@chpietsch (1) @Gargron explicitly advocates for decentralisation,...

@chpietsch
(1) @Gargron explicitly advocates for decentralisation, and (2) he never says people are dumb (he rather points out a way he wants to educate and convince people, which would contradict the assumption of dumbness).

I don't agree with him. I believe, most people will stay with their first instance, no matter what. Such, I am missing him explaining, how he wants to "push" people to migrate. But that doesn't give me the right to misrepresent what he said.

@steve @Mastodon

Like 1 May 2023 at 20:56 | Wall-to-wall | Open on social.saarland

2 comments

Christian Pietsch 🍑

@jnfingerle @Gargron @steve @Mastodon What other explanation could there be?

1 May 2023 at 21:18 | Open on digitalcourage.social

Jan Niklas Fingerle

@chpietsch
Other than what? The 0-hypothesis should be, that @Gargron believes the things he lays out in his blog post. He might be wrong (I believe he is), but nevertheless it explains his actions.

You seem to think that he's lying. If so, make it explicit and accept the burden of proof. If not, how do you reconcile your description with the contents of the blog post?

@steve @Mastodon

1 May 2023 at 22:50 | Open on social.saarland