Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Jan Niklas Fingerle

@chpietsch
I, too, disagree with his decision. I do so without misrepresenting his reasoning.

@steve @Mastodon @Gargron

4 comments
Jan Niklas Fingerle

@chpietsch
(1) @Gargron explicitly advocates for decentralisation, and (2) he never says people are dumb (he rather points out a way he wants to educate and convince people, which would contradict the assumption of dumbness).

I don't agree with him. I believe, most people will stay with their first instance, no matter what. Such, I am missing him explaining, how he wants to "push" people to migrate. But that doesn't give me the right to misrepresent what he said.

@steve @Mastodon

@chpietsch
(1) @Gargron explicitly advocates for decentralisation, and (2) he never says people are dumb (he rather points out a way he wants to educate and convince people, which would contradict the assumption of dumbness).

I don't agree with him. I believe, most people will stay with their first instance, no matter what. Such, I am missing him explaining, how he wants to "push" people to migrate. But that doesn't give me the right to misrepresent what he said.

Jan Niklas Fingerle

@chpietsch
Other than what? The 0-hypothesis should be, that @Gargron believes the things he lays out in his blog post. He might be wrong (I believe he is), but nevertheless it explains his actions.

You seem to think that he's lying. If so, make it explicit and accept the burden of proof. If not, how do you reconcile your description with the contents of the blog post?

@steve @Mastodon

Go Up