|
Top-level
@kevinrns @jgilbert It’s worth pointing out the Supreme Court has created a 3rd party exception to the 4th amendment. If you give information to a 3rd party - be it a bank, a teleco, Facebook, or an app that tracks cycles - a warrant isn’t required to search that information, at least as far as the US Constitution is concerned. 6 comments
 Ediiting out nonsense. 1. It agrees completely with my point that your ASUMED PRIVACY in front a toy a tech Bro sold IS GONE. Nothing you say in front of Alexa or your phone is safe, ypur privacy will be stolen, you WILL be sold out to republican courts. Your daughter is being watched by creeps in glass towers, her words transcribed, her freedom threatened, by her phone. Some GOP loons are talking about abortion murder charges @kevinrns The only point is that there’s no constitutional protection. People tend to think of their phone as their private sphere, but data transmitted to tech bros doesn’t enjoy an expectation of privacy from the Court. (Unless it’s encrypted from your device and the tech co has no back door.) Yes thanks. I am concerned that, like tixtter users thinking they are still on social media, and not being used to hide a weapon, device users DO NOT KNOW they are having their privacy stolen by their devices. It can be, and has, been used to arrest women talking about healthcare in their own home alone. Maybe a cardboard police officer needs to put on display with just this message across the chest, for dorms? Places were privacy might be appreciated. The ACLU might help. Hmmm maybe there is needed a 1st and 4th ammendment version of smart devices. Ha. That would change tech. A mandated requirement to protect information |
Gregory's Server
@kevinrns @jgilbert
https://www.law.georgetown.edu/american-criminal-law-review/aclr-online/volume-56/alexa-can-you-keep-a-secret-the-third-party-doctrine-in-the-age-of-the-smart-home/