190 comments
@EposVox As an addendum to this: most authors are not only genuinely delighted to share their work with you if you request it, some are even moreso delighted to talk to you about it and answer questions! Especially if they have additional knowledge or information worth sharing that they didn't include in the original paper! @thypon @EposVox Sure thing, but sci-hub has had no updates since somewhere in 2021. :( Even checking out my own work turned out to be tough: https://mastodon.social/@tinyspheresof/109511810239429992 @EposVox so who hosts the data, and what are the peer review consensus validation systems? If it’s already free then why are the publishers worth billions of dollars? Everyone says web2 solves this just fine and then kind of just don’t account for the fact that taxpayers are paying to paywall their own research they funded so a few pointless companies can make billions of dollars in the process? How can anyone be OK with this?! @EposVox we should be academically careful to separate crypto profiteering from decentralized distributed consensus building systems with content addressable data. I see so many people in tech throwing the baby out with the bath water on these topics right now and I can’t wrap my head around it. We’re defending a system right now that almost no one I’ve ever spoken to perceives as just, or financially responsible. @risottobias @EposVox so subscribe to every universities rss feed and then locally index the data to make it searchable and just search out peer review results independently? That seems very practical 🤣 @Torfinn @EposVox same problem exists in both a private journal - and for web3 would still exist in the form of "if there's no university to make the content, it doesn't end up on web3" - both twitter and web3 rely on others to add value http and RSS are just a means of transmitting data a university website is a relatively cheap billboard to put things on. @Torfinn @risottobias @EposVox *sigh* What level of redundancy is acceptable to you, and how many trees are you willing to burn down to get that level of redundancy? Because IMO a file hosted on a few thousand servers is about as redundant as I could practically imagine. @mav @risottobias @EposVox YES!!!! IPFS content addressable data has the potential to unscrew up so much of the ridiculously unnecessary storage practices we’ve just chosen to accept as how things are done. It’s relieving to see someone get it in the wilds out here. If you haven’t seen it I’d highly recommend Joe Armstrongs(RIP) computer science talk “the mess we’re in” @mav @risottobias @EposVox I wasn’t even attempting to address this problem but it’s a huge one that shockingly most folks building systems today don’t even conceive of as a problem because it’s just the “options we have” @Torfinn @risottobias @EposVox I guess I didn't even really consider IPFS as 'web3', since it's a totally reasonable solution to a real problem instead of grafting a blockchain on a currency and calling it revolutionary That said, you could accomplish many of the same goals with, say, SyncThing. Or rsync, if you're feeling particularly masochistic. @mav @risottobias @EposVox everyone that built or is presently building new features for IPFS certainly consider it web3 😜 in fact I’d say most of us think it’s one of the most important web3 primitives. It’s certainly not web2 that’s for sure. @Torfinn @mav @risottobias web 2 and web 3 are marketing terms so you’re going to have a hard time avoiding association with bullshit used for marketing when using marketing terms @EposVox @mav @risottobias when you have an entire tech stack that requires browser plugins to even access I think it’s reasonable to call it more than marketing. Maybe once a browser can natively support some of these primitives we can have that argument but for now there’s an entire translation layer required to even try. Brave is getting there @Torfinn @mav @risottobias I mean… there’s plenty of protocols that have been around for decades that don’t work in common web browsers lol Web3 as a concept is just marketing, was my point. It’s not like we’d only still be on the 2nd version of the web or something lmao @EposVox @mav @risottobias that’s fair. However, arguably this is an entire ecosystem of interdependent protocols which build on one another. I wouldn’t exactly put some one off open source project that presently has no real adoption in that same category. What would you call all this stuff? NFT’s, IPFS, decentralized finance? These things couldn’t be further apart in data model/schemas but simultaneously they leverage the same tech stack/principles. @mav @EposVox @risottobias I have to ask have you actually read the IPFS white paper? https://github.com/ipfs/papers/blob/master/ipfs-cap2pfs/ipfs-p2p-file-system.pdf @risottobias @mav @EposVox so what you don’t like about web3 primitives is that they prioritize digital chain of custody and you disagree with digital ownership? @Torfinn @risottobias @EposVox creating digital scarcity from objects that shouldn't be scarce is more capitalism. In a world that needs a lot less capitalism. So this gets into things that I would call "evil" DRM is bad and so is this. @Torfinn @EposVox @risottobias I haven't no. Please tell me it doesn't use a blockchain. @Torfinn @risottobias @EposVox yeah, I'm uncertain how you tell the difference. I really thought 'web3' was synonymous with 'blockchain'. So is SyncThing web3? @mav @risottobias @EposVox id never looked into this but this doesn’t seem much different than a distributed hash table at least in principle. So if I were forced to describe this I’d call web2 tech stack leveraging a web3 primitive with the block protocol they describe. We do something like this with our IPfS network indexer building a blockchain if announcement messages leveraging mostly web2 stack but a web3 primitive @mav @risottobias @EposVox to be fair this is an argument people building have all the time. Where is this project at in a x, y, graph of decentralized/distributed vs centrally usable. It never ends. There are endless vectors to explore in this topic. @Torfinn @mav @EposVox web3 is anything that attempts to use coins and hype itself (ipfs is halfway there with ipns) - kinda like fediverse is activitypub Self hosted things like syncthing or tor or ssb just say "this is my public key, this is my router, say hello" So: radicle is a distributed git server, that uses both ssb (as a transport protocol, which is fine) and ethereum (well, "rad") as a governance token - so yes it's a wasteful blockchain @risottobias @EposVox worth a side note that google is definitely looking into leveraging IPFS to make scientific research more permanently open and available. So, I guess so long as google is the arbiter of these web3 technologies you’ll be ok with using them? 😏 @risottobias @EposVox seems to me from doing some reading that a lot of Indieweb will also be hosted eventually on IPFS and resolved through IPNS. @Torfinn @risottobias my big problem with everything you’re saying is that there’s no technological limitation that web 3 would be solving here. The problem is in the institutional structure and publishing status quo @EposVox @risottobias absolutely web2 technologies are the base layer that most decentralization will be built on. The primary purpose of web3 is rearranging the incentive models and empowering individuals to participate and own rather than centralized monolithic profit motivated institutions. @EposVox @risottobias tCP/IP what any the problem with the web. The problem with the web is location addressed data, unnecessarily duplicative storage, and the majority of incentive systems being built on selling advertisements to users by spying on them. There’s no web2 primitive that’s motivated at all to fix these. @EposVox @risottobias I maybe should’ve prefaced this with the statement that I’m not implying that web3 has solved these problems, but that it’s presently the best avenue we have towards solving them at least in my eyes. @EposVox @risottobias one might rightfully argue, are these really problems for which we should be seeking technical solutions? I’d empathize with that argument but simultaneously feel as if we’ve almost no other choice. @EposVox As the author or co-author of various scientific papers: don’t I know it. AND, you have to pay them a publishing fee if they accept your paper AND the scientists who review the papers (which I have also done) are also unpaid. Huge racket. @EposVox All the more reason to look for diamond #openaccess journals to publish with, like most journals with library publishers. Check out https://doaj.org for those and more. @EposVox authors even have to pay to have their paper published in most cases their institution pays the publication fee or it is considered in grant proposals but still it's money that could be spent on personnel or materials @EposVox Wait, what even is the purpose of these journals in the age of the internet? Are you seriously paying to have a PDF put on a website? @EposVox yes. Authors pay the publishers to get their papers published and readers pay the publishers to read @EposVox oh, wow! I really wish I had known this. I frequently have to search out "alternative sources" for papers. Just asking the author sounds better for everyone! @EposVox: The relevant hashtag, once popularised on the bird site that's now pining for the fjords, is #ICanHazPDF. A question was asked elsewhere: > What's something that seems obvious within your profession, but the general public seems to misunderstand? @EposVox re-tooted one interesting answer to this. Thanks! See this post's thread. For my own answer: New mathematics is being created all the time. (I was a research Mathematician some time ago and loved it.) @EposVox Not to mention that authors generally have to pay the publisher as well, while peer reviewers work as volunteers without getting paid. @EposVox It is upsetting that ResearchGate demands university affiliation, since that is the easiest way to email researchers with these requests. @EposVox@glitch.lgbt
Elbakyan is a schizoid sperg (who thinks that Stalin is literally god) but she does a great job maintaining sci-hub :agooglethumbsup: @EposVox To be fair publishing is a lot of work, and includes copy editing and other things that do add value. I have family that works in publishing and some articles need tons of polish. They also pay for hosting for open access articles which any author can opt-in to (for an added fee sometimes) @EposVox also using SciHub is good and should be permitted for everyone... @EposVox and we do. Sometimes the authors never respond to emails. As a self employed, independent researcher it’s a challenge digging sometime. @EposVox I never even considered this. There are so many papers I never read because they were behind a paywall that was unaffordable for a school paper. But I always thought the authors were paid from those fees, not that all of it went to the publisher. Do they get compensated at all for publishing? @EposVox Does this include curious laypeople who have nothing to offer in terms of exposure? I hit a lot of paywalls trying to read papers just out of curiosity :( @EposVox I'm no academic, but from what I read, academic publishing is a huge scam. From how they review them to access, to even getting published. All the money seems to flow to a single point. @EposVox Don't think you need to be part of academia either. I, an interested lay person, have asked for and received papers on numerous occasions. @EposVox I've heard this information before, but how would you suggest wording that you want access to the paper? I know it doesn't need to be 100% professional, but a teensy guide would help for my times of deep research @EposVox I knew about the authors not getting a penny but didn't realise that the authors would be happy to provide a free copy. @EposVox I did this when I needed an article for my MA thesis. My uni didn't have access, friends at different unis had the same problem... Didn't know this was allowed, so I felt bad about approaching the author directly, but sent him a polite email, explaining the situation. Received a very charming reply within hours, PDF of what I needed attached, he even expressed interest in my thesis topic. #Teachers, #researchers are amazing and they work way too hard @EposVox Find them on https://www.researchgate.net/ and you can send a request directly to the author. @EposVox my phd supervisor told me it was rude to email an author directly. Plus it shows that you work at a bad university because apparently it could not afford a subscription. @EposVox when I was young researchers used to publish unedited draft on their website. @EposVox I did once find a paper made by someone from the uni I attend to, maybe even the same association, but it was over 20 years old so they had already left, probably bo one remember them. The trace stopped there as the name was too generic to track down. I may continue later, but it's not urgent. @EposVox It seems ludicrously high for a few pages. @EposVox I've actually done this before! Needed the full text for that study that said the US is an oligarchy that was in the news a few years back for an org project. I found the text but didn't have rights to use it, so I emailed the authors and both gave me permission! @EposVox Honestly that's what I did when my friend published a paper a while back. They want to share. I've heard it's costly to pay a publisher for the rights to allow readers to be able to download the paper for free. The publishers make big money. @EposVox Absolutely true! I've emailed authors to ask for papers a couple of times recently, and they responded almost immediately and were delighted to send them. The vibe I got was "OMG, YOU CARE ABOUT MY RESEARCH???" 💕 One guy offered to send me some of his other papers too. I was actually a little worried he wasn't going to leave me alone. :) No kidding! Just yesterday I needed to find a paper written !!50!! years ago but all I found was "pay here", "pay there", money, money, money. Want porn? Here! Free! Want knowledge? F you, fork over the money! No wonder the masses have nothing but jello between the ears!!!! 😡😡😡 @EposVox @epiceneVivant this is true of most humanities and social science researchers I know as well. @EposVox in the 1980's I was an enthusiastic innocent when I emailed David Goldberg in the USA to ask about his papers on genetic algorithms I was amazed to receive a box full of them sent free to me in Cambridge UK. A side effect of this was of course that I read them. (1980's some had email on our desks but paper and snail mail was still king) @EposVox@glitch.lgbt I hate that science is pay-walled like this... while misinformation news sites are always free. @EposVox i have used this several times successfully. One author mentioned that the study I was looking for was quite old so she sent me that paper and three more recent ones she'd worked on that were related to my work. Sci hub is always there for you but I prefer this way; it lets you connect to researchers. @EposVox I've actually sought out people who I think would like the topic I've written about, and sent it to them 🤓 @EposVox Didn't know that. I always figured it was like anything else, that they got an (albeit small) cut. @EposVox just today I was listening to a RadioLab episode from a few weeks ago about this exact industry. It’s a great dive into how it works and how it’s evolved in the last few years @EposVox this isn't open information. they might do it (many won't respond), but afaik they don't own copyright, and are not allowed to send copies for free. They also change their email address often so probably your email will bounce. They're just trying to justify propping up this ridiculous extractive publishing model @EposVox So the payment isn't for the content, but for marketing and distribution. Would that article even been found without marketing and distribution of the publisher? \begin{rant} Weird and wrong that paywalls are allowed to exist. Tax dollars paid for the research, authors pay thousands for a paper to be published, taxpayers expected to pay again to read it. It's on-line, people, distribution is free, not printed, not a book. \end{rant} @EposVox depends. Some Publishers like #Elsevier literally demand exclusivity for #Copyright and most Universities will demand granting them exclusive copyrights to peoples' thesis. I KID YOU NOT! @EposVox this is an older code but it still checks out. I never ever heard of a scientist who wasn't willing to share their research. @EposVox this is probably a silly question but: If the researchers don't make money from publishing, and peer reviewers aren't paid since they're volunteers, what incentive do researchers have to engage with journal publications? @EposVox True Story! If you went to college, it's likely your alum library privileges work, too. Sign up for your alum email address. Now you have a login and a password to try when you hit the "Institutional Access" button next to the paper you're trying to read. If you went to grad school, or even took a certificate program, try that email too. If you live near one of your schools, more papers are available if you're on the campus network, with the same login. Keep a list & visit campus. |
@EposVox Eye opener for me. Appreciate the heads up and will take this to heart going forward. ♥