Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Luci for dyeing

things user/profile systems fuck up, bad assumptions
- the user will never delete their account
- the user should be expected to individually delete their posts
- the user will never change their legal name
- the user will never change their email address
- the user will never change their phone number
- if they do change those things, surely they will think to use our change info ui before getting rid of their old name/phone number/email address
- the same as above, but with SSO linkages

18 comments
Luci for dyeing

- the user will never die
- the user will never be arrested
- the user will never be subject to search and seizure

Luci for dyeing

- the user will never want or need a copy of their data
- the user doesn’t need or want their data in any standard easily readable formats,
- some json or xml blob should be good enough right? that’s standard and readable, right?

Luci for dyeing

- the user wishes to have their identity be immutable and persistent - that is to say, continue to be associated with old posts , analytics data and content regardless of the number of name and identifying info changes, thanks to “helpful” permafingerprint algorithms tracking the user across identity changes.

Luci for dyeing

- the user will never have a stalker, an abusive ex, or angry internet mob
- the user probably doesn’t mind having their full legal name and list of postal addresses listed on the public web a google searcg away. i mean, it’s public data right? information wants to be free dude. you can just unregister to vote if you don’t like it.

Luci for dyeing

- the user database will never be hacked or leaked

this one is interesting from the perspective of: if you start from the assumption your user database definitely will be leaked: what design decisions do you make differently

Luci for dyeing

These 6 things are different things, not the same thing. they do not require each other nor are they required by each other.

Luci for dyeing

- the user doesn’t care if their profile is indefinitely indexed by search engines by any and every old name they have ever had.

Luci for dyeing

- the user is definitely some binary gender
- that gender is definitely something you need to collect
- that gender will never change

Luci for dyeing

- you can enumerate all the possible genders without leaving anyone out

Luci for dyeing

I mentioned I had a list to someone who happens to be a product manager of a major identity system, who was interested in having a meeting with me- as a trans woman, about how to make these things more inclusive.

is there anything here on my list that I have missed?

Δῃάνειρα replied to Luci for dyeing

@zens the user wants to be your user; doesn't instead wish to interface with your design and have capabilities to maintain their own, independent, unobstructed store of information which includes but is not limited to that provided by your design.

Luci for dyeing replied to Δῃάνειρα

@deianeira thanks for that, that sorta goes against the premise of the reason for this system’s existence; which is why i should definitely bring this up.

Cass replied to Luci for dyeing

@zens Some of my favorite assumptions:
- the user's computer meets X spec
- the user owns a computer
- the user has exclusive access to an internet connected device
- the user can receive out-of-band messages (sms, etc.)
- the user will always be in a position to communicate both in and out of band at the same time
- the user has power and an internet connection at all times
- the application can use as much of the user's compute resources and communication bandwidth as it needs with no limits

Cass replied to Cass

@zens I realize these are not in the same vein of gender and identity as the rest of your awesome list, but I'm always bothered by the quiet classism I see in a lot of tech, and I think avoiding that is vital to true inclusiveness

Cass replied to Cass

@zens Some more bad assumptions, actually about identity this time:
- there is no legitimate reason for multiple physical beings to share a single identity
- there is no legitimate reason for a single physical being to have multiple identities
- a user's identity can be validated by some official authority
- the user can produce any piece of official documentation of their identity

Luci for dyeing

- the user is fine with a permanent and immutable URL being generated from their full name.

Luci for dyeing replied to Luci for dyeing

- the user has a title
- that title is definitely one of the ones on this list
- that title is Mr.

thanks to @chris_evelyn for this one

Luci for dyeing replied to Luci for dyeing

- The user has a fixed home address

- the user is never in a foreign city and never will be mugged, their wallet and phone will never be stolen from them

- the user will never drop keys down the drain

- the user is not homeless, with a phone that has just died, and their only computer is a public access library computer running Internet Explorer 6.

- the user is able to afford a monthly subscription to Bitwarden

via @alexandria

anarchism.space/@alexandria/11

Go Up