|
Top-level
We vote for the algorithm with our feet. We use co pilot or chatGPT because its useful, really powerful tools, they improve our life, speed of work or learning. We will use also more powerful ai if they improve our life. EDIT: The people wont felt forced. The will search for the benefits of the ai decisions. 12 comments
@ForeverExpat @balkongast @Gargron So, the human is the problem not the ai? :> @helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron If you see it this way, humans are not necessary at all. @helles_sachsen @balkongast @Gargron @ForeverExpat @balkongast @Gargron I for one everyone think we are so shiitty with this that it's very likely everyone and everything is better than us. Often throwing a coin would be better then human decisions. @helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron Coding this way seems to fit perfectly to any requirement? @balkongast @ForeverExpat @Gargron These algorithm today that come out to be racists for example where made from humans. I mistrust humans more than a machine and throwing a coin. @helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron Hold my beer ... didn't you say that it would be too expensive to train such an AI? @balkongast @ForeverExpat @Gargron For governments for sure, but not for Google. But Google got a shitstorm for a racist KI. They have to produce ai that they can sell. @helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron From a certain point of view, the humans are a problem. See: @helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron As long as you restrict that to code, fine with me. |
Gregory's Server
@helles_sachsen @balkongast @Gargron
“Voting with your feet” …and the people prioritize local and/or short term over global and long term and thereby inject sub-optimal, inconsistent human ethical decision-making into the equation…and thus override the ability for the Kantian algorithms to maximize well being and human flourishing and fail to take into account cascading, long term effects.