Gregory's Server@kevinrns The only point is that there’s no constitutional protection. People tend to think of their phone as their private sphere, but data transmitted to tech bros doesn’t enjoy an expectation of privacy from the Court. (Unless it’s encrypted from your device and the tech co has no back door.)
|
2 comments
 Hmmm maybe there is needed a 1st and 4th ammendment version of smart devices. Ha. That would change tech. A mandated requirement to protect information |
@jonpainterphoto
Yes thanks. I am concerned that, like tixtter users thinking they are still on social media, and not being used to hide a weapon, device users DO NOT KNOW they are having their privacy stolen by their devices. It can be, and has, been used to arrest women talking about healthcare in their own home alone.
Maybe a cardboard police officer needs to put on display with just this message across the chest, for dorms? Places were privacy might be appreciated. The ACLU might help.