Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
George Maschke

@Gargron Whether it's Trump or Harris, a fascist is going to win the U.S. presidential election. Those of us opposed to fascism can vote for Jill Stein. Even though it's clear she's not going to win, we have the opportunity to build an anti-fascist alternative in American politics.

48 comments
Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@gwm Come on. It's 2024. At this point you need to be able bring yourself to admit that Jill Stein is Putin's puppet. She is supported by one of the biggest fascists in power today.

It would be lovely to have a viable green party in the US. But *you don't have that*. You have a Russian op. Jill Stein is not what you want.

Harris is far from perfect, but is also nowhere near is a fascist. Trump and Jill Stein, however, literally are.

George Maschke

@WAHa_06x36 I have seen no credible evidence that Jill Stein is in any sense "Putin's puppet."

As for Kamala Harris being a fascist, she's in the pocket of moneyed interests and supports a militaristic foreign policy, including full throated support for Israel's ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.

baconandcoconut

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 There's a lot of space between "intermittently beholden to some corporate interests" and "we won't have elections anymore and will violently round up our political adversaries." Neither is ideal but one is clearly better.

George Maschke

@baconandcoconut @WAHa_06x36 For me, support for genocide is a red line I am unwilling to cross.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@gwm @baconandcoconut Understood, and it sucks that you do not get a good choice on that, but, that's it: You don't get a good choice on that.

Trump is *much worse* on that than Harris, and a vote for Jill Stein helps only Trump.

George Maschke

@WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut My vote for Jill Stein will not help Donald Trump in any way.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@gwm @baconandcoconut I struggle to believe you are actually so naïve that you believe this.

George Maschke

@WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut A vote for Jill Stein does not add to any other candidate's vote tally.

DELETED replied to Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@WAHa_06x36 @gwm @baconandcoconut if you look at his profile... I mean he likely is that stupid.

And quite conservative.

George Maschke replied to Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut You seem to believe that I had an ethical duty to vote for Kamala Harris. That was never going to happen. She disqualified herself by supporting genocide.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎ replied to George

@gwm I don't think you had a "duty" to do anything. I think you wanted to do something - prevent genocide - and you made a choice that ended up hurting that goal. That has nothing to do with "duty", and everything to do with how things work in practice.

George Maschke replied to Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@WAHa_06x36 I don't see how voting for a candidate who supports a genocide will help to end it.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎ replied to George

@gwm Because that one candidate can have her mind changed, and the other can not, and risks ending democracy as a whole.

Brian Stafford replied to George

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut considering both Putin and Netanyahu are gambling on a Trump victory, it's fair to say a vote for Trump is a vote for genocide. Sometimes you need to hold your nose and vote strategically, not because you think Harris will be bad, but because electing Trump would be catastrophic. That is the eventuality to prevent.

DELETED

@gwm that's not how any of this works.

No single person alive has done more to thwart climate action than Jill "Princess of Grift" Stein

Mindsets

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut

The absolute vote tally—which you refer to, Mr. Maschke—is irrelevant in our system. The relative vote tally determines the winner, not the absolute vote tally.

So that's the flaw in your logic. Please let me know if you have any further questions.

NosirrahSec 🏴‍☠️

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut This is observably, demonstrably, incorrect in every context minus ONE. (the only one you're choosing to recognize)

You aren't CHOOSING to help Donald Trump, but your choice does help him when you take into account every other variable that is both obvious and historically repeated and documented.

Splitting the vote in close races is the same as, or worse, as supporting the worse option. This is a literal thing used and abused for decades now.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoiler_

This is not new. You are not going to disprove it by simply stamping your feet and crying like a petulant child.

Voting against Harris, as detestable as you believe it to be, is voting for Trump in effect. The degree of that effect varies depending on what state you are in.

Voting for Jill Stein, who has 0% chance of winning the election, is a vote for Trump by proxy.

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut This is observably, demonstrably, incorrect in every context minus ONE. (the only one you're choosing to recognize)

You aren't CHOOSING to help Donald Trump, but your choice does help him when you take into account every other variable that is both obvious and historically repeated and documented.

Joe Foster

@gwm Your vote for Jill Stein elects Donald Trump. You're trolling people with how bad this is.

baconandcoconut

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 American activists will not be able to continue advocating for an end to the atrocities in Palestine under a US dictatorship. The power to stop US support won't be about public opinion, it will be about the whim of one angry, all-powerful person who is willing to put activists in jail whenever he feels like it.

DELETED

@baconandcoconut @gwm @WAHa_06x36 counterpoint, they won't need to. If Trump wins there will be no Palestinians left to support.

Joe Foster

@gwm You support war crimes in Ukraine as Jill Stein supports the Russian invasion. Period.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@gwm Look, there is literally a photo of her sitting down for dinner with him. If that is not enough for you I can not help you:

nbcnews.com/news/world/guess-w

George Maschke

@WAHa_06x36 Jill Stein attended a media event in Moscow in 2015. She was a speaker there and attended at her own expense. Vladimir Putin sat at her table for about fifteen minutes and pleasantries were exchanged. It takes strongly motivated reasoning to leap from this to the conclusion that Jill Stein is a "Russian asset."

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@gwm How many "media events" did Harris attend with Putin?

And that is far from the only reason, it is just the most blatantly visible one. Did you look at who else attended?

As for other reason, there are many: thirdway.org/memo/jill-stein-a

AlexTECPlayz

@gwm The problem with Jill Stein is that she's a Russian puppet that seemingly does nothing besides asking for money every general election. It's nice to see a growing movement for a third party to break the two-party 'rule' the US had for decades, if not centuries, but I'd still recommend voting for Harris, if you even want to have a chance at a third party.

Trump/Vance would certainly worsen things for everyone, heck he might go full-on hard-right or fascist. I don't think this is the time for a third party vote, when the stakes seem so high.

Also, how in the hell is Kamala a 'fascist'? What are you smoking?

@gwm The problem with Jill Stein is that she's a Russian puppet that seemingly does nothing besides asking for money every general election. It's nice to see a growing movement for a third party to break the two-party 'rule' the US had for decades, if not centuries, but I'd still recommend voting for Harris, if you even want to have a chance at a third party.

Nina Felwitch :v_trans:

@alextecplayz @gwm people like George here are indirectly promoting a vote for Trump. The way the US voting system works is that every vote for a third party will indirectly support whoever has the most votes.

Splitting leftist votes between multiple candidates will lead to Trump winning. There is no denying that fact. The US system doesn't allow for coalitions like Germany, where multiple parties can band together to form the government, even though individually they have fewer votes than another party.

Everyone who wants to prevent another Trump presidency will have to vote Harris.

@alextecplayz @gwm people like George here are indirectly promoting a vote for Trump. The way the US voting system works is that every vote for a third party will indirectly support whoever has the most votes.

Splitting leftist votes between multiple candidates will lead to Trump winning. There is no denying that fact. The US system doesn't allow for coalitions like Germany, where multiple parties can band together to form the government, even though individually they have fewer votes than another party.

Cody :collar: :verified_paw:

@Gargron@mastodon.social @gwm@mastodon.social These people should really read some political strategy... Preventing a fascist bigot from being president (again) is much more important than voting for someone who is guaranteed to not win. Learn to compromise.

George Maschke

@Gargron What do you think I have written here that is stupid?

Dinger

@Gargron @gwm they’re both supporting a genocide and have shown complete disregard for American and International law.

Meercat ✅

@Gargron Why do people reply to this Putin puppet? Please just block and ignore this russian troll

RaysOfRed

@gwm @Gargron yeah but one side wants me erased from the public so no

fr0g

@gwm @Gargron

"Whether it's Trump or Harris, a fascist is going to win the U.S. presidential election."

No.

Rick Воля 🇪🇺💚

@gwm @Gargron People like you help Trump. Do you even realise this?
Also, you should look into Jill Stein. Hint: she's a Kremlin asset.

Nina Felwitch :v_trans:

@gwm every vote that is not going to Harris and instead to a third party with no chance of winning will indirectly go to Trump. By not voting for Harris you're voting for Trump.
Maybe do some research about the US voting system.

Baloo Uriza

@gwm Opposing fascism by voting against the antifascist coalition with a throwaway candidate that's not even on the ballot in most states is not being antifascist.

Anthony, of course

@gwm this is horrendous advice. Just a wasted vote. At the very least vote for the one of the two you dislike the least. Nobody else has a chance, but your vote can make a difference among the other two. And one is SIGNIFICANTLY more dangerous, and proven so. Christ!

George Maschke

@anthony I will never vote for a candidate who supports genocide. Nobody should.

Anthony, of course

@gwm that does not make a third party vote valuable, sadly. And if Hitler 2.0 is elected then people who voted for a third party will be as responsible as those who didn't vote or those who did vote for the monster. Now is not the time to simply protest vote. Votes need to mean something, now more than ever.

Regardless, you've already cast your vote, and I doubt there's any changing your mind anyway, but in case anyone else stumbles across this, holy shit don't let your vote go to waste!

George Maschke

@anthony Third party votes are valuable even if the third party candidate does not win. They are crucial for building an alternative to the duopoly that rules us now. This is a process that will take time to succeed.

Nochem ben Shlomo

@gwm @Gargron

I did that once with Barry Commoner in 1980 because I couldn't bring myself to vote for the centrist Democrat Jimmy Carter. When Reagan and the Heritage Foundation took power, that vote seemed really stupid. I spent years paying for it with untold hours on the streets in demonstrations and knocking on doors to try to un-do it.

Go Up