Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
tarot bird

@mcc "a more privacy-conscious browser such as Google Chrome" is such a cursed phrase 🤢

We really need a new browser from someone that isn't in thrall to adtech, AI bullshit, or fascist politics

42 comments
tarot bird

@mcc same. I'm going to try it out, because I am so, so sick of this shit

worf
@mcc @morganmay works very well for me, been using it as my main browser for months
Chris 🦑

@morganmay @mcc thought the same. Isn't #Brave the go-to alternative for Chrome lovers?

Lunar 🛸 ♾

@sturmsucht @morganmay @mcc Unfortunately that's not safe either. Between the weird cryptomining feature and the transphobic CEO, there's a lot to go wrong there.

Chris 🦑 replied to Lunar 🛸 ♾

@lunarloony @morganmay @mcc Oh, didn't know that. The crypto bro thing is omnipresent of course. 🙄 Any links so I can read myself in?

Lunar 🛸 ♾ replied to Chris

@sturmsucht I misremembered - 'transphobe' wasn't quite the right word, but if he opposes gay marriage so strongly then it's not much of a stretch - ft.com/content/461bf398-47ee-1

And here's one about the cryptomining... or, indeed, how to use it: pcmag.com/how-to/how-to-earn-a

Adam

@sturmsucht @morganmay @mcc

I think "ungoogled chromium" is the go-to alternative for chrome lovers.

github.com/ungoogled-software/

But unless your a chrome lover you should be fine with an "unmozillad firefox" such as tor, mull or librewolf

Octavia con Amore

@sturmsucht @morganmay @mcc wasn't Brave's owner a fascist or bigot of some sort? :cat_think:

Chris 🦑 replied to Octavia con Amore

@OctaviaConAmore @morganmay @mcc

CIS white old man fears he is so sexy that a man would marry him unconditional. @lunarloony helped me with link
ft.com/content/461bf398-47ee-1

Raff Karva

@sturmsucht @morganmay @mcc

I recommend Mullvard Browser (collaboration between Mullvard VPN and Tor Project). After Tor, the second most private browser out there.

ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him)

@m3tti @morganmay @mcc text.tchncs.de/latenightblog/l

Couldn't easily find a better source, but basically a minor PR to change doc language to bs more inclusive blew up because tech is supposedly apolitical (it's not).

(roll m3tti) replied to ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him)

@chiraag @morganmay @mcc why can't people just leave all those politics and stuff aside. Don't we have bigger problems like that. Water gets short. We are heading to a new war and all those other really bad stuff thats happening. And here we are complaining about everyone and everything.

Sometimes i feel like being part of a medieval society that needs its scapegoats that they can shitstorm and talk about. Gossip is the thing today.

And the guy just wanted to write a browser.

mcc replied to (roll

@m3tti @chiraag @morganmay I am politics. My existence is political, because conservatives have politicized it.

If you want to leave politics out of the browser, that means leaving me out of the browser. I know how this shit works

eagerpebble replied to (roll

@m3tti Politics is how we function as a society. Nothing is apolitical. There are just people who are not negatively impacted by the politics of everyday life. Those people tend to be white, male, and live in Western countries.

tarot bird replied to (roll

@m3tti @chiraag @mcc *lists a bunch of problems that are the result of politics, then jumps into the mentions of people marginalized by politics* ”Why you gotta make things so political???" 🤡

Sing that song to someone who cares, Avril.

Octavia con Amore replied to (roll

@m3tti @chiraag @morganmay @mcc being apolotical only works for those with human rights protected by the current political majority :zerotwo_shrug:

and just for reference, here is a non-exhaustive list of various immutable aspects of me that are inherently political (and constantly under attack):
-woman
-trans
-bisexual
-disabled
-poc
-multi-national
-neurodivergent

Adrian Cochrane replied to (roll

@m3tti @chiraag @morganmay @mcc The other aspect here: Browser-dev is political!

Many of the decisions they're expected to implement in order to call LadyBird a "browser-engine" were made in the name of inclusivity. And not doing so correctly for a project with these ambitions can reinforce privilege.

Looking at their code I get the impression LadyBird respects "accessibility" & "internationalization" better than "pronouns", but they don't really seem to care about it.

Adrian Cochrane replied to Adrian

@m3tti @chiraag @morganmay @mcc I'll also add that there's other such efforts to build a browser engine!

Like Servo, Dillo, NetSurf, MicroWeb, & the commandline offerings. Then there's WeasyPrint for rendering to PDF. Servo's currently seeking funding!

Also I'm pursuing my own effort, & am preparing an effort to help get others involved.

LadyBird's not the only effort, though it feels like some get that impression.

Ramin Honary replied to (roll
> "why can't people just leave all those politics and stuff aside. Don't we have bigger problems like that. Water gets short. We are heading to a new war and all those other really bad stuff thats happening. And here we are complaining about everyone and everything."

@m3tti we are all subject to policy at all times. If you think at any time you are doing something separate from politics, what you are really doing is something that is in agreement with the status-quo policy. Since everyone agrees, no one ever need discuss politics, and that is nice and peaceful. But just because you and everyone involved agrees with the status-quo policy does not mean everyone who could contribute will agree.

This only becomes obvious when someone new shows up, especially someone who is harmed by status quo policy (typically someone in a minority group, e.g. gay, trans, non-white), you may learn that your behavior, which up to that point everyone agreed with, is harmful toward people in that group, for example, not treating them with the same dignity and respect you treat other members of the group (for example, because of race of gender).

How you choose to respond in such a situation is extremely important. You can choose to show respect to that person's individuality, and create new policy, if only for members of your group, in an attempt avoid behaving in ways that are harmful to this new person.

Or you can choose to demand the person who disagrees with you to conform to your politics, the policy of the status quo that up to that point everyone agreed with and never discussed. You might even accuse that new person of "bringing politics into our previously non-political group." But they did not bring in politics, it was already there, it was just there was no need to discuss it. Now there is a new person in the group, and a need to discuss politics. And to ignore their political disagreement as "bringing politics up where it need not be" is pretty disrespectful, especially if all they are asking for is to be treated with the same dignity and respect as everyone else in the group regardless of (for example) race or gender.

@chiraag @morganmay @mcc

> "why can't people just leave all those politics and stuff aside. Don't we have bigger problems like that. Water gets short. We are heading to a new war and all those other really bad stuff thats happening. And here we are complaining about everyone and everything."

@m3tti we are all subject to policy at all times. If you think at any time you are doing something separate from politics, what you are really doing is something that is in agreement with the status-quo policy. Since everyone agrees,...

(roll m3tti) replied to Ramin

@ramin_hal9001 this makes totally sense. Never thought about that before. And i appreciate that you made your point with no insults and respectfull. Thats how we should takle problems. I guess i was wrong that nothing is apolitical

Kirtai replied to (roll

@m3tti @chiraag @morganmay @mcc
Water security and war are *extremely* political thing.

buddhaha replied to (roll

@m3tti @chiraag @morganmay @mcc This thread is a text book example of the disadvantages of social media. Also smart people fall for it 24/7. Topics are discussed without enough knowledge on the subject and agreed on definitions leading to flaming each other (= anger & co.)

The question if "everything is political or not" is another shape of the thousands year old discussion between Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism. Instead of fighting better show empathy & digitally hug each other.

ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him) replied to buddhaha

@buddhaha @m3tti @morganmay @mcc Great non-answer answer. Others have provided concrete examples of how everything is political. Do you have an actual answer to that?

buddhaha replied to ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him)

@chiraag @m3tti @morganmay @mcc
my answer was that "everything is political" and "not everything is political" have both valid arguments and that the discussion is as old as human history. So who am I to decide who is correct if the most brilliant minds were not able to come to a conclusion yet?
So I wanted to emphasise that you should all try to understand the arguments of the other side instead of convincing each other. I am sure all of you have more that unites you than sets you apart.

ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him) replied to buddhaha

@buddhaha @m3tti @morganmay @mcc "Not everything is political" only works if you agree with the status quo, though. Because that's what "apolitical" is - the "default" (status quo) is good, so I don't need to think about politics. This only works, though, if you are part of the dominant group(s) in your society. If you are straight, "gay" is political while "straight" is apolitical. If you are a woman, gender becomes political.

1/?

ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him) replied to ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him)

@buddhaha @m3tti @morganmay @mcc It is easy to say that you're "apolitical" when you lie at the intersection of socially dominant groups (so in the US, that might be something like a white, straight, cis, able-bodied man). If you are non-white in the US, *your existence is political* whether you like it or not. If you are a woman in this country, your existence and your needs are political. If you are LGBTQ+, your existence is political.

2/?

ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him) replied to ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him)

@buddhaha @m3tti @morganmay @mcc I have the luxury of not thinking about my gender if I don't want to (as a man), but my wife really can't. I know nonbinary people who haven't come out fully b/c declaring their very existence is seen as a radical political act in much of the world.

Every single choice we make has *some* kind of effect (political, social, environmental, etc). Recognizing that just enables us to act to create a better world.

3/3

buddhaha replied to ಚಿರಾಗ್ 🌹✊🏾Ⓥ🌱🇵🇸 (he/him)

@chiraag @m3tti @morganmay @mcc As I said you have valid arguments and I agree. I agree with arguments for the contrary side too. This is not a binary topic and has multiple valid conclusions.

Your statements are based on your perspective that assumes the existence of free will and some causal determinism. That is not wrong but it is just one of many valid perspectives and without prior agreement on such foundations it is not possible to find a common ground. So why fight? Just to be right?

buddhaha replied to buddhaha

@chiraag @m3tti @morganmay @mcc Just want to add thank you! Last time I was actually intellectually challenged by another human was approx. waytoomany years ago. I did not think I'll mention causal determinism or moral cognitivism when signing up to mastodon.

(if I previously did I was usually blocked or ignored)

So, thank you for reading my crap and sharing your thoughts.

Ramin Honary

@m3tti Unfortunately, Andreas Kling, the project lead of Ladybird is also leaving a trail of evidence that he is a reactionary "tech bro."

Here is a GitHub is an issue correcting documentation to use gender neutral pronouns instead of "he/him". Andreas Kling closed the issue charging the person who opened the issue as trying to "advertise your personal politics." He does not tolerate gender neutrality, and uses the old "we don't talk about politics here" excuse as means to silence dissenting views. This is not a good sign, to say the least.

Ladybird has already been forked, by at least one person. I would encourage contributions to forks of Ladybird.

(Note: the picture that shows up here on Mastodon is of the contributor who opened the issue on gender neutral pronouns who was shut down by Andreas Kling, it is not a picture of Andreas Kling)

@morganmay @mcc

@m3tti Unfortunately, Andreas Kling, the project lead of Ladybird is also leaving a trail of evidence that he is a reactionary "tech bro."

Here is a GitHub is an issue correcting documentation to use gender neutral pronouns instead of "he/him". Andreas Kling closed the issue charging the person who opened the issue as trying to "advertise your personal politics." He does not tolerate gender neutrality, and uses the old "we don't talk about politics here" excuse as means to silence dissenting views....

Noah M

@morganmay @mcc any idea where Vivaldi sits in all this? they came to mind again recently and saw this encouraging blog post

vivaldi.com/blog/technology/vi

Go Up