@chpietsch
Other than what? The 0-hypothesis should be, that @Gargron believes the things he lays out in his blog post. He might be wrong (I believe he is), but nevertheless it explains his actions.
You seem to think that he's lying. If so, make it explicit and accept the burden of proof. If not, how do you reconcile your description with the contents of the blog post?
Gregory's Server
@chpietsch
Other than what? The 0-hypothesis should be, that @Gargron believes the things he lays out in his blog post. He might be wrong (I believe he is), but nevertheless it explains his actions.
You seem to think that he's lying. If so, make it explicit and accept the burden of proof. If not, how do you reconcile your description with the contents of the blog post?
@steve @Mastodon