@helles_sachsen @balkongast @Gargron
I’m saying algos acting in a pure Kantian way [insert any philosophical framework] are bound to conflict with human (mis)perceptions of ethical outcomes. Problem is that humans often refuse to give up personal well-being/agency to benefit the many. How does an algo weigh the diversity of definitions of human flourishing in a complex adaptive system? Kant doesn’t scale. Humans a shit at this. No reason to expect AI will be better. Unless you just give into AI