Gregory's Server@ForeverExpat @balkongast @Gargron So, the human is the problem not the ai? :>
|
9 comments
@helles_sachsen @balkongast @Gargron @ForeverExpat @balkongast @Gargron I for one everyone think we are so shiitty with this that it's very likely everyone and everything is better than us. Often throwing a coin would be better then human decisions. @helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron Coding this way seems to fit perfectly to any requirement? @balkongast @ForeverExpat @Gargron These algorithm today that come out to be racists for example where made from humans. I mistrust humans more than a machine and throwing a coin. @helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron Hold my beer ... didn't you say that it would be too expensive to train such an AI? @balkongast @ForeverExpat @Gargron For governments for sure, but not for Google. But Google got a shitstorm for a racist KI. They have to produce ai that they can sell. @helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron From a certain point of view, the humans are a problem. See: |
@helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron
If you see it this way, humans are not necessary at all.
What consequences that implies is not what I would accept.
I guess your restrictions to the areas where you actually use AI is simply restricting the way to look at AI.