Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Eugen Rochko

Making people pay to tweet should be the nail in the coffin for #Twitter; but then again I thought turning it into a glorified Parler would've been that nail already. As they say, the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.

105 comments
cowboyminer :coolified:

@Gargron

Kind of a Stockholm syndrome .. or a version of battered wife syndrome

Adam

@Gargron because most users have a curated feed they've spent years you can still go there and not see all the worst garbage, so I think until he does something insanely dumb like make it paid access people will still maintain accounts there. At least until bluesky gets video and dms.

ladyteruki

@Kels_316 @Gargron : except the constant algorithm tweaks and the prevalence of the "For you" tab (which is the default, sometimes even resetting) mean that curation is more and more difficult to maintain.

Adam

@ladyteruki @Gargron I never use it, only use 'following' and haven't had the issue with it resetting, but I don't use the app, only the web interface since tweetdeck went paid only

ladyteruki

@Kels_316 @Gargron : indeed on the browser version it doesn't seem to reset, I did notice that. But everytime I used the app (now uninstalled), it was like playing Russian Roulette.
Well, Saudi Roulette I suppose.

screambiogenesis

@ladyteruki @Kels_316 @Gargron I used to use Ublock Origin to block the "trending" display and other page elements that tried to push on me stuff that I had no interest in seeing. Stuff like that helped make it even easier to built a firewall around oneself.

...at least before the diarrhea golem took over, anyway.

ladyteruki

@screambiogenesis @Kels_316 @Gargron : I like the trending display but only because I've set it to monitoring worldwide trends. I made sure to unselect every bit of customization I could. That way I can see what random TV show is trending in Japan or Brazil or wherever, when it is XD But admittedly this wouldn't work for everyone because you also see tons of trends in languages you don't speak and/or about topics you know nothing about and... some people don't like that.

screambiogenesis

@ladyteruki @Kels_316 @Gargron Sure, things like that have their uses. But I was using Twitter exclusively to keep up on a specific musical niche, so anything outside of that was of no interest. I never really 'hung around' there.

I also recall seeing a lot of ragebait-type stuff there before I blocked it, but I never knew it had settings, so maybe I could have fixed it another way. Oops.

ladyteruki

@screambiogenesis @Kels_316 @Gargron : it's absolutely a matter of preference, and I believe that no two users use(d) Xwitter the same way and/or for the same reason anyway.
I just meant that sometimes non-specificity is another way to evade the algorithm. If it can't pinpoint you it's harder to target you. An anti-curation of sorts.

Michael Slade

@Gargron Too many websites have the dead bird link on them to change quickly.

gio ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น

@michaelslade @Gargron
@Kels_316
Yes, unfortunately until most of the reporters, journalists, media people don't jump ship, people will stick to 'X' because of the curated feeds... I saw some of them starting to use #mastodon at the end of last year (edging their bets...) but they have now gone back to the 'old bird'...

Jack Yan (็”„็ˆตๆฉ)

@giosci @michaelslade @Gargron @Kels_316 Itสผs so bizarre to me as a publisher. We removed our Facebook links and gadgets weeks before the Christopher Wylie exposรฉ in The Observer. We removed our Twitter links and gadgets at the end of 2021. It was obvious where things were heading so why would we want that brand association? We joined the fediverse in 2016. Evidently most of my media colleagues think differently and believe itสผs worth being seen next to OnlyKlansสผ name and a simplified swastika.

Voron

@Gargron @giosci @Kels_316 @michaelslade weirdly enough, even though people like us love the journalists & news and thatโ€™s what journalists talk about.
Sports is actually the biggest driver of activity on the xTwitter site.

writermonki

@Gargron Are there any recent numbers for Twitter's, or X's, current user base? It seems to have lost some cultural cashe. Maybe that's just from my POV.

Ipso Facto

@writermonki @Gargron Musk recently claimed 550 million users. So that means itโ€™s much, much lower.

AmonTheMetalHead

@writermonki @Gargron active users vs bots & sleeping accounts would be telling

JacobRPG+ ๐Ÿซ˜

@Gargron "As they say, the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."

At this point, wouldn't the market remaining irrational be the only hope for the bird place staying solvent?

Oumazi Kutlwano

@Gargron WHERE TF ARE THESE DEVELOPERS. FUCK ELON.

THIS IS THE CHEAPEST MOVES IVE EVER SEEN MADE BY BIG TECH

Mori

@Gargron Heh #Twitter = #Parler nice burn coming from Masto creator ๐Ÿคฃ

Robert Mizen

@Gargron dude people were still using lastpass after 3 public hacks and leaks. So my faith in Twitter going down is minimal.

Michael Bishop โ˜•

@Gargron I can see people are unwilling to leave that other site because they have such a large reach. Most everyone I follow there are climate scientists of which a few created accounts here but then abandoned them. I don't think they will jump ship over there until they can reach as many here.

๐–ข‰๐–ฅฃ๊›š๐–ข‰๐– ข๐–ฆช๐–ฆช๐–ฅฃ๊›˜

@MichaelBishop @Gargron reach and interaction is very different. Twitter may have better 'legacy' reach but my experience here is better interaction.

Michael Bishop โ˜•

@KilKerrin @Gargron that may be true but in the case of climate scientists, like many others, they are just trying to get in front of as many eyes as possible. There are far fewer eyes here compared to the other site.

Mama H

@MichaelBishop @KilKerrin @Gargron
True, but climate scientists are more likely to attract negative attention and death threats on Twitter vs. here. It's going to get to the point where the only audience on Twitter is the type of audience that isn't going to listen to scientists anyway, and it will be like they are screaming into the void. In fact, it's probably pretty close at this point, but I wouldn't know because I left that hell hole months ago.

SteveBologna

@Gargron Itโ€™s actually evolving into Grindr for nazis

Darnell Clayton :verified:

@Gargron #Threads is trending as a response to #ElonMusk hinting that #X will become a premium site.

I believe #Musk will do this around the same time he ditches the #Twitter domain for x.com (currently the latter redirects to Twitter).

My prediction: tens of millions (re)join Threads, & millions of others choose #Mastodon, #Misskey & #Pleroma.

Under #Elon, X becomes a smaller, profitable, conservative social hub for the world, catering mostly to politics.

Juan C. Torres

@darnell Any idea when he will stop using twitter domain?

Darnell Clayton :verified:

@orthoheterodox1 It depends on Elon Muskโ€™s mood. It could happen next year, next month, or next week. Elon is erratic.

Juan C. Torres

@darnell very true. I hope he does it sooner than later.

ja2ui0

@darnell @Gargron

I hope you are right, Darnell. Twitter was always pretty trashy, even under Jack. Especially so under Elon. I hope he takes it private and plunges to the depths of Truth Social levels of engagement.

I hope that the sane people wake up and move off social media altogether.

But if they stick around, Mastodon is a great choice.

Darnell Clayton :verified:

@jq @Gargron What is surreal is how discussions on #Twitter / #X are mirrored in real life.

Currently, there is one powerful group who refuses to leave Twitter: politicians. Not just in America, but worldwide.

Sadly, many world leaders seem hesitant about leaving Twitter as they desire Tesla plants in their own countries (& want to avoid upsetting Elon).

ja2ui0

@darnell @Gargron And isn't that completely fucked up? Do they need to spray paint the flags red?

Elon should be allowed to hold a social media platform just like anyone else. But when governments feel beholden to his whims for that or any other reason, it's time for trade regulators to start pumping the brakes.

DELETED

@darnell @jq @Gargron politicians tend to be surrounded by political "minders" and consultants advising them on their social media strategy.

These consultants have bet their cred and expertise on Twitter and are loathe to throw that all away.

ja2ui0

@danjac @darnell @Gargron

*flips down the welding mask and slowly reaches for the Bernzomatic*

Darnell Clayton :verified:

@danjac @jq @Gargron I just witnessed the leaders of #Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ & #Turkey ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท (governments who do not like each other) both request that #ElonMusk build #Tesla plants in their respective nations.

The United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ needs Musk for #SpaceX & #Urkraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ still relies on #Starlink (I believe the civilian population needs it more than the military).

X will probably be the political epicenter for the next few years (I believe other groups will abandon X, though).

ja2ui0

@darnell @danjac @Gargron I don't really care about Tesla, I hear their cars are garbage. But I'm aware of several competing manufacturers and Tesla defined the standard for US charging stations. That's progress.

We're headed in the right direction with electric, but I'm not buying anything Elon is selling.

As far as Starlink, we should have employed NASA for that exercise and not allowed Musk to put thousands of satellites in LEO under his control. That was a stupid, stupid mistake.

DELETED

@jq @darnell @Gargron the Starlink affair is because of prevailing ideology of the past decades to cede more and more government functions to the private sector.

ja2ui0

@danjac @darnell @Gargron Understood, but that doesn't make the idea less stupid.

If governments have one job, it's to protect and, to a limited degree provide for, their populations. Internet is as important to modern society as water and electricity. It's a utility and the government should guarantee access to it.

In my opinion.

Yes, we fall short on health care and regulations on basic utilities, but we had a real "walk home" opportunity and we whiffed it. Maybe on purpose. Still stupid.

Darnell Clayton :verified:

@danjac @jq @Gargron The US government is not very innovative & has always relied on the private sector for innovative technology (this applies to both NASA & the US military).

There were several rivals to SpaceX but they were lazy & arrogant (Boeing, Lockheed Martin & Blue Origin).

Same for Tesla too as Elonโ€™s rivals are having production issues & threats of strikes from unions.

ja2ui0

@darnell @danjac @Gargron It's too bad about these character limits.

We can save my distaste for capitalism for a different time.

The US government has programs for funding things it thinks it needs. They fund contractors to build bridges, schools, etc all the time. They don't have to be innovative and they can rely on the private sector. We just need to be more strategic on who owns the infrastructure and bills for it after it's built.

Starlink should not be controlled by Elon Musk.

DELETED

@jq @darnell @Gargron yes, when Boeing builds an airplane for the USAF, it doesn't get a say in where that plane gets used.

ja2ui0 replied to DELETED

@danjac @darnell @Gargron BINGO.

If Starlink built a satellite Internet provider for the US, or better yet The World, and Elon couldn't withhold service from Ukraine, wouldn't that be nice?

ja2ui0

@darnell @danjac @Gargron just so we're clear, Starlink shouldn't be controlled by the US either. Unfortunately we're not quite living in a Gene Roddenberry society yet so "the world" can't really own anything.

We should work on that.

Darnell Clayton :verified: replied to ja2ui0

@jq @danjac @Gargron How much control over a product depends on the contract set up when an entity buys the product.

Apple, Tesla, & Starlink (via SpaceX) retain great control after a client purchases their product.

Governments signing those contracts are begrudgingly obliged to follow them or risk losing access to those products & services.

It's a classic power move.

DELETED replied to Darnell Clayton :verified:

@darnell @jq @Gargron right, this is the difference and what I mean by ceding control to the private sector.

It's one thing to hire contractors to build a school. It's quite another to have privately-run (but publicly-funded) schools.

ja2ui0 replied to DELETED

@danjac @darnell @Gargron It's possible I inadvertently derailed that line of conversation so I'll put it back right now.

I'm interested in governments building schools. I'm not interested in governments sanctioning, and supporting, superstition as education.

We can fund the building and we can set completely independent educational standards. Funding a building is not a tacit or explicit endorsement of what goes on inside. That's separate.

ja2ui0 replied to Darnell Clayton :verified:

@darnell @danjac @Gargron That why I'm suggesting that we need a world group, or at least a coalition of national governments, who protect (that is their job) against those private abuses.

You used Apple as an example, so not to pick on them, but let's go with it. If Apple wants to retain control, backdoors, etc, the controlling entity has a kill switch. Fuck with us, we'll just push the big red button. And we won't let you have so much control that doing so would be catastrophic. Just inconvenient.

ja2ui0 replied to ja2ui0

@darnell @danjac @Gargron since you brought me back, Dan, I get a chance to clarify and will take advantage of that.

The whole world order seems to be companies and government fighting against each other. The closest we ever got to cohesion in recent history was coronavirus.

Just imagine.

How great could we be as a human society if we didn't rely on threats to react, and instead behaved like an, I dunno, probably crazy, GLOBAL HUMANITY.

Completely doable. Capitalism and religion prevents it.

ja2ui0

@darnell @danjac @Gargron If you're savvy, and I have no reason to think you're not, consider what kind of MITM / DNS poisoning Elon could do right now with Starlink.

He might have no motivation to do so, but the fact that he has that level of control over so many peoples' Internet experience is nauseating. And we were all like, sure, put a shitload of barely vetted pot metal in our atmosphere and sure, you can control it however you want.

Ipso Facto

@darnell @Gargron It will never be profitable. If he charges for access, heโ€™ll lose everyone left of center. Advertisers will pay less for a platform that only appeals to a smaller demographic.

Gabriele Pollara

@darnell @Gargron yeah, i think that seems likely, and as long as all those services #Threads, #Mastodon et al are interoperable to a degree, then team #ActivityPub may be a real 'winner'

Agree re #X / #twitter remaining a hub for politics, or maybe more breaking news in general, given that Threads is actively unkeen to promote current affairs disinformation. That could be where the fragmentation crack happens.

Sven Kortmann

@Gargron There is no alternative for the normal user. Mastodon? No. Bluesky? Too small, too uninteresting. Maybe when threads from Facebook arrive in Europe, but only maybe.

plsburydoughboy (I/het/him)

@Gargron well, nobody in your replies told you: that was misinformation based on a bad faith interpretation of something Elon said in an interview twitter.com/Dexerto/status/170

nilesh

@Gargron WhatsApp just launched channels. And I'm already seeing some influential folks migrate from Twitter to WhatsApp.

Illiterate

@nilesh @Gargron Can you share some examples of their channels? Iโ€™m interested in seeing how well it works.

Deborah Robinson

@Gargron Something tells me he just wants a private club. The ability to manipulate markets and politics is what he is after. Power hungry. Large ego. I could be wrong, but what he has done makes no sense to the majority.

David Schmidt

@Gargron There are similar comparisons in different areas. Sometimes makes you feel your optimism fools you.

Deborah Robinson

@Gargron Also, he's lost a shit ton of advertising revenue. That's what happens when you bite the hand that feeds you.

Ikuno Towatari (็”Ÿ้‡Ž ๆˆธๆธก) ๐Ÿง โ‹† ๐Ÿญ ๐Ÿ•Š๐ŸŒป๐ŸŽ€
เธเธฒเธฃเธ—เธณเนƒเธซเน‰เธœเธนเน‰เธ„เธ™เธเธณเธฅเธฑเธ‡เธˆเนˆเธฒเธขเน€เธ‡เธดเธ™เน€เธžเธทเนˆเธญเธ—เธงเธตเธ•เธ„เธงเธฃเน€เธ›เน‡เธ™เน€เธฅเน‡เธšเนƒเธ™เน‚เธฅเธ‡เธจเธžเธชเธณเธซเธฃเธฑเธš Twitter เนเธ•เนˆเนเธฅเน‰เธงเธญเธตเธเธ„เธฃเธฑเน‰เธ‡ เธœเธกเธ„เธดเธ”เธงเนˆเธฒเธเธฒเธฃเน€เธ›เธฅเธตเนˆเธขเธ™เนเธ›เธฅเธ‡เธกเธฑเธ™เธญเธฒเธˆเธˆเธฐเนƒเธซเน‰เธเธฅเธฒเธขเน€เธ›เน‡เธ™เนเธšเธš Parler เธ—เธตเนˆเน„เธ”เน‰เธฃเธฑเธšเธเธฒเธฃเธขเธเธขเนˆเธญเธ‡เธ„เธ‡เธˆเธฐเน€เธ›เน‡เธ™เน€เธฅเน‡เธšเธ™เธฑเน‰เธ™เนเธฅเน‰เธง เธเน‡เธญเธขเนˆเธฒเธ‡เธ—เธตเนˆเน€เธ‚เธฒเธงเนˆเธฒเธเธฑเธ™ เธ•เธฅเธฒเธ”เธชเธฒเธกเธฒเธฃเธ–เธญเธขเธนเนˆเธญเธขเนˆเธฒเธ‡เน„เธฃเน‰เน€เธซเธ•เธธเธœเธฅเน„เธ”เน‰เธ™เธฒเธ™เธเธงเนˆเธฒเธ—เธตเนˆเธ„เธธเธ“เธˆเธฐเธฃเธฑเธเธฉเธฒเธชเธ เธฒเธžเธ•เธฑเธงเธ—เธณเธฅเธฐเธฅเธฒเธขเน„เธ”เน‰
Jonathan

@Gargron I think calling the market "irrational" is not the solution; I genuinely think this is how just the market for social media works

gvs
The first is an issue. But allowing free speech online is a GOOD thing. Your walled gardens of extreme leftism is unappealing
Hunter Perrin

@Gargron Honestly, anyone still on Twitter at this point likes the shit theyโ€™re swimming in, so I donโ€™t see it changing much.

suseng_26

@Gargron Who knowsโ€ฆ I certainly wonโ€˜t pay but that will also mean that Iโ€˜ll lose some longtime twitter friends who just arenโ€˜t capable to move to other platforms for various reasons. DMs and group chats via DM have been an integral part of my twitter experience. That cannot be replaced unfortunately.

Olivier Simard-Casanova ๐Ÿฆ‹

@Gargron It probably is, I have some data that suggests the network externalities of X have already started to unravel

A platform this big doesnโ€™t collapse overnight. Even if its network externalities unravel catastrophically, it would still take a bit of time (a few months maybe?).

In my opinion, the data is consistent with what they would be if X were unraveling

DELETED

@Gargron Speaking of solvency, maybe you're not the right venue for this but can you about imagine you're cremated, ashes in a balloon like a gender reveal. but also in your balloon are countless 'minis' of messages in bottles, if you will, for the alcoholic now afloat. okay but so you're ashes. minis of messages. and helium. so you're set out upon the sea to see. i fword love that right there, gus. Thanks for the prompt. <3 Messages to find. Later.

DELETED

@Gargron
And Elon is one of the most unreliable announcers in CEO history.

Remember the experts panel that should've decided Trump's re-activation?

And how much he hates ads? Months later he hires a CEO whose one and only expertise is selling ads.

Stefano Marinelli

@Gargron Many users are deeply attached to their community and follower count. For them, size matters more than content, and they'd even pay to maintain their position as "influencers" of varying degrees, or to keep interacting with such influencers. No matter how irrational it may seem, many follow the herd, viewing determination and irrationality as signs of strength.

Lil Meow Meow

@Gargron

Too many people do not give a damn about the fascist owner as long as their own narcissism is catered, finding all kinds of excuses.

Doesn't bode well for the fight against fascism no matter where.

BobbingAlong

@Gargron with his ad revenue down, if he wants to claw back some of the money he's spent, he's going to have to do something like this. It's going to come down to the implementation. In my view he'd be better to apply a throttle, say 10/20/30 free messages or replies per day, and pay $1 for each thereafter. That may then catch commercial operators.

samuelmederos ๐Ÿƒ

@Gargron Algunos rondamos ya casi los 200โ‚ฌ por la lรญnea de Internet, hacer pagar a la gente que crea su propio contenido es un robo. Ayer elimine mi cuenta de X. Es el clavo y al fondo del mar.

Rage Against Leaves

@Gargron you should have Mastodon say something funny abt it on X again

Rage Against Leaves

@Gargron I wont log in any more but if u havent yet u should

KFClinton

@Gargron

It is almost a year since X is under new RWNJ management.

If they didn't leave by now, with the horrific things we've read about Elmo and his actions, then they will gladly continue to support him for a few bucks a month.

Matthew

@Gargron are they making people pay 13 years of my lifes work on refugees and war zone monitoring is over i got banned for having the same conversations i had for 13 years about the value of human life sadest thing every record wiped away

Qibili

@Gargron I left twitter to join mastodon yesterday because there's no way I'd pay to be on social media. Elon is delusional.

zoyyy929

@Gargron I understand your frustration with Xโ€™s decision to charge all users for accessing the platform. You may feel that this is unfair and limits your freedom of expression.

Prem Kumar Aparanji ๐Ÿ‘ถ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ˜

@Gargron if there's a view for messages from a list of users that I can create, and share for others to follow, I can get the best benefit of Twitter over here itself.

josh :bocchi_arch:

@Gargron the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent, is a great saying. I'm going to start saying it more often.

welkin ga ๐Ÿ“Œ ๐Ÿ’งโš–๏ธ

@Gargron at this point it isn't a nail in the coffin anymore it's sealing the coffin shut, cementing it, and mummifying it

JW prince of CPH

@Gargron To be fair, though, it's two very different "final nails" - one is about content, the other is about people's wallets. It's one thing to accept rubbing butts with literal nazis & people are apparently willing to bear the social & conscience costs for it - but it's another entirely when doing so costs actual money that you have to work to earn...

Pollik

@Gargron There was a time when I would agree about being the nail in the coffin, but now I am not so sure. Subscription is around the cost of video streaming subscription...not like to break the bank for fans.

TanekRune

@Gargron Personally, I'd like to go back to a world where when someone says "I'm on X," the proper response is to hand them some water and see if they know where to get some shrooms.

DELETED

@Gargron

"Would you have been a resister in Germany or France during WW2?"

"What are you doing on or about Twitter? Are you still on it? We you permanently banned? Yeah you wouldnt have done shit"

Mercurius Goldstein

@Gargron
It does make me wonder how this, specifically, would precipitate quittingโ€ฆwhat sort of people would be like โ€œI can tolerate sharing this platform with Nazis, but I draw the line at paying a buck a monthโ€?

RaysOfRed

@Gargron well, if you want to get banned from Twitter, better do it now. I suggest @-ing Elon Musk repeatedly with what you really think about him.

mellowfish

@Gargron about half the people I used to follow on twitter donโ€™t want to move to mastodon, and I canโ€™t stand being on an algorithmic platform like threads. Some corners of twitter are still great and probably will be until the service completely implodes.

scaryericmakes

@Gargron this mixed with being unable to block people I think will be the end of the whole thing. It's crazy people can watch what Musk is doing and then still say he's smart with a straight face.

Richard W. Woodley NO THREADS ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŒน๐Ÿšดโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ“ท ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ

@Gargron
#EvilElon will keep his new toy afloat until he gets bored with it, or after the next American Presidential Election whichever comes last.

TopKnot

@Gargron
No one said people on Twitter are rational and sane people. Also, recent history shows conservatives on Twitter are neither intelligent nor sane considering their party's hero gets more popular as he collects more criminal charges and indictments.

Ian Gaynor-Kirk

@Gargron itโ€™s the hassle of moving thatโ€™s kept it going so far. Charging will kill it, but which rival service will take the crown, as Highlander said there can be only one!

Royce Eddington

@Gargron I think until BlueSky is open access, Twixxer will still be able to get away with things like user fees. Mastodon is just not โ€œmassโ€ user friendly yet.

Rage Against Leaves

@Royceeddington @Gargron

#Megalodon again becuz its crazy how good it is. the left sides a custom tag timeline

Rage Against Leaves

@Royceeddington @Gargron and hes not really twitter is dying just really slowly while ppl move on to other places.

i checked in for a bit on and off until it became too much to even do that. ppl know where to find me

DELETED

@Gargron done with X, I'm on Mastadon now with my little gaggle of 42 followers but I feel much cleaner and no nagging feeling to shower or wash my hands after posting

Preston MacDougall

@Gargron #Twitter :birdsite: is now #Xitter ๐Ÿšฝ, a 'pay toilet' to be precise. Seems legit ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

gigantos

@Gargron I suspect the issue is that nobody posts their breaking news on any of the other platforms. All the exciting news posters that break some special thing in a thread still only use twitter.

k cavaliere

@Gargron I suspect that the next eccentric #Musk maneuver, when this monthly subscription/blame it on the bots fails, will be "pay per tweet".

๐ŸŸฆ๐Ÿง™๐Ÿปsimp

@Gargron I heard a lot of people telling me: They are not affected by all the fascists and nazis in the slightest, since their community isnโ€™t part of โ€œgeneral twitterโ€ (whatever this means). But I cannot believe theyโ€™d be willing to pay Musk directly, would they?

DELETED

@Gargron

I was permanently suspended from Twitter/X merely because I repeated some bad things about Tesla cars I'd seen in the news & Consumer Reports; & in the same post I quoted the price of Dogecoin which Musk is fond of.

Go Up