Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Simon Poole

The downsides of being frugal.

The #OpenStreetMap Foundation spends, even with a slightly more ambitious budget this year than previously, less than %1 of what WMF/Wikipedia does, but is struggling to make ends meet.

There is no threat a la the infamous Wikipedia ads that the project will shut down, but without the funds activities will have to be cut back significantly.

If you consider OSM valuable consider supporting.openstreetmap.org/

130 comments
pang pang trululu trululu

@simon I love OSM, and I searched again to create my own tiles, found this: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR why is that article both french and english? I can talk both but it's weird.

Sam Wilson

@kiki_mwai_mwai @simon I guess that page hasn't been fully translated. It looks like it was probably copied from an English source, and translation begun but not finished. If you're up for it, I'd say go ahead and translate the remaining bits!

Adam

@simon
Thanks for the reminder. I don't have dollars to donate, but I have bitcoin I could spare. I've emailed the board to see how I can get more funds into their hands!

Contradiction Finder

@adam @simon Indeed the payment options are shit. The problem with #Paypal & credit card via paypal:

git.disroot.org/cyberMonk/libe

The only alternative is intl. bank xfers. And since itā€™s not SEPA thereā€™s likely a money grab by the intermediate banks involved. Fuck that.

Contradiction Finder

@adam @simon If they really need money, they will:

* publish a mailing address where people can send cash or cheques.
* publish some cryptocurrency addresses
* publish seminars/events they attend where they would have a physical ā€œtip jarā€
* get bank accounts opened in the US and Europe

Simon Poole

@batalanto @adam
Note that the OSMF has an "EU bank account" wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Do

Cheques nearly never make sense (if you think bank fees for xfers are bad, you are in for a surprise wrt cheques outside of the US), and accepting cash has its own issues.

Contradiction Finder

@simon @adam I thought cheques were the norm in the UK.

In the US: paper checks are still king for sending money remotely. Wires are absurdly expensive. E-checks move slower than snail-mailed paper checks & they are subject to scrutiny. I tried to send ~$300 by popmoney (echeck) & got interrogated as to how I know the person & what I was buying. Took like 4 days.

If they need the money bad enough, they will accept cash. We have a civic duty to fight the #warOnCash.

Contradiction Finder

@simon @adam OSM needs to reference that wiki page from their donations page. On their donations page, I had to click to get a paypal alternative and on that page they only mentioned the GBP account.

Brian Smith

@batalanto @simon @adam
I'm in the UK and I haven't written out a cheque in about 5 years.
Near enough everything is Card or contactless (Phone etc).

Contradiction Finder

@BrianSmith950
So say you rack up a credit card bill. Then how to do you pay the bill?

And for remote p2p payments, how is that done?

@simon @adam

Brian Smith

@batalanto @simon @adam

I pay my bills through my bank's website or phone app.

Remote P2P can be done through the bank app or paypal or a number of other apps.

Contradiction Finder

@BrianSmith950
We can scrap the Paypal option. Itā€™s shit.

The ā€œby appā€ options are not really by software, but rather an underlying transfer mechanism. Americans login to their bank accounts to pay their bills, but thatā€™s just a faƧade for how the money moves. The user often does not even know. Typically an outsourced #billpay service checks whether a payee such as a credit card is linked electronically, then the money moves electronically by ACH. If not, a check is printed and mailed & thatā€™s entirely invisible to the payer. The free bill pay service covers the cost of the stamp. Of course thereā€™s a bit of dodgyness there because how does the billpay service pay their bills if theyā€™re free to you and your bank? They must be snooping & selling your data to data brokers. So sending a paper check yourself manually is the only counter to that.

The UK has the GDPR, so perhaps you have some protection against those shenanigans.
@simon @adam

@BrianSmith950
We can scrap the Paypal option. Itā€™s shit.

The ā€œby appā€ options are not really by software, but rather an underlying transfer mechanism. Americans login to their bank accounts to pay their bills, but thatā€™s just a faƧade for how the money moves. The user often does not even know. Typically an outsourced #billpay service checks whether a payee such as a credit card is linked electronically, then the money moves electronically by ACH. If not, a check is printed and mailed & thatā€™s entirely...

Brian Smith

@batalanto @simon @adam
Not being familiar with US banking,

We tend to get a debit card directly from the bank, which can be used to draw cash from the bank ATM's (Any bank, a lot of big shops also provide them for free but smaller operators charge you to draw money. they are all linked) and can be used for purchases, the money comes straight out of your current account.
A lot of people also have a credit card, may be issued by your bank, or you can sign up with another supplier.

Simon Poole replied to Brian

@BrianSmith950 @batalanto @adam while this is all a bit OT: cheques haven't been a thing in most of western Europe for at least half a century. Essentially they died out as soon as salaries started getting paid by bank transfers/wires. I've never actually wrote out a personal cheque (and I've maybe cashed perhaps max a dozen or so, probable not even that many).

zbrando replied to Brian

@BrianSmith950 @batalanto @simon @adam Same situation in EU. For the checks, I haven't seen one in 25 years. Northern countries are almost all digital.

matzipan

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam just because you think it's shit doesn't mean it is. Lots of people use it and find it practical.

Most banks in Europe that I know have almost instant if not instant bank transfers. Why would I bother with checks šŸ˜‚

Contradiction Finder replied to matzipan

@matzipan Not sure you read the whole thread. Anyone who is well informed & does not consider #paypal shit is likely a piece of shit themselves. By ā€œinformedā€, I mean being aware of these damning facts:

git.disroot.org/cyberMonk/libe

Most people are either uninformed, or unwilling to let ethics get in their way. OSM needs to become informed about Paypal.

@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Simon Poole replied to Contradiction

@batalanto @matzipan @BrianSmith950 @adam the point is without paypal the OSMF would be without a payment processor, nobody has any illusions about the company as such, using them is simply a practicality.

Adam replied to Simon

@simon @batalanto @matzipan @BrianSmith950

This is false. If it weren't for PayPal, OSMF would still be able to have payments processed via their bank or bitcoin.

Here's a link to the documentation showing this: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Do

Simon Poole replied to Adam

@adam @batalanto @matzipan @BrianSmith950 there are things like credit cards that many many people prefer to use for such payments, and not supporting that would immediately eliminate a large number of potential donors.

Contradiction Finder replied to Contradiction

@matzipan I used Paypal before they locked my account & kept the money -- before I became broadly aware of Paypalā€™s wrongdoing.

w.r.t checks, what do you do in Europe if you want to pay someone who does not have a bank account? A check covers that situation. Cash is better, but because of the #warOnCash Belgium, France, & Spain have outlawed cash transactions above a certain amount.

@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Contradiction Finder replied to Contradiction

@matzipan
Homes in Europe are still bought with checks. E.g. in Belgium upon closing on a house, the buyer must appear at the notaire with proof of down payment. A screenshot of a transfer is not accepted. So a bankerā€™s check is often used.

I agree checks are rare in Europe but there are a number of factors that drive people to be unbanked which makes checks more important.
@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Contradiction Finder replied to Contradiction

@matzipan
In recent years, some EU banks have closed their over-the-counter service and also shutdown their website. If you want to send money, you must buy a smartphone, register an acct with google or apple, obtain the bankā€™s closed-source app from Google or Apple & be willing to run the app. And you must repeat that cycle when the bankā€™s chronic upgrades force you to buy a new phone. I would prefer checks over that.
@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

matzipan replied to Contradiction

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam that is a good point and I would see both paypal locking people out and banks not supporting web or non-googlefied smartphones as topics for another digital banking reform in the EU.

matzipan replied to Contradiction

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam I just don't. This problem does not for me for sums that cannot be managed by some cash.

matzipan replied to Contradiction

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam I think qualifying so many people (including myself) as pieces of shit is probably not nice thing to do and maybe you need to reconsider your approach.

Sarah Dal

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @simon @adam the transfer system in the UK is either BACS or FPS, the banks themselves pay for each transaction as a cost of business. I doubt there's any sale of personal details going on as we do have data protection laws.

Contradiction Finder replied to Sarah

@sarahdalgulls
Good to hear UKā†’UK transactions are fee-free.
Non-UKā†’UK will get you burnt. I opened an account in the UK & had to fund it. The brokerage said in their ToS that they charge no fees for transfers. So I sent money to fund my own account. Less money arrived than what I sent. My bank denied taking a fee & the broker denied taking a fee. It turned out that an intermediary working for the broker took a fee.
@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Contradiction Finder replied to Contradiction

@sarahdalgulls
I was upset about it because I did diligent research before sending the money. Even after I got burnt, nothing in either of my contracts with my bank or brokerage disclosed the fee that was taken. When I tracked down who the intermediary was (who i did not have a contract with), I asked them for a written statement of the fee and how much they take. They said thatā€™s private- between us & the broker.
@BrianSmith950 @simon @adam

Elijah Modnar

@batalanto @BrianSmith950 @adam @simon Iā€™ve not written a cheque in about as long. However I get one in the post from my energy supplier every quarter. They wonā€™t transfer the money to me directly.

Bargearse

@batalanto
Here in Australia cheques are being phased out all together, I haven't used one in about 15 years... they are just not used. Bank transfers are now instantaneous, interbank and fee less.

The Fed is the US has just launched a new fast payment system.

edition.cnn.com/2023/07/20/eco

I dont know why they just don't use fee free crypto as well eg Nano, assuming they have access to an exchange to swap to Euro ? That's the entire point of crypto, to solve these shennagians.

@simon @adam

@batalanto
Here in Australia cheques are being phased out all together, I haven't used one in about 15 years... they are just not used. Bank transfers are now instantaneous, interbank and fee less.

The Fed is the US has just launched a new fast payment system.

edition.cnn.com/2023/07/20/eco

Contradiction Finder

@largess
Interesting that they are instantaneous. The US & Europe would never have that. They want to snoop & nanny the transactions & be able to intervene. That lag is mostly a burden on the people but it does have an upside: if criminals convince grandma to send money to their money mule, it can at least be stopped while the money is in limbo.
@simon @adam

Adam

@batalanto @simon

Good news, the board got back to me and they do accept bitcoin! Their address is 1J3pt9koWJZTo2jarg98RL89iJqff9Kobp

And that can be confirmed here: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Do

(I mention both the wallet address and URL in case someone tries to update that wiki page to do a little switcharoo)

bws

@batalanto @adam @simon this. Sadly. As soon as i saw i had the choice between paypal and paypal i aborted&came back here šŸ˜‘

John Deters

@simon Thank you for posting this. I just signed up!

Alun Jones

@simon done. Early on, I was an active contributor, taking ever more eccentric routes on my daily commute to capture obscure roads. Nowadays I'm a consumer and it seems only right to contribute.

pettter

@simon OSM is also arguably used in a relatively official capacity by far more organisations also.

kristbaum

@simon Wasn't there some discussion some years ago to put OSM under the WMF umbrella? Wouldn't that still be an option, or is this unrealistic?

Simon Poole

@kristbaum not that I know of (and I know a fair bit :-)).

While the organisations are similar in many ways they are also very different. Not to mention that the WMF generally functions as the example of the kind of organisation the OSMF shouldn't turn in to (in a friendly way I point out).

So, unrealisitic, I would say

kristbaum

@simon Ah then I probably imagined that ;) But aside from how well either foundation is run, won't OSM profit massively from more resources and a bit less reliance on corporate donations? Or is this a too strong cultural difference between the two organisations?

Solinvictus :verified:

@simon does anyone know if, after donating, they offer a German Spendenbescheinigung or ZuwendungsbestƤtigung ? Thank you in advance šŸ™Œ

cc: @openstreetmap

Simon Poole

@dminca @openstreetmap you can get a receipt, but as the OSMF isn't a charity (not going in to the nitty gritty details of non-profits and all the associated differences from country to country) tl;dr that isn't going to help you.

Note however that the German OSMF local chapter is a charity, see fossgis.de/verein/spenden

Benjamin

@simon @dminca @openstreetmap does money donated to fossgis help the same way?

Solinvictus :verified:

@piratenpanda @simon @openstreetmap Looks like it does, at least this is what they stipulate on the website. You need to write in the payment description ā€žSpende OpenStreetMapā€œ or ā€žSpende OSMā€œ

Amįµƒįµ–anda šŸŒ¼

@piratenpanda @simon @dminca Yes-ish. It doesn't go directly to the OSMFoundation, rather to FOSSGIS. But they use that for OSM stuff, like running the German speaking OSM(+ other open geo) conference. Many of the web services that you see on osm.org are on FOSSGIS hosted (&paid for) services.

Derick Rethans

@simon I'd be helpful if there was a drive or a goal to strive for each year.

Simon Poole

@derickr well that depends on the budget naturally. Essentially donations need to be total budget - membership fees - any surplus from conferences.

This year that is Ā£500'000 and a bit. See wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Bo

Derick Rethans

@simon Sure, but put that up and front. The current membership recurrent payment is only through PayPal which isn't appropriate.

Derick Rethans

@simon my membership lapsed because I can't be arsed to do the complications around paying OSMF

Guillaume Rischard

@derickr @simon in the UK you can use a bank transfer. If the forms annoy you(fair), you can st transfer and we'll still use the cash to pay for bandwidth. supporting.openstreetmap.org/a

Simon Poole

@derickr you need to discuss that with @grischard ... but I suspect the gist is that the OSMF is happy to have at least one payment processor at all.

Syulang

@simon OSM data is invaluable for planning bushwalks, and drives a lot of navigation apps. Would be happy to donate for a really useful project.

Armin Hanisch

@simon Done āœ… And a big Thank You! to everyone involved with this important project!
@openstreetmap

Dashtop

@simon I have attempted to edit OSM and it's absolutely unbearable. Unless they actually improve their tool significantly to be on par with GMap or Street Complete or actually offer a usable map instead of a map editor, I can't deal with them.

Simon Poole

@Dashtop as GIS tools go, iD (the online editor) is considered to be quite user friendly. The intricacies of the subject matter however can't all be abstracted away and tools like StreetComplete don't allow you to change "everything" so that isn't a fair comparison.

Dashtop

@simon no it isn't. And that rawness contributes to not being very friendly to new editors.

Simon Poole

@Dashtop well iD has over the years taken a couple of million to write and maintain, I think everybody would be open to an even more user friendly editor if you arrange the financing.

jhall251

@simon
Is it necessary to slam Wikipedia to make an ask for open streets? It's a turn off imo.

spyke

@simon Commercial companies know that to sell something you need to make it easy to buy. One click and done. All there foundations like @openstreetmap and @gnome make it difficult instead: enter you name, last name, click 30 checkboxes, etc. No matter they sit without money.
I'm not even talking about that I'd like to see all donations in one place (like @opencollective or @Patreon).

fartkart
I took one turn against the navigation's (wrong) directions and it stopped navigating all at once
shadow_absorber

@simon if only shadow had the money currently to support all the projects they use they would... but for now a reply and boost is the best shadow can do

Patrick StƤhlin

@simon with a freestanding building in Geneva we would be much better off! šŸ˜‚

Go Up