Gregory's Server@darius @humanetech intresting.
|
12 comments
  @humanetech @darius @hamishcampbell though it's not the usual-for-Mastodon "instance = community". In the end, I want to blur the lines between instances as much as technically possible.  @grishka pity I couldn't join SocialCG.. spent 2 hrs before in EC webinar prep call, which I expected would be 0,5hr. But I'm reading the meeting notes 😃 @grishka @humanetech @darius The is a good discussern to be had about tech around - the whole, groups and the individual. power/community/sovereignty etc. A great article that is related to this is now on frontpage of HN: https://www.projecthorseshoe.com/reports/featured/ph18r8.htm It's in context of game design, but the social relationships explained are interesting well beyond that. @humanetech @hamishcampbell @grishka ahhh coauthored by my old colleague Erin! This is bound to be good, she's very smart  @humanetech @darius @grishka @hamishcampbell @redchrision “so when you as an admin were peering with another instance you are showing your set of values, and if that other instance believes that they are sharing those values, that instance can peer with you” and redaktor would like to do this as well. Had a meeting with Cristina too cause for redaktor would like to work on a trust pattern everybody can use. @darius @humanetech @grishka @hamishcampbell @redchrision yes. And I would like the idea of having an interoperable set of human values and principles so that it would also work e.g. Hometown <-> redaktor – Some ideas for redaktor regarding limiting power and establishing trust (it's a mess) : |
@darius
No, I wasn't aware. It looks like a great concept. With your permission I will reference this toot on SocialHub.. is there a link to these docs I can also include?
Community domain should be quite basic. Probably instance-bound initially, crossing instance barriers later on.
Ppl from #valueflows are also interested: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/standardizing-on-a-common-community-domain-as-ap-extension/1353/16
Others too, probably. Solid community?
PS. Note that @grishka with #smithereen is also looking into creating 'cozy' community.
@hamishcampbell
@darius
No, I wasn't aware. It looks like a great concept. With your permission I will reference this toot on SocialHub.. is there a link to these docs I can also include?
Community domain should be quite basic. Probably instance-bound initially, crossing instance barriers later on.
Ppl from #valueflows are also interested: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/standardizing-on-a-common-community-domain-as-ap-extension/1353/16