Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
George Maschke

@WAHa_06x36 I have seen no credible evidence that Jill Stein is in any sense "Putin's puppet."

As for Kamala Harris being a fascist, she's in the pocket of moneyed interests and supports a militaristic foreign policy, including full throated support for Israel's ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.

23 comments
baconandcoconut

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 There's a lot of space between "intermittently beholden to some corporate interests" and "we won't have elections anymore and will violently round up our political adversaries." Neither is ideal but one is clearly better.

George Maschke

@baconandcoconut @WAHa_06x36 For me, support for genocide is a red line I am unwilling to cross.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@gwm @baconandcoconut Understood, and it sucks that you do not get a good choice on that, but, that's it: You don't get a good choice on that.

Trump is *much worse* on that than Harris, and a vote for Jill Stein helps only Trump.

George Maschke

@WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut My vote for Jill Stein will not help Donald Trump in any way.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@gwm @baconandcoconut I struggle to believe you are actually so naïve that you believe this.

George Maschke

@WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut A vote for Jill Stein does not add to any other candidate's vote tally.

DELETED replied to Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@WAHa_06x36 @gwm @baconandcoconut if you look at his profile... I mean he likely is that stupid.

And quite conservative.

George Maschke replied to Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut You seem to believe that I had an ethical duty to vote for Kamala Harris. That was never going to happen. She disqualified herself by supporting genocide.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎ replied to George

@gwm I don't think you had a "duty" to do anything. I think you wanted to do something - prevent genocide - and you made a choice that ended up hurting that goal. That has nothing to do with "duty", and everything to do with how things work in practice.

George Maschke replied to Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@WAHa_06x36 I don't see how voting for a candidate who supports a genocide will help to end it.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎ replied to George

@gwm Because that one candidate can have her mind changed, and the other can not, and risks ending democracy as a whole.

Brian Stafford replied to George

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut considering both Putin and Netanyahu are gambling on a Trump victory, it's fair to say a vote for Trump is a vote for genocide. Sometimes you need to hold your nose and vote strategically, not because you think Harris will be bad, but because electing Trump would be catastrophic. That is the eventuality to prevent.

DELETED

@gwm that's not how any of this works.

No single person alive has done more to thwart climate action than Jill "Princess of Grift" Stein

Mindsets

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut

The absolute vote tally—which you refer to, Mr. Maschke—is irrelevant in our system. The relative vote tally determines the winner, not the absolute vote tally.

So that's the flaw in your logic. Please let me know if you have any further questions.

NosirrahSec 🏴‍☠️

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut This is observably, demonstrably, incorrect in every context minus ONE. (the only one you're choosing to recognize)

You aren't CHOOSING to help Donald Trump, but your choice does help him when you take into account every other variable that is both obvious and historically repeated and documented.

Splitting the vote in close races is the same as, or worse, as supporting the worse option. This is a literal thing used and abused for decades now.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoiler_

This is not new. You are not going to disprove it by simply stamping your feet and crying like a petulant child.

Voting against Harris, as detestable as you believe it to be, is voting for Trump in effect. The degree of that effect varies depending on what state you are in.

Voting for Jill Stein, who has 0% chance of winning the election, is a vote for Trump by proxy.

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 @baconandcoconut This is observably, demonstrably, incorrect in every context minus ONE. (the only one you're choosing to recognize)

You aren't CHOOSING to help Donald Trump, but your choice does help him when you take into account every other variable that is both obvious and historically repeated and documented.

Joe Foster

@gwm Your vote for Jill Stein elects Donald Trump. You're trolling people with how bad this is.

baconandcoconut

@gwm @WAHa_06x36 American activists will not be able to continue advocating for an end to the atrocities in Palestine under a US dictatorship. The power to stop US support won't be about public opinion, it will be about the whim of one angry, all-powerful person who is willing to put activists in jail whenever he feels like it.

DELETED

@baconandcoconut @gwm @WAHa_06x36 counterpoint, they won't need to. If Trump wins there will be no Palestinians left to support.

Joe Foster

@gwm You support war crimes in Ukraine as Jill Stein supports the Russian invasion. Period.

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@gwm Look, there is literally a photo of her sitting down for dinner with him. If that is not enough for you I can not help you:

nbcnews.com/news/world/guess-w

George Maschke

@WAHa_06x36 Jill Stein attended a media event in Moscow in 2015. She was a speaker there and attended at her own expense. Vladimir Putin sat at her table for about fifteen minutes and pleasantries were exchanged. It takes strongly motivated reasoning to leap from this to the conclusion that Jill Stein is a "Russian asset."

Dag Ågren ↙︎↙︎↙︎

@gwm How many "media events" did Harris attend with Putin?

And that is far from the only reason, it is just the most blatantly visible one. Did you look at who else attended?

As for other reason, there are many: thirdway.org/memo/jill-stein-a

Go Up