Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
wet forest moon folklorist

bad reply guys are one of fedi/mastodon’s biggest problems.

I’m realizing it’s not only a demographic issue but a structural one with the platform. if people cannot easily see one another’s replies, and if the original poster can’t easily QT replies, someone with a popular post has to field dozens of nearly identical replies. if these replies enforce white supremacy or patriarchy (spoiler: they often do), the structure of mastodon tends to center and amplify white supremacy &patriarchy

67 comments
wet forest moon folklorist

we’ve all seen some amazing conversations unfold here but what you don’t see until you make a post that elicits hordes of replies, is how infuriating it is to get bombarded with carbon copies of the same idea you’ve already refuted 8 times. we need clear threading and an upvote system and yeah, QTs

wet forest moon folklorist

the tough thing is you just don’t really see it until you write a post that really extends beyond your own followers and into the nether regions of the fediverse. so one person can be ready to implode from dealing with this pattern while hundreds of others really have no idea that it even exists! not good and def an impediment to attracting some of the thinkers and writers we’d love to have in this space

Kameka

@seachanger you’re highlighting, IMO, one of the key challenges/issues with federation. Similar ideas/concepts can be surfaced across the fediverse, but not connected and amplified (to demonstrate support) because they’re decentralized and dispersed. It’s great to have democratization, but if there’s no simple way to aggregate or connect, then it’s less beneficial in the long run.

wet forest moon folklorist

@kameka yeah and compounded by inability to text search. I think there are ways to solve these problems but as we see on every single major platform, leadership does not necessarily want the same things as the user base. In theory, we should be able to have more influence as users here but theory is not always praxis!

Kameka

@seachanger in season 1 of social media, it was possible to “build it, and they will come” because it was a novelty. Unfortunately, for the new social media companies and platforms being built now, we’re in season 3 of social media. What users want is paramount to what companies and platforms want to build (especially since there is healthy competition for the same users). The past few weeks have been a live use case of this, IMO: Threads decreased engagement, Bluesky this week…

kuna

@kameka@mastodon.social @seachanger@alaskan.social While I agree with your broader point about the Fediverse, I think the invisibility of replies is something specific to how Mastodon (and similar server software like Pleroma, Misskey, and forks thereof) handle federation, but not forced by federation itself.

This can be already mitigated on the microblogging fedi by
https://a.gup.pe/ groups that create a bot that boosts everything posted to the group, making sure that everyone subscribed sees all replies. The forum (or reddit-like, as in Lemmy or Kbin) fedi bakes this into the software, by making the communities/magazines act as boosters of all replies. This doesn't work all that well with the microblogging apps, because while the guppe groups are somewhat manageable due to low traffic, if I (for example) subscribed to some moderately lively Beehaw communities, then my home timeline would be Beehaw upon Beehaw and nothing but Beehaw, most of it replies to post I don't care about. It would be nice to have something like an automated "silent boost" that just puts replies in my server for me to read at my own leisure, but not hammering my notifications and home timeline, but I don't know if this is in any way possible.

@kameka@mastodon.social @seachanger@alaskan.social While I agree with your broader point about the Fediverse, I think the invisibility of replies is something specific to how Mastodon (and similar server software like Pleroma, Misskey, and forks thereof) handle federation, but not forced by federation itself.

This can be already mitigated on the microblogging fedi by
https://a.gup.pe/ groups that create a bot that boosts everything posted to the group, making sure that everyone subscribed sees all...

ms. information

@seachanger everyone is baffled when i explain that private/dm replies from reply guys drove me off this platform for months

wet forest moon folklorist

@gren ugh I’m so sorry. I feel kind of terrible because for the first year I was here I just didn’t experience it in the same way that I have on other platforms. I’m so used to being bombarded on FB and twitter by White Men Who Explain Things to Me that mastodon actually was a blissful relief. Until my posts started getting more boosts and then suddenly I understood. They are like an infinite army of robot soldiers sprinting toward my defenses lol. Shoot one and more appear

Craig Maloney ☕

@seachanger I have a reputation of writing disclaimers on the tail end of my posts asking folks to not reply with certain things. Sometimes it's done very tongue-and-cheek, but the main onus for it is I've gotten the same damn replies from folks before and they were just as unhelpful then as they would be on any new post.

There's a lot of folks that want to help people, but much like a crowd rushing to help one person it can turn into a stampede.

DELETED

@seachanger serious question sorry do the "unlisted" and "followers only" buttons help at all? I just found out about unlisted

I think "follower only replies" allowed or more control over that

It's something a) I struggle with and try not to do even though I can be yappy and b) one of my favorite people on Mastodon or really in the whole world gets absolutely fed up with this shit

wet forest moon folklorist

@Robotron I think they actually don’t help. If deployed on the post they limit reach. If deployed on replies they may prevent others from seeing that their concern has already been addressed

DELETED

@seachanger I remember when I first came to masto in Sept there were huge massive discussions pro and anti QT but yes that would absolutely help

Upvotes too although if it worked like reddit, right, no one would see an oft down voted stupid reply and then think "hey! No one's schooled this person on this cromulent fact" [adjusts fedora]

Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)

@seachanger Are you sure the problem is that replies aren't visible? And not just that the kind of people who interact the way you've described tend not to look, read or care whether their point has been addressed (because it was never about that).

wet forest moon folklorist

@tokyo_0 i think it’s both. All social media platforms are filled with people who don’t respond thoughtfully, but the degree to which they impact the person with the post is mitigated in various ways across different platforms. the problem here is not just demographics or visibility but also user control over audience

Sarah Burstein

@seachanger Yeah, I've seen a bit of this and the invisible, repeating reply guys are exhausting.

Genuine question, though: How do you see QTs helping here? I've had some luck adding replies to my original post (something like a P.S.) to add clarifications/answer common questions. But most of my repeating replies aren't from people who follow me, so they wouldn't see the QT anyway. I'm guessing you're envisioning some kind of different situation, then? Always appreciate your thoughts.

Sarah Burstein

@seachanger And just to be super clear (for anyone out there who might want to start some Discourse) I'm not reflexively anti-QT. Just curious.

wet forest moon folklorist

@design_law One thing people did on Twitter is pull up annoying replies with a QT so that everyone can actually see it, and deal with it publicly. It takes a lot more work to do that here and this is what I saw people of color talking about last fall—they are being treated one way in the replies, but a lot of people just have no idea what’s even happening leaving the original poster feeling alone/vulnerable/bombarded

wet forest moon folklorist

@design_law but another person in tbr replies here did remark that even that had limited effectiveness for them personally so 🤷🏼‍♀️

Another Angry Woman

@seachanger speaking as someone who had (has?) a moderately popular account and many viral tweets in The Other Place, these features absolutely do not mitigate having the same reply 1000 times over, because the issue is people just think their point is Special and Unique so will make it over and over nonetheless; it's simply a product of reach.

wet forest moon folklorist

@stavvers so to you it feels the same across platforms? I felt like twitter was kinda good at hiding “low quality” replies

Another Angry Woman

@seachanger from my perspective, it absolutely was not and once a tweet got Out There it would be the same replies over and over, maybe people replying to the top two bad replies and replying-all so there's now an argument in the mentions (arguably even more annoying). And then if it gets to big, it would be QT-ed, which led to even *more* of the same replies and same QT notifications.

The only actually good feature twitter had in curbing that was being able to switch off replies.

Another Angry Woman

@seachanger that said, the QT feature was very cathartic from my end, meant I could pick a couple of bad replies at random and set my followers on them, but in my experience it was never, in any way, constructively helpful to stopping the reply thing because at the end of the day it's just jerks being jerks

Another Angry Woman

@seachanger tbh I feel like the problem you outline is broadly a human problem - experienced fedi users *know* that not all replies show up - especially abusive ones - and that's a product of how federation *works*, so the big problem isn't threading or quoting to increase reach, but white users denying there's a problem to sweep it under the carpet.

DELETED

@seachanger I wonder if there are mastodon alternatives that allow someone to disable commenting on a post by post or account level basis. That can allow people to make clear if their posts are open for discussion or not. I wonder if #calckey might add support for this.

Marie M.

@franktaber @seachanger I'd LOVE the option to limit replies to individual posts (e.g. no replies/ followers only/ people you follow), per Twitter

Antifa Warlord

@adhdmarie @franktaber @seachanger For what it's worth, there's been discussion among the mastodon discord development channel about the need for limited reply settings for posts in order to be compatible on a technical level for Threads federation, so hopefully we get follower-only, following-only, mutuals-only modes sometime soon.

Dendan Setia (Nins)

@adhdmarie
Based on the calckey alt I have on kitty.social, you can determine both original posts and boosts at different visibility levels, that should control for comments too for now. And for that instance (idk if this is *key-wide), there's a local-only option too. So there's public/unlisted/followers/local/direct mention. It's not quite mutuals but there's that.

I know bonfire is still in alpha but apparently quite stable, they do intend to have tiered access the way g+ had circles.
@franktaber @seachanger

@adhdmarie
Based on the calckey alt I have on kitty.social, you can determine both original posts and boosts at different visibility levels, that should control for comments too for now. And for that instance (idk if this is *key-wide), there's a local-only option too. So there's public/unlisted/followers/local/direct mention. It's not quite mutuals but there's that.

moondog548

@seachanger is there a mechanism to hide (or even delete) individual reply comments? That would be great. Especially if a memo could be left behind (e.g. "addressed elsewhere").

QT would definitely be helpful, but I'm not 100% sold on the pros outweighing the cons yet (unless you can control the QT-ability of your own posts).

Anyways, I'm #NewHere so my ignorance is genuine at least. 😜

wet forest moon folklorist

@moondog548 not yet on the main mastodon platform. Maybe as newer competitors emerge in the fediverse we’ll see some shifts here in terms of user control over replies

Joel VanderWerf

@seachanger At the very least there should be a "fetch more replies" button and when you click "reply" there should be an alert encouraging you to "fetch more replies" first. Wouldn't solve all the reply problems, but might reduce redundancy.

wendinaokland

@seachanger There’s quote tooting (?) on Mona, the iOS apps, and likely some other iOS apps (Ivory or Ice Cubes?). And your post can be targeted at a ltd audience, but that can be easily overridden with a click (even unintentionally)

Jon Bosak

@seachanger
Thank you for raising this issue. I find it frustrating that I can't see what it is you're responding to. I'm the sort of person who learns by example rather than from explanation, so until I can see directly what the problem is, I can't really understand it. It's like listening to someone talking on the phone; I get the outrage, and I believe it's justified, but I can't wrap my head around the situation as a whole. If there are tech solutions to this, I'm all for them!

wet forest moon folklorist

@bosak I hear you, it is really difficult to understand a complex social interaction you’ve never experienced. Still, we have to try and get better at that around here!

stephaniepixie 🏳️‍🌈

@seachanger And even when one uses an app that shows threads and replies more similarly to the bird app structure, many others don’t so their experience isn’t the same in the Fediverse.
That’s definitely a frustrating part of this platform if the intent is to have a wider reach.

wet forest moon folklorist

@stephaniepixie yep. That’s why all the “just use this app or extra fix on this other website” don’t help. We need the changes at the core of the platform so they’re universally experienced

stephaniepixie 🏳️‍🌈

@seachanger I wonder if that will ever be possible if there are so many ways to enter and participate in the Fediverse.
Even if everyone on the Mastodon app experience same thing, many others participate here using other apps and they won’t necessarily follow the same features as the Mastodon one.

I don’t know much about tech to know how this can ever be more universal without a centralized site like the corporate ones.

Maybe this just isn’t the right design concept for experiencing a wider audience without the replies getting out of hand.

@seachanger I wonder if that will ever be possible if there are so many ways to enter and participate in the Fediverse.
Even if everyone on the Mastodon app experience same thing, many others participate here using other apps and they won’t necessarily follow the same features as the Mastodon one.

I don’t know much about tech to know how this can ever be more universal without a centralized site like the corporate ones.

wet forest moon folklorist

@stephaniepixie yeah idk. I’ve seen this site change a lot in 6 months so I’m generally optimistic about it, but I’m also just starting to really grapple with some of the structural patterns that hold it back

stephaniepixie 🏳️‍🌈

@seachanger Same. I see more variety in styles of posting now than even 6 months ago but maybe I just branched out a bit once I found my comfort zone. I don’t know.

It totally suits my personal socializing needs but I can see how it’s not really functionally right for experiences beyond a cosy bubble.

For more thought debates and journalistic type of posts the QT feature, more clearly defined threads and word search are absolutely imperative. Relying on hashtags doesn’t cut it.

My understanding is that QTs are coming to the main Mastodon site but not sure about the appearance of threads or word search.
It’s better on the Mona app but it’s a mess in just about every other app I’ve used.

@seachanger Same. I see more variety in styles of posting now than even 6 months ago but maybe I just branched out a bit once I found my comfort zone. I don’t know.

It totally suits my personal socializing needs but I can see how it’s not really functionally right for experiences beyond a cosy bubble.

wet forest moon folklorist

@stephaniepixie yeah agree with all above tho I use ivory and threads work ok, but are still kind of clumsy feeling. I’m committed to this space for the time being, as a user and an admin, but that commitment does come with hefty responsibility to organize improvements and be honest about structural problems

Steve🏳️‍🌈

@seachanger In thinking about this, I haven't quite been able to figure out yet if the tech issue is an underlying structural or operational problem. Structurally, ServerOps may ban or limit content from other servers - which would hide some replies from some viewers. Operationally, smaller or under-resourced servers will suffer from queue lag, so replies may not appear in a timely manner on the user's insurance. Overall, I agree that more controls are needed to limit or deal with replies - and there are numerous suggestions being voted on and considered in the development repository. I'm glad people are calling out these issues, as it's the only way we can push for improvements.

@seachanger In thinking about this, I haven't quite been able to figure out yet if the tech issue is an underlying structural or operational problem. Structurally, ServerOps may ban or limit content from other servers - which would hide some replies from some viewers. Operationally, smaller or under-resourced servers will suffer from queue lag, so replies may not appear in a timely manner on the user's insurance. Overall, I agree that more controls are needed to limit or deal with replies - and there...

Chumchum Tumtum

@seachanger that's an interesting dynamic I hadn't considered

wet forest moon folklorist

@fcktheworld587 right? It sails right by unless you have a popular post that critiques things lol

Fani Willis, Jr.

@seachanger

There are big voids, and there are smaller voids. Scream your thoughts into either and expect equal effect, as the differences in their echoes are meaningless.

Black Chic with the Red Truck

@zombiecube @seachanger
I kind of doubt that actual reply guys ever ask themselves that question. They just assume they are the most correct in every conversation.

Joy Denebeim :tv: :tb: :pa:

@seachanger I think you need to be more liberal with the ban hammer. Don't be afraid to block instances that allow people like that on them.

I personally never see any of the things you're saying. I can't remember the last time I saw a pro nazi post (once, there's never 2, it's once/report/block for me)

Jeff Shaffer CBET, ret

@denebeim @seachanger That’s been my experience, too, though I don’t get a lot of replies so maybe I’m just boring. This social media site is my first since I walked away from FB in 2016, what I’m finding is a very progressive politics from the folks I’m following, lots of original art and great tech support when I run into a problem. So far, I have had to mute or block two or three voices and reported two to my admin. I’m just using a Safari browser on my phone and glad to have so much to enjoy. Very interested to see the discussion about different apps and features continue, there’s a lot I don’t understand but I appreciate them more with all this context

@denebeim @seachanger That’s been my experience, too, though I don’t get a lot of replies so maybe I’m just boring. This social media site is my first since I walked away from FB in 2016, what I’m finding is a very progressive politics from the folks I’m following, lots of original art and great tech support when I run into a problem. So far, I have had to mute or block two or three voices and reported two to my admin. I’m just using a Safari browser on my phone and glad to have so much to enjoy....

Can-crisociality 🦀〰️🥫

@denebeim I can't speak for @seachanger but often in my own experience, this isn't about Nazi stuff--an easy block--but about just annoying "certain people haven't had occasion to think much about this problem and center themselves in ways that much more subtly reproduce problems for other kinds of users" replies. Those, one can block out of annoyance--no one is owed our attention--but the platform-wide problem isn't then addressed at all.

Joy Denebeim :tv: :tb: :pa:

@inquiline @seachanger I'm not sure how to address that. Now I'm in a different category of attacked groups, but trans people tend to be geeky. Plus we're almost all progressive and 'woke', and know when to give up the floor.

So, it's probably the people I follow, I mean I'm sure your mastodon experience is very different depending on who you follow. And the reach of your server.

I suppose if you're on a big server there's local bad actors, but again, geek who runs who own server.

wet forest moon folklorist

@inquiline @denebeim and I do think if more people practice mute/block with notification to other users “muting you because…” as a final reply, it will stifle their reach. A lot of people are just barely realizing we can and should enforce personal boundaries with glee on the internet (thx patriarchy). This coupled with strategic technical tweaks could def help us address the impact over time

Grrrr, Darth Moose Shark

@seachanger And this is why I want to hit people (with a sturdy foam bat) who say you shouldn't block or mute people over here.

You absolutely should, and early, because there are fields full of reply guys out there and cutting them off from you at the least and at the root if you're an admin is both easy and necessary.

Gelt-Seeking Gastropod 🐚

@grrrr_shark @seachanger

I've thankfully only had to do this a few times. Being unpopular is so restful.

wet forest moon folklorist

@grrrr_shark if more of us had server rules discouraging reply contrarianism maybe these guys would be frightened into silence. But that’s a big lift and maybe too far for a lot of admins? Someone must be doing it

MrCopilot

@seachanger Wondering aloud the effectiveness of a #UI #UX implementation disabling/greying out the reply button until you have read the parent thread to the bottom. Not unlike a terms of service, eula type workflow.

No matter it's effectiveness, expecting a "Thanks, we hate it" response from users.

🔶Mark Nicoll 3.5%🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇪🇺🇺🇳

@seachanger if the problem is that those posts can't be seen, how can it also be a problem that those same posts are being amplified?

wet forest moon folklorist

@duckwhistle can’t be seen *by the full audience*

amplified for *the user*

having problems that are invisible to others is hard

deilann

@seachanger i have linked & shamed the worst of replies and it was effective (it's not a full solution, but just saying that it has been effective for me to link & shame)

deilann

@seachanger this isn't super effective for reply guys, unfortunately because they're usually not the worst of replies

(like, i'm talking about when people tell me that my frustration regarding accessibility and image descriptions makes them want to purposefully exclude blind people from the internet levels of the worst)

i wonder though if there is some value in aggregating the reply guys as links to point it out

obviously, still doesn't fix the root of the problem, but might at least make me feel better when it's overwhelming me

@seachanger this isn't super effective for reply guys, unfortunately because they're usually not the worst of replies

(like, i'm talking about when people tell me that my frustration regarding accessibility and image descriptions makes them want to purposefully exclude blind people from the internet levels of the worst)

deilann

@seachanger i have trouble thinking it's folks who can't see the replies because typically when i get hit with reply guys they're usually on the same few instances, so would be able to see each other

but my demographic of reply guys aren't the same as POC deal with

looking at popular toots or just in general POC accounts with large followings on other instances is honestly painful

i feel like more people should do that sometimes

just see what things look like via mastodon.social

Can-crisociality 🦀〰️🥫

@seachanger One way I handle this sometimes is replying and boosting my reply. Then sometimes my followers will also reply to that person. I'm not sure of all the affordances at play but I think it can increase odds both the reply-er and maybe other would-be reply-ers will get the message. (Ironically I'm going to do this now, but not bc I think you need more replies!)

Go Up