|
Top-level
 "The arguments must correspond properly (after type promotion) with the conversion specifier. By default, the arguments are used in the order given, where each '*' (see Field width and Precision below) and each conversion specifier asks for the next argument (and it is an error if insufficiently many arguments are given)." Uh... ok... look maybe we're getting off track here, that first error message said "character constant too long for its type", let's look for that. 34 comments
Let's try something different, maybe gcc --help will do something. And holy shit does it ever.  @mhoye I am currently working on a short tutorial about date-time manipulation in SQLite. I just reached the part where I explain what Julian days are. Well, let's see if we can find the error we got in that first message somewhere in the help file, the "-Wmultichar" thing we got in that first warning message. Let's see.... nope? "apropos multichar" comes up empty too, assuming I know about it. Tell me what I should have done differently. This is a _typo in 'hello world'_. What trail of breadcrumbs should I have followed that would have gotten me from "incompatible integer to pointer conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'const char *'" to "You want double-quotes, not single quotes there", using the error messages and docs? You complain about "StacktGPT Developers?" Well, this is what people are up against. @mhoye I think this is an excellent walkthrough of an all-too-common situation. Thanks for taking the time to make it. @mhoye The number of responses in the thread treating this as purely a documentation problem is also really alarming, tbh. There are human factors issues at multiple stages of this! The earliest one is probably the design of C, where the difference between values occupying types with wildly different semantics is expressed via the shift key alone, for example. @mhoye This 100%!! My god I can't believe how many times I've looked with despair at convoluted docs when a series of explained, code examples would have gone 1000x better. That's why people love StackOverflow, because the answers usually include *example code*. It's the programming equivalent of 'a picture is worth a thousand words'. Show me don't tell me.  I often suspect if the ultimate โzenโ of documentation is just a well structured and indexed series of code examples with outputs and inputs. Similarly for research papers except with figures and plots. @syntaxseed @mhoye @gvwilson after a few decades watching and doing software development and maintenance I have these recurring thoughts: - I wish I had been taught the basics of technical writing at university. @graydon yeah. Weโll get to the point where this is understood as a load-bearing archaeology exercise, I think, that yes thereโs lead in the pipes and asbestos in the walls and you donโt even wanna know how big those roaches are, but _some_ of these pipes still bring people drinkable water and heating, and here are the skills and tools you need to work safely in this environment, but weโre not building anything new like this ever, whatever those weird PDP-11 Reenactment Society people say.  @mhoye What's interesting is that all of those would've worked in #Elisp without ever leaving #Emacs. Much of it with #CommonLisp and #SLIME too. Most of the implementations also come with #info #manuals and their source-code (for those things not mentioned in the manual), and hyperspec.el also handles searching through the #HyperSpec locally on one's machine (it's packaged on Debian) and provides keybinds to search symbols automatically right from your editor. C lacks most of this. @mhoye #Interlisp did it better than most modern #CommonLisp environments though, if what I recall hearing is correct, as the documentation didn't require additional setup (pointing the editor at the docs' location). @mhoye@mastodon.social this is one of the reasons i generally stray away from things written in C(++) and why to some "not written in C" is seen as a selling point  Almost all projects/products have two mutually exclusive problems at the same time; "Too Much Information" and "Too Little Information", depending on WHO you ask and WHEN you ask. I think the "real" problem is much more about psychology and personal character. Why would software require less "practice" to reach "proficiency" than for instance becoming a doctor, a lawyer, a musician,...? I would argue that no matter what docs you have, it can't replace experience/practice. But maybe I am missing your whole point... If this was only about C/C++ not understanding what are warnings and what are errors, then perhaps you should chose to work with a different language. Most of the weird errors in C are due to legacy code, and you could (I do) set compiler switches to treat all warnings to errors. Every single one of us has probably made a joke about searching recipe blogs for basic information, and finding "Here's how you make boiled eggs. It's easy and fun! I was in an alley in the outskirts of Algiers in 1987 the first time I watched a man die. I can still remember the blistering sun, the smell. Since then" for like forty pages of meaningful story and protein chemistry, all while you are in front of a pot of boiling water with an egg and your question is "how long do I boil an egg". That is most of the tech documentation experience. Precisely like that, but with the detailed spec and the interface details instead of the dead man in an Algerian alleyway and the protein chemistry. I understand that might seem like a big difference but the experience is the same. @mhoye and in the end, it turns out the story actually took place in Tangier...  @mhoye also please note that this is the wrong printf manual, this is the manpage for the printf command-line tool not for the C function. if anything that strengthens your point, heh  @mhoye no no you're supposed to know gcc and a few other highly doctrinaire programs have a totally different help system called "info" that no one remembers to use.  @mhoye I'm not a fan of GCC's manual for a number of reasons, but it's infuriating how many distros feel like it's necessary to split out the documentation from it. Just package it as gcc-full (aliased to gcc) by default and if someone *absolutely* wants it without documentation then they can install gcc-bin or whatever. @mhoye you complain there's no docs and you stop reading the docs where there are examples using double quotes. Plus your issue is you're not specifying a string literal correctly. This is covered in the very concise K&R C book written over four decades ago. Every language has rules about literals. You do need to learn a language to use it... |
Gregory's Server
Welp.