@cjrando I don't mind that, but what I do mind is them deleting articles.
Top-level
@cjrando I don't mind that, but what I do mind is them deleting articles. 4 comments
@StampedingLonghorn @cjrando I don't mean to "but actually", though it is worth noting that the WMF and its governance is totally different from things like deletions which are community-run. There are definitely issues with how notability and such is applied, for sure, but that's unrelated to the giant pot or gold. |
@StampedingLonghorn @cjrando
They deleted the list of electroacoustic composers of colour -a metadata list- because it wasn't 'noteworthy'. After demanding I dig up a bunch of research showing it was needed, which they then declared to be "original research" and therefore unsuitable. They took up every spare second I had for several days in a row, then trashed my contribution the moment they had a majority.
The discussion was like a like a check list for white supremacy culture.
(Anyway, other very noteworthy lists they keep are "people born in 1971" who are obviously all musically tied to each other in the way they demanded I prove.)
@StampedingLonghorn @cjrando
They deleted the list of electroacoustic composers of colour -a metadata list- because it wasn't 'noteworthy'. After demanding I dig up a bunch of research showing it was needed, which they then declared to be "original research" and therefore unsuitable. They took up every spare second I had for several days in a row, then trashed my contribution the moment they had a majority.