|
Top-level
 @darius I'm intrigued by this idea, and a big believer in the positive effects of interacting in small(er) community groups. In real-life community is everywhere, and ppl + communities interact in a complex social fabric. I feel community might be better expressed online, and for a while I'm posting about a "Community has no Boundary" paradigm. On SocialHub I mention an AS/AP vocab extension on top of Group + Actor. Would be great to have your input on the topic. 22 comments
 @humanetech @hamishcampbell This is all very much of interest to me. Are you aware of my "neighborhoods" work? (It's not a formal proposal because I'd rather build it first, see how it works in practice, and then make a proposal)  @humanetech @darius @hamishcampbell though it's not the usual-for-Mastodon "instance = community". In the end, I want to blur the lines between instances as much as technically possible. @grishka pity I couldn't join SocialCG.. spent 2 hrs before in EC webinar prep call, which I expected would be 0,5hr. But I'm reading the meeting notes 😃 @grishka @humanetech @darius The is a good discussern to be had about tech around - the whole, groups and the individual. power/community/sovereignty etc. A great article that is related to this is now on frontpage of HN: https://www.projecthorseshoe.com/reports/featured/ph18r8.htm It's in context of game design, but the social relationships explained are interesting well beyond that. @humanetech @hamishcampbell @grishka ahhh coauthored by my old colleague Erin! This is bound to be good, she's very smart  @humanetech @darius @grishka @hamishcampbell @redchrision “so when you as an admin were peering with another instance you are showing your set of values, and if that other instance believes that they are sharing those values, that instance can peer with you” and redaktor would like to do this as well. Had a meeting with Cristina too cause for redaktor would like to work on a trust pattern everybody can use. @darius @humanetech @grishka @hamishcampbell @redchrision yes. And I would like the idea of having an interoperable set of human values and principles so that it would also work e.g. Hometown <-> redaktor – Some ideas for redaktor regarding limiting power and establishing trust (it's a mess) :
[DATA EXPUNGED]
@jalcine my patreon is where I occasionally post ideas like.... every three months tops. Don't feel obligated, you'll get the good updates just following what I release!  @celia @darius oh yeah, you're right! I thought it could be the hometown docs too, but I don't see it there https://github.com/hometown-fork/hometown  @darius This sounds similar to what Scuttlebutt is doing, no? Neighborhood and "pubs" rings a bell. |
Gregory's Server
@darius
One thing to consider is whether communities explicitly defined allow for taking the concept next-level on the fediverse.
Now it is mostly implicit i.e. instance boundary, discourse forum, etc.
An explicit definition as a domain model, allows modeling things on top of that when needed, such as Membership + Roles, or Governance.
( @hamishcampbell started talk on the latter which - if federated - would require a meta-model AP extension to define policies. See https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/what-would-a-fediverse-governance-body-look-like/1497/51 )
@darius
One thing to consider is whether communities explicitly defined allow for taking the concept next-level on the fediverse.
Now it is mostly implicit i.e. instance boundary, discourse forum, etc.
An explicit definition as a domain model, allows modeling things on top of that when needed, such as Membership + Roles, or Governance.