Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Miah Johnson

@ripienaar counter: libera.chat.

Just because efnet turned into a shitshow, and freenode sold out doesn't mean you can't run your own server. You _DON'T_ have to chat on a "big" network. You can run your own for friends and family.

"The stuff irc opers get up to" sure. Everything can be abused. Just throw your PC into the ocean already.

38 comments
DELETED

@miah @ripienaar “Just throw your PC into the ocean already.”

This sentiment I whole heartedly agree with.

R.I.Pienaar

@miah Point is, you have valid points about IRC and I agree a lot - but the big missing “*" is if you are able to pick a good and well run and well intentioned server or network.

Much the same concerns as here etc.

FoolishOwl

@miah @ripienaar That's probably better. IRCv3 is pretty good, but the "big" networks never update their software and no one says anything in the channels. Better to run a private server for a few friends who actually use it.

R.I.Pienaar

@miah And largely also why many of the federated services fail or dont succeed in the wider sense - its impossible to know who to trust. Even a enormous comunity of some of the most paranoid crazies on the planet (us) didnt see the Freenode thing coming

Miah Johnson

@ripienaar I wonder what would have happened had Lilo not passed away. Maybe Freenode would have been different? Maybe worse? Who knows. I don't know why the past leadership sold it off. I'm totally baffled by that whole situation.

R.I.Pienaar

@miah And indeed, I can also run my own Mastadon server - but even I dont do that I pay someone to do it.

It's just not a viable answer for someone who uses Slack day to day.

Until we find ways to deal with these super hard to solve problems, these suggestions are largely not useful. Many of us have tried corporate IRC servers and lol, how bad does that go.

Miah Johnson

@ripienaar We ran our own IRC & ZNC servers at Bank Simple for years. We of course switched to Slack after we got bought because... probably because management wanted to read the private messages of an employee.

R.I.Pienaar

@miah Did all your business users in the company, CEO and all other executives and sales etc, use IRC?

Miah Johnson

@ripienaar Yes, everybody was on irc. We all chatted regularly. The shift happened more than a year after we got bought out.

Similarly everybody was on our github enterprise. I could tag _anybody_ in the company, and we all had access to repos. It wasn't uncommon for somebody from a different department to send in a PR to fix something that was bothering them. I patched some text on our web app while I worked in ops (weird gendering of things that didnt need it).

R.I.Pienaar

@miah Thats pretty amazing, literally first case I ever hear of achieving that

Miah Johnson

@ripienaar For a time Bank Simple was amazing, one of the best jobs of my career... up until our buyout =) We tried to keep things great then, and in many ways we got better, but in so many others we got much much worse.

SnoopJ replied to Miah

@miah had no idea you'd worked for them, but yea, oof, I bet.

Thanks for helping provide an actually-good banking experience while it lasted! 💙

Ben Carlsson replied to Miah

@miah @ripienaar My heart goes out to y’all, I was a customer for years up until the bitter end. It was always clear the love and care that went into the product.

Matthew Abbott

@miah @ripienaar I *really* wanted to have our whole 50-60 head company on our Gitlab enterprice license since we were trying to get more people engaged in the PO meetings. Unfortunately pricing just wouldn't work out.

Enterprise productivity tools like that need a "guest pass" seat tier or something so we can at least get our whole directory taggable from the discussion tools or something.

Serenus

@ripienaar I don’t see why they couldn’t? There are significantly more arcane systems (e.g. SAP) in common use.

R.I.Pienaar

@Serenus The problem usually came in quality of the client apps. Find a good business orientated IRC client, maybe they exist now I hadnt checked in a minute - but they didnt then.

And by business orientated I mean that includes the needs of compliance etc. @miah

Miah Johnson

@ripienaar @Serenus I think most people in "tech" ran a simple command line irc client, while everybody else ran the Mac Colloquy.

We had a standard of "no Windows" on the server network, and after buyout our new "compliance" broke that rule, ripped out our slapd and replaced it with Active Directory.

DELETED

@miah Simple was the only bank I ever actually liked. It was an awesome thing to have built. Cool to hear it was on IRC too. I hate Discord and all the closed silos of information.

ᴚ uɐᗡ

@miah @ripienaar mattermost you can also host as a slack alternative

or matrix, if you want to do the activity pub thing.. and federate, and have e2e

both have pretty slick free mobile clients

F4GRX Sébastien

@ripienaar @miah ircd is just one apt install away. That is MUCH easier and lighter than mastodon.

benjamin melançon

@ripienaar @miah

Zulip is so much better than Slack (topics not threads! so much better— and i am someone who cannot choose an e-mail subject to save my life), also better than IRC. Zulip is what we moved to.

Free software that you *can* self-host but also available as a service.

I think for many it will hit that sweet spot between convenience and freedom/control.

zulip.com/

benjamin melançon

Though i don't want to derail the main thread too much, which is that IRC is alive and well.

`irc.indymedia.org` is where @mayfirst and some other groups we are part of are on, everything else is on `libera.chat` i think.

Björn

@mlncn anything that involves threads does sound like it should be an e-mail.
It does sound like we reinvent email for a lot of things for those that don't "like" e-mail.

Chris Were ⁂🐧🌱☕

@thaodan I you're spot on there. I'm a very happy email user at posteo.de.

Urzl

@thaodan @mlncn People don't know how to triage email. They try to read absolutely everything, get overwhelmed and then stop reading anything at all.

If I get a hundred emails in a day, 80 of them came from a noisy automation reporting status changes and 15 came from some form of corporate chatter. I only *need* to read those last 5.

Those 80 automated emails aren't too much because a) I ignore them and b) I don't immediately delete them so I can still go back for it later as needed.

Björn

@gooba42 @mlncn I think the issue is that most users don't know how to use filters AND that people subscribe to services that just dump everything into their mailboxes by default.

benjamin melançon

@thaodan @gooba42

Yeah there's definitely a lot of benefit to IRC/Slack/whathaveyou that has nothing to do with features compared to e-mail and more to do with "this bucket of things i care about is HERE". But also:

- Zulip lets you move messages between topics, not so possible in e-mail
- someone can join a channel or topic later, in e-mail they'd have to be forwarded the thread
- e-mail takes more attention and discipline to quote only relevant parts, and customs differ by 5+ people.

Björn replied to benjamin

@mlncn @gooba42 Mixing chats with long-form isn't a good idea IMHO.
There should be chat and then if there's long form conversation that looks and acts like a letter there's email or any form
that you think is more modern.

I don't think the medium email has anything to do with keeping etiquette or posting styles. You can always quote more than needed.

Björn replied to Björn

@gooba42 @mlncn
The thing is that Email is standartized, anyone can join a conversation without installing a client that can talk the proprietary protocol of this Zulip.
Also no way to replace an Email client with a webapp.

allo

@ripienaar
But the migration to libera went smoothly. Because changing to a new server means mostly changing the server address in your client and registering your channels and nick on the new server. That's it, no further migration steps needed. Connecting to multiple servers is also common and no problem. Especially since IRC is so open for joining new channels without invites and so on, there is little lock-in.

@miah

Ben Zanin

@miah @ripienaar in fact I'd say that the Freenode/Libera story is an enormous argument *for* IRC: some shitheel took over the domain name for a beloved network? The operators who still have the trust of the community can set up new underpinnings in hours and support 30,000+ active users switching over in days, and still spend so little on infra costs¹ that even a donations-only income is enough to support paying moderators.

That resiliency is impossible... except.

¹: libera.chat/annual-reports/

@miah @ripienaar in fact I'd say that the Freenode/Libera story is an enormous argument *for* IRC: some shitheel took over the domain name for a beloved network? The operators who still have the trust of the community can set up new underpinnings in hours and support 30,000+ active users switching over in days, and still spend so little on infra costs¹ that even a donations-only income is enough to support paying moderators.

Billy Smith

@gnomon @miah @ripienaar

This is what happened with the London Hackspace IRC channels.

One of the moderators set up another parallel service, and the transition took place easily. :D

Open Protocols for the Win! :D

Björn

@gnomon exactly.
For example because Discord works so good right now for many doesn't mean they can't just lock the whole thing don't and squeeze the money out of it's user's.

SnoopJ

@miah @ripienaar yea if anything Freenode is actually a vote of confidence in IRC I think? Yes it sucked a lot that some predator freakshow tried to pull a coup, but the organizational/financial cost of just routing around him was low enough that this could just happen. A kind of fault tolerance that is exceedingly rare in communication media

Go Up