What if the real answer to permacomputing is less computing, and not increasingly esoteric conglomerations of arbitrarily chosen hardware and language paradigm? :blobpeek:
What if the real answer to permacomputing is less computing, and not increasingly esoteric conglomerations of arbitrarily chosen hardware and language paradigm? :blobpeek: 17 comments
@eli_oat My read on permacomputing is that the question it implicitly poses is something like, "How do we extricate this gadget-based hobby that is so compelling to us from its complicity in burning the world, in a way that increases what makes it compelling and pleasurable to us?" That last part is at odds with a kind of austerity or post-apocalyptic thing inflecting some of the projects, but I actually think it's a great question that more creative domains (e.g. music) should pose. @eli_oat I read a good perspective, possibly on my timeline here, about how the best preparedness action you can make for any future disaster is to really get to know your neighbours now. It stuck with me. Also while I was messing about with LoRa depth sensors for our old water tank a neighbour used to measure with an old broom handle. Increasingly (in my more nihilistic moments I guess) I can't see much of a use for computers outside of capitalism and hobbies. @eli_oat always has been! It is about using computation only when it has a strengthening effect on ecosystems. @320x200 @eli_oat "using computation only when it has a strengthening effect on ecosystems" is literally the second sentence on the permacomputing page on xxiivv wiki, but I don't think anyone takes the time to read anything anymore, making it more explicit on the pmc won't fare much better. All the discourse about pmc nowdays are putdowns aimed at some sort of vegetarianputation disconnected from anything envisioned on any pmc documentation anywhere, the failure is not in the wiki pages. @neauoire There's a powerful difference between articulating constraint and tendency. Constraint: "Use computation only when it has a strengthening effect on the ecosystem." This can seem overwhelming, because we're talking about intrinsically non-linear systems where consequences are hard to predict. Tendency: "Try to make yourself less and less necessary to the functioning of the ecosystem." Oh cool, now I know which way is up! @neauoire @320x200 @eli_oat chiming in to share that "what is permacomputing?" has been on my mind for the past months, despite reading both pmc.net and xxiivv wiki; for me it has predominantly been "a vibe" i wonder if in the future there will be a well-defined category twinning with pmc, e.g. consider agroecology: the well-defined study of agriculture within ecological bounds and logics. compare it to permaculture's lack of clear boundaries & definitions, at least wrt academic usage afaiu :) @wim_v12e yes yes, usually computation is used to solve human problems(sometimes animal problems too, often both) |
Also, to be wicked clear, this isn't to yuck anyone's yum, nor stop anyone's projects! I think a lot of the projects in the permacomputing space are rad and great and a lot of fun but maybe the wind under their wings can sometimes be that they're fun and interesting and not that they're gonna save the world -- why are we putting that pressure on an esp32 board running a cool dialect of forth?