Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
:pdx_elk:

Just a heads up, if you have a following on social media and are thinking about posting about that pink movie or others, SAG-AFTRA states:

"Influencers should refrain from posting on social media about any struck work regardless of whether they are posting organically or in a paid capacity."

You may not consider yourself an influencer, but maybe consider the spirit of their request.

#SAGAFTRA #WGA #Strike

18 comments
Tical91

@rose For more information please have a look from people who actually work in the industry.

youtu.be/0rSHAhXJ0ZQ

hybrid havoc

@rose
sagaftrastrike.org/influencer- is the link

Note that these are guidelines to union influencers or those that may wish to join the union in the future.

I do not think this is a request to people with a social following in general. But anyone can read over the FAQ and decide for themselves.

:pdx_elk:

@hybridhavoc that's all I was saying. I might not be an influencer or likely to join SAGAFTRA, but I am a union member and have a small following on here. So, I felt it reasonable to honor that request, and thought others might want to as well.

hybrid havoc

@rose
For sure. A link to the source of the quote just provides more context.

pettybooshwah

@rose @BlackAzizAnansi Nice! Also, knock it off with the spoilers. Jerks.

Gemini6Ice

@rose I’m confused about the meaning of “struck work” (and my websearching isn’t helping?). I thought it meant “job functions whose performers are in strike,” but this toot sounds like you’re saying that-movie is “struck work”?

:pdx_elk:

@gemini6ice actors continue to work after a movie is done to promote the movie. They are also striking from that work.

Gemini6Ice

@rose ahhh thank you. I thought you were saying the movie was black listed by the strikers somehow and we shouldn’t see it or talk about, but you’re just talking about the promoting stuff for strikers

ShinyBlueThing

@gemini6ice @rose new releases from entities that are being picketed count as struck work, even if the releases were made prior to the strike.

Samuel Johnson

@rose for those of us who aren't as familiar with the terminology, is paying to view a "struck work" considered crossing a picket line? Or is the limitation on supporting it via buzz/influence/etc.?

:pdx_elk:

@SamUpstate it depends. the union isn't calling on people to boycott movies at this time as far as I'm aware.

Movie promotion is usually paid work that actors do as a movie is released though, and I believe these guidelines are to make sure that social media influencers don't scab on that struck work.

Personally, I'm not even saying "don't post about them". I'm just suggesting we reflect on if we are doing that promotional work in place of the actors, and consider how we frame our online posting about them with that in mind.

@SamUpstate it depends. the union isn't calling on people to boycott movies at this time as far as I'm aware.

Movie promotion is usually paid work that actors do as a movie is released though, and I believe these guidelines are to make sure that social media influencers don't scab on that struck work.

LukefromDC

@rose As a rule I would not want to post anyone that would induce someone to go to the theater, buy a DVD, use a subscription movie service, or wach a monetized youtube video of content covered by the strike and de facto boycott.

A "this movie sucks, wish I hadn't wasted my money" review is another matter of course

LukefromDC

@SamUpstate @rose A union can face legal hassles with a boycott call, but we who are not members of the union are immune.

Do not do anything that sends money to the film bosses. If you want to watch a movie, torrent it instead so they get nothing.

Samuel Johnson

@LukefromDC @rose well, I haven't actually seen a movie in theaters in more than a decade, so that's not a big ask for me. But I also won't illegally torrent a movie. That won't help the situation. I'd rather send the $20 I would have spent at the cinema to the WGA and read a book for a few hours instead. Or spend a few hours talking about the value of unions.

LukefromDC

@SamUpstate @rose I have exactly zero respect for the movie and music publishing industries after the filesharing lawsuits. I fully endorse the behavior of the tens of millions of people who sank the RIAA lawsuits by never buying another CD. No copyright law could force those who had landlines and traceable IP addresses to consume any content.

I cannot be found without help from at least the cops if not the FBI due to no landline, no contract phones, no credit cards for phone service (cash only) and never sharing my name with anyone's customer service. On the other hand, I do not have the bandwidth for long form video in general. My half hour long year end videos in 960x540p are about the limit. Archive.org has trouble streaming anything larger in resolution and I refuse to use ad supported video hosting sites for my published work. I would sooner host it myself than allow ads.

Yes, I shoot video and even release some very complex videos, notably my annual "year in activism" videos that can have hundreds of clips, as many captions, and some complex editing for special effects. On the one that comes out end of this year, I had only a still of torched police motorcycles in Atlanta for the Weelaunee Forest Defenders's July 1 attack on the current police academy there. I composited that with flames from my mother's old fireplace to reconstruct the image of burning police motorcycles and have video rather than a still. The only actors in news video are the politicians of course.

I operate on a "zero subscription/zero ads" model, and to the extent possible boycott monetized content and sites. A strike like this can turn it from a soft "avoid" to a hard boycott. I don't want my money crossing picket lines.

@SamUpstate @rose I have exactly zero respect for the movie and music publishing industries after the filesharing lawsuits. I fully endorse the behavior of the tens of millions of people who sank the RIAA lawsuits by never buying another CD. No copyright law could force those who had landlines and traceable IP addresses to consume any content.

Go Up