@darius@evangreer I've been hearing from another attendee. Mace's presence invalidates the event. She is unacceptable to have on stage.
I hear Kellyanne Conway is on stage now. So that's going well.
US House Rep Nancy Mace, a noted anti trans legislator, was speaking on a panel at the Project Liberty Summit. She was disrupted by @evangreer .
I was walking out of the room when it happened. It was awesome. Evan is doing okay.
@darius@evangreer I've been hearing from another attendee. Mace's presence invalidates the event. She is unacceptable to have on stage.
I hear Kellyanne Conway is on stage now. So that's going well.
@darius@evangreer Audibly gasped at her comment at the end. What a hateful, awful thing for Mace to say. Thank you for standing up for what's right, Evan.
(The letter doesn't name the company, but a commenter recognized it - as did I, while reading the letter - and the letter writer confirms in the comments.)
@shauna I am a South African of roughly Mark's age and I can say that SA is fixated on school results. In school it was drummed into us that results equal work/destiny.
Every CV has to have the them. Not sure why but it's still real today with CVs and job listings here.
@shauna Yeah, I'm an extremely qualified candidate and the Canonical process was extremely laughable. But my story isn't anything interesting compared to ask-a-manager.
@evan missed the poll but my answer is there should not be an organization to govern the fediverse; there should however be at least one organization to enable many forms of governance in the fediverse
@darius I think encouraging various forms of governance on the Fediverse is awesome. I also think we're probably going to see many, many more offline entities like universities, local governments, postal services, and enterprises setting up their own instances. What do you think an Organization to Promote Fediverse Governance Models would do, though?
@trwnh A common sort of blog post is a review, sometimes of a post on another blog. They typically include links, quoted texts, screenshots, or video clips of what is being reviewed, so you can understand the review without going directly to the material, but with the explicit option to do so.
A quote post on a microblog is like a review of another microblog post or thread.
As someone else said, it is a deliberate change of context, making it a special case of a reply.
(1/2)
@trwnh A common sort of blog post is a review, sometimes of a post on another blog. They typically include links, quoted texts, screenshots, or video clips of what is being reviewed, so you can understand the review without going directly to the material, but with the explicit option to do so.
A quote post on a microblog is like a review of another microblog post or thread.
To me, in Smithereen, it's a link preview that's getting some special treatment and that you create with a dedicated UI. The difference between quotes and link previews is that I don't do link previews yet. The semantic relationship is the same as when I link something in my own post. To quote something means to include it as part of your own post, possibly adding your own comment, to have a conversation about it with your followers.
@andypiper that's awesome. It'll definitely be extremely helpful for Smithereen β I do need a geographical database for several features that a social network of this style "must" have. That's at least the education section in profiles (schools, universities, etc), and venues in events.
I was contemplating how I'm going to try to pull something out of OSM and/or have a community of my users maintain it, now I don't have to. The only problem is that this dataset must be terabytes in size.
In this video, I explore how data visualization can distort our understanding of voter preferences- with insights from Phil Warren, an image scientist and artist, and quotes from @hankgreen & @Vox videos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK26KlBX-0Q
the paper really should be called "People who don't give a shit one way or another react ambivalently to output of billion-dollar machine designed by hucksters to trick people into thinking its outputs are plausible exemplars of textual artifacts in a specified genre" (the study participants were crowd-sourced online and paid less than a living wage)
this is a big soapbox topic for me but my argument is that the larger medical community, through systemic sexism, created the monster of the anti-vax movement and the larger "big pharma, bad"
like this isn't even a particularly big extrapolation
the literal pitch of pseudo-feminist goop-branded anti-medical wellness in the 2010s was "doctors don't listen to you, we listen to you, we believe you when you tell us something is wrong:
it's affinity fraud, basically, but affinity fraud that was enabled by an already eroded sense of trust in clinicians who ignore women's testimony of their own experiences
if there weren't a lot of women who'd been basically treated like they were delusional for talking about the pain they were in or for the fact they could tell something was wrong, only for them to finally get validation once the problem becomes an actual emergency, there wouldn't be a population ready to hear "doctors lie to you, dismiss you, ignore you---so when they say vaccines and hormones are safe, why should you believe them?"
this is a big soapbox topic for me but my argument is that the larger medical community, through systemic sexism, created the monster of the anti-vax movement and the larger "big pharma, bad"
like this isn't even a particularly big extrapolation
the literal pitch of pseudo-feminist goop-branded anti-medical wellness in the 2010s was "doctors don't listen to you, we listen to you, we believe you when you tell us something is wrong:
... looks like this is actually my first original post on here, two years after joining π