Sometimes I reflect on what a true miracle it is that Mozilla produced several useful and important products despite heroic efforts by their management to prevent that outcome
Top-level
Sometimes I reflect on what a true miracle it is that Mozilla produced several useful and important products despite heroic efforts by their management to prevent that outcome 67 comments
@linuxfiend @jalefkowit I'll never forget my discovery of Phoenix. I felt like I was on the forefront of internet tech. Such a great time! I did not know about the connection to Netscape. No wonder it had similar vibes to it. @allenstenhaus @linuxfiend Side note: Joel Spolsky, one of the founders of Stack Overflow, got his first real pop of public attention in 2000 by writing a blog post predicting the Netscape rewrite would be a disaster. It still gets circulated as a classic example of a highly influential post. https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/04/06/things-you-should-never-do-part-i/ @jalefkowit @allenstenhaus @linuxfiend sweet jeebus i remember reading that (joel re: rewriting from scratch) like it was yesterday. 23 yrs ago! Im so old NB: If you ever wondered where Thunderbird came from, it came from Firefox blowing up the Mozilla Suite. The email client component of the Suite was never anywhere near as popular as the browser component, but it at least had a healthy base of active users, which was more than anyone could say for the other parts of the Suite. So when the Suite exploded, the email client was salvaged from the debris, given its own installer, and turned into a standalone product called Thunderbird. @mcc I’m not sure. They said something in 2017 about planning to excise XUL (which, yes, 💯). But I can’t find a release since then with a formal declaration that the work has been done. (I’m not an active SeaMonkey user myself, so all I know is what I read on their web site.) @jalefkowit @mcc I do still kinda have some nostalgia for Composer. The whole "suite" idea gets a bit of a bad rap, I think; MS Office (and, heck, iWork) is a "suite" and nobody has problems with that, because it still presents the elementts of its suite as normal applications and not as a single fused block of functionality that is inexplicably built as its own launcher. @jalefkowit @mcc the problem with SeaMonkey was that the UI was terrible and the interaction design was terrible and the bloatedness of the "suite" idiom did make it a little worse, but it was much more a symptom of the disease than the cause @jalefkowit @mcc anyway I say this because while firefox was unambiguously vastly better, the abandonment of composer as part of the functionality of a browser was symbolic of a move from a world where we wanted everyone to be able to take control of HTML editing and website design, to a world where users used browsers and serious web developers used development tools and there was no overlap between these populations. once again, symptom not a cause, but it would have been nice if they'd tried @mcc @jalefkowit wow, there's a name i haven't heard in a very, very long time. i submitted patches for chatzilla long ago @jalefkowit Oh wow, They even still have Chatzilla. Perhaps one day somebody will use it. @jalefkowit SeaMonkey is absolutely stellar, and I guess I prefer it since I grew up on the internet within AOL, so an all-in-one internet suite feels comfy, but the older LTS base means many "secure" sites throw errors and don't let me use them when I'm in SeaMonkey. @jalefkowit it's still my daily driver. I still build it myself, leftover habit from when I was actively contributing to it. The split to firefox never made any sense to me. I can't see using an email client without an integrated HTML renderer. Or without an integrated calendar. I did a bunch of work to improve the MailNews codebase, accelerate their build system, and keep Calendar working in the suite. http://highlandsun.com/hyc/#mozilla_hacking @jalefkowit i liked the suite! i went from netscape communicator to the mozilla suite to seamonkey and didn't switch to the firefox/thunderbird combo until like 2010 after it became clear that the seamonkey browser wasn't keeping pace. @jalefkowit I am loving your explainers of the browser wars, how Firefox came about, etc. I remember it all too. Hilarious. It really was the wild west. Especially while a lot of those people involved are still alive. It may not be so in 5 or 10 years. @jalefkowit thanks for the trip down memory lane. Here's a side fork in the path (one of many) that's interesting: https://www.jwz.org/doc/about-jwz.html @jalefkowit and a long treatment on how the Mozilla name and mascot came to exist in the first place: https://www.jwz.org/blog/2016/10/they-live-and-the-secret-history-of-the-mozilla-logo/ Huh, reading this again, after your thread, I'm even more struck by how apropos "They Live" as a background theme is. @jalefkowit I always thought there was something wonderfully egalitarian about a browser that shipped the tools to build the pages it was designed to view. I think that's a thing we could use a lot more of. I remember those early Mozilla alpha/beta releases, they were pretty rough, but I used them anyway. And Netscape 3/4 before that. @jalefkowit as far as I know SeaMonkey is the only branch that kept plugging away at the idea that a 'web browser' could and should also be a 'web editor'. It's a great loss that we don't have any mainstream web editors today. @jalefkowit I think they tried to spin off the chat client, too, but it ultimately became just a plug-in for Firefox and ultimately died. @tewha@appdot.net #ChatZilla still lives on in the #SeaMonkey project; it's #IRCv3 compatible now actually thanks to a #UXP (the forked #Mozilla 52 ESR codebase #PaleMoon uses) fork of CZ called #Ambassador spearheading the initial effort of modernizing the #IRC #chat client. https://github.com/Ascrod/ambassador/ I kind of missed all that. I actually used iCab for years. Many years. It's still going, I should check it out. @jalefkowit and Blake was an 18 year old intern at the time if my memory serves me right. @jalefkowit Ever since they partnered with google they just lost the breaks it seems, once I read an article they wrote on where they basically say that we need more deplatforming, ever since I don't trust anything that comes out of them, which is a shame as there are so many tallented developers there, but what can I do. Article cited: https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2021/01/08/we-need-more-than-deplatforming/ @BoredomFestival @jalefkowit On some level they are, at least in my view, as an open source friendly company, they should not be involved in actively censoring the web for any political view because of their opinions, I absolutely despise what those rioters did and think most if not all of them should be in jail, but censorship is never the answer. @jalefkowit@octodon.social sorry don't you mean Firefox? @jalefkowit @Andres Sorry to hear that. If it helps, this is kind of the Classic Tech Problem. Everybody suffers through it sometime. I know I have 😀 @jalefkowit @jalefkowit Honestly it sometimes feels like google is the real spirtual successor to this. And I don't mean the obviously evil, cartoonishly bad things they are doing, I mean the google graveyard, where anything that seems like if they let it mature and be nice and stay supported it might oh wait it's dead. |
@jalefkowit rip firefoxOS