearest post office that accepts “poste restante” mail (not all do). I think in the US the post offices will hold...

Guillaume Rischard

@batalanto @adam @simon the constraint for all methods is volunteer time. We have no love for the payment methods we use; we're grateful that they integrate relatively easily with civicrm.

Contradiction Finder

@grischard I know nothing about GNU Taler but superficially that looks like it could be an ethical Paypal alternative to check out.

Contradiction Finder

@grischard I just noticed you published a UK address at “St John’s Innovation Centre”. Can you receive cash at that address?

Guillaume Rischard

@batalanto not really, and not sure how they'd process it (would they scan it like they do with letters? 😀 )

Guillaume Rischard

@batalanto I see no civicrm integration unfortunately. So you're talking not fun custom php code, instead of slightly less painful financial reporting (i.e. visually show where the money goes), which would probably drive more donations...

Go Up