@davidrevoy #NoAI

@davidrevoy honestly imo it's the ai art that should be othered out, not hand made art

@davidrevoy it's the others that should mark their art.

@davidrevoy I don't think there is a need. AI one is tagged, which is enough, IMO.

@davidrevoy I'd say Hi, because
1. Human Imagination
2. Human Intelligence
3. it's always nice says Hi ! :)

@davidrevoy In my opinion everything from the AI ​​should rather contain #AiArt. And the other way around, you shouldn't have to worry as much.

@davidrevoy #TuringTestCompliantArt

@davidrevoy #RealArt

@davidrevoy #artbyhumans ?

@davidrevoy I recommend NOT tagging it in any machine-recognizable way. As the Internet gets flooded by AI-generated content, funding material that can be used to train models becomes more and more difficult. Tagging it in an easily recognizable way makes it easier to be found and fed into the next generation models.
I put a more detailed argument about this here
http://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/not-by-ai/
although I think the machine is down ATM 8-/

@davidrevoy #ActualArt #NoAI #FuckAI

@davidrevoy

I would insist on ditching out AI art into a specific category rather than making people put their hand-made/manual works in their own category. When something is done by machine learning, there is always a chance of copyright infringement, so posters of such things really need to make it clear that some work of unknown origin may be transformed by an AI. So, I suggest the opposite of manual hashtag: #AIArt should do it.

@davidrevoy I think that this might be counterproductive, as it might create an easy-to-mine hashtag for AIs to be trained upon.

Nothing. You shouldn't mark your art to show that it was made by a human. AI generated pieces should be marked as well. When I say piece, I mean everything. Not just visual or audible art pieces but also videos, emails, essays, articles, etc. Anything and everything generated by AI should be labelled clearly.

@davidrevoy

@davidrevoy None. The onus is on the ones that use AI to disclose it.

@davidrevoy #HiArt Human Intelligence Art or #NiArt Natural Intelligence Art

@davidrevoy "Art"

@davidrevoy

Maybe #AI "art" should be marked as #ArtForgery ? 😏

@davidrevoy

#NoBot

No just for art but anything not using AI...?

@davidrevoy all of the above and maybe #noai

@davidrevoy

@davidrevoy "The creator of this work has been able to solve a captcha"

@davidrevoy ZERO-AI or 0-AI simple and effective

@davidrevoy A little bit long: #NotMadeWithAI
#MadeWithoutAI

shorter:
#NotAIArt
#RealArtist

politically incorrect:
#SuckAI
#NoFuckingAI
#DontTalkMeAboutShittyAI
#DidYourMotherNeededAnAIToBePregnantWithYou
#NotAnAICounterfeit
#ThinkWithYourBrainNotWithAnAI

@davidrevoy #LudditeArtist
AI is just the latest tool with which to create art. It takes a lot of time and effort to get good results.

And to create art for sale, it must be responsibly sourced, compensating any artists on whose work it is based.

@davidrevoy At first AI "art" got me impressed, but then it felt like tons and tons of "sameness", I still prefer the variety and personality of human art.

@davidrevoy I don't think it needs a special tag for it.

@davidrevoy Why not just HandMade? It is not like AI has hands! (for now)

@davidrevoy Real artists shouldn't have to hashtag anything. AI generated art should be tagged however.

@davidrevoy Both are good, though I think I’ll start adding #NoAI to things I make just to drive the point home.

@davidrevoy
#madeByMe #myArtwork #artWithSoul

@davidrevoy
Not sure if I need such distinction.
But if not using isn't an option, then the #HumanArt because it uses the same convention as #AIArt which is already in use.

@davidrevoy say what the medium is, like #painting or #drawing

@davidrevoy It should evoke positive emotions. "HumanArt" sounds like something a robot or alien would say.

I would vote for #RealArt

@davidrevoy How about #OrganicArt

@davidrevoy #soulmade

@davidrevoy most cameras today , especially phones, apply software enhancement, is that AI?

@davidrevoy

Humain art, car ça ressemble a la chanson de Lara fabian

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8wD3o8LQNr8

@davidrevoy "Made by Natural Intelligence" :)

@davidrevoy #MammalianMade or #MadeInMammals

@davidrevoy #PassionateArt

@davidrevoy @ellane Maybe just I. Intelligence.

@davidrevoy It shouldn’t have one 😞

@davidrevoy "Retro"

@davidrevoy I think something like #handmade, which is used for crafts and such, would fit best. I reckon #HandmadeArt would be a good tag. I just feel #HumanMade is a bit too... wide and undefined. Every building is Human-made. And #HumanArt kind of feels.. off for me. I can't define it, it just doesn't sound right!

#HandmadeArt *possibly* cuts into painter territory? But it's not like digital artists don't use their hands to make their art, so I think it's fine ^^

@davidrevoy HumanArt sounds a lot like art of a human, so I feel like HumanMade is more clear

@davidrevoy #madeWithARealBeatingHeart

@davidrevoy obviously, as a notorious horse and maker of things that aren't intentionally art, I'm going to have to go with #ConsciouslyMade or similar.

But about whether it's a good idea to provide a tag for unscrupulous ML trainers to feed on, I'm less sure. See thread!

@davidrevoy
I agree with all other comments about not labeling because it could be targeted by IA.

I like "handmade art" more than "human made" if I had to choose.

@davidrevoy the AI artist should be the one to add a hashtag. Though I realize this is a though demand.

@davidrevoy None. Art is in the eye of the recipient, not determined by the creator.

@davidrevoy human made should be the default. If I don't see a hashtag or something indicating it is AI art I should be safe to assume it is human made.

@davidrevoy How about #HumanMadeWithoutAI or just #MadeWithoutAI? I feel it needs to be more specific than #HumanMade since that is a fine line of did a human make it and use AI or not.

@davidrevoy All art is "human art," even the art made by AI. "Human made," is more descriptive of what we are talking about, I think, when said in English. When I see the words, "human made" I feel it is describing the process of making the art, and not who made it. It is also a nice counterpoint to the tag "AI generated."

@davidrevoy
I agree with others that the onus is on AI generated content to self-label.

I can't resist the chance to give something a name though. Therefore:

#OrganicIntelligence
#BioIntelligence

@davidrevoy @lisamelton I like what the guy who first got me into the creative industries said: he uses AE…Actual Experience.

@davidrevoy @lisamelton Also, if you use “human” to differentiate, then it becomes the “other” and puts non-human as the default idea in our monkey brains.

@davidrevoy I like NoAI I think

@davidrevoy #NoAI #HumanCreativity

@davidrevoy original

@davidrevoy
#SarahConnorSentMe

@davidrevoy #art

@davidrevoy

hand crafted

@davidrevoy Voted for #HumanMade as something that cover also something that normally not considered formally as #art but still have piece of human creativity and drop of alive author's soul within.

@davidrevoy

I don't know exactly what it should be, but it needs to be more insulting towards AI 'art'.

#AuthenticArt perhaps?

@davidrevoy #MadeInHuman™️

@davidrevoy @lisamelton how about #NotShit ?

@davidrevoy the Intention is always from the artist

@davidrevoy #crafted instead of #generated.

@davidrevoy #MadeByHuman or in latin #FactaAbHominibus

@davidrevoy #NotAI

@davidrevoy
HumanArt in my case sounds more like the opposite of FurryArt. HumanMade reminds me of things like human made climate change or human made garbage patch. NoAI still seems the best for me, also safes on characters for posts.

@davidrevoy How about "#original"? It conveys that generative AI are not creating anything new. The issue with HumanMade is that AI are human made too, and transitively, their creations are human made too.

@davidrevoy #HumanArt sounds more like it would be art depicting humans. Like portraits and so on I guess...

@davidrevoy #humancreativity #notstolenart #realart

@davidrevoy

En français on dit Intelligence Artificielle (AI, quoi) donc j'imagine que le hashtag devrait être du genre "IA ! IA ! Shub-Niggurath !"...

@davidrevoy sweat, tears, and blood made.

@davidrevoy boutique

@davidrevoy
#NoAI seems popular

@davidrevoy Personally, I would go with #FuckAIArt but TBH either poll option works fine

@davidrevoy @clacke Can we please just use another word than art for things created by non-creatures?

@davidrevoy

#MadeByHumans

@davidrevoy is't AI human made?, like one of the replay, i would say #FuckAIArt

@davidrevoy @lisamelton #davidmefecit

@davidrevoy if you want one tag, let’s do like roman artists #homoquidammefecit

@davidrevoy #CreatedWithNaturalIntelligence

@davidrevoy I think #HumanMade seems more precise, but also, all AI is human-made, not just the software and hardware, but even the data for training and the alignment during that training, all that is human-made. So, #NotAI could be more rigorous, but less human-relevant.
Is it important provided that the audience can't tell the difference between both cases?
...

@davidrevoy I think #HumanMade is better than #HumanArt . Perhaps #HumanCrafted is an option?

@davidrevoy I win!

@davidrevoy the trouble is, people use AI to make art so they will list themselves as "a human artist" supposedly working in the medium of AI. It would take a long time to explain to these people, in terms they could understand, why AI isn't a medium. It's just big buckets of plagiarism.