Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
addie's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
Natanael ⚠️

@Torfinn @EposVox Everything you mentioned can be solved with git

23 Dec 2022 at 0:03 | Wall-to-wall | Open on mastodon.social
6 comments
Torfinn

@Natanael_L @EposVox for sure. Although I haven’t seen any open consensus protocols on git I’d love to. Not talking about difs here talking about automated trustless consensus validation you’d need to have sufficiently reliable peers in some unspecified quantity come to a quorum on the “peer review”

23 Dec 2022 at 1:06 | Open on infosec.exchange
Natanael ⚠️

@Torfinn @EposVox that's not something you can solve with computer protocols, that's something you solve with human protocols. The closest thing is web of trust. Even with this approach you still only need git + replicated signatures from each peer reviewer + curators.

23 Dec 2022 at 1:14 | Open on mastodon.social
Torfinn

@Natanael_L @EposVox you can’t solve for multiparty consensus with computer protocols 🤣 uh

23 Dec 2022 at 1:24 | Open on infosec.exchange
Natanael ⚠️

@Torfinn @EposVox what you described is a social problem, the part computers can help with is propagating information but they can't make decisions about human peer review processes. They can only present a summary of concensus

23 Dec 2022 at 1:27 | Open on mastodon.social
Torfinn replied to Natanael

@Natanael_L @EposVox I definitely am not implying that the protocols should come to a consensus about the research itself 😅

23 Dec 2022 at 1:42 | Open on infosec.exchange
minimoysmagician

@Natanael_L @Torfinn @EposVox You might be interested to hear about holochain.org/ (not a blockchain, to be clear, Holochain in itself has NO coin)
Straight from their homepage: 'Think BitTorrent + Git + Cryptographic Signatures'

Just spreading some information, if you have questions, I follow the project already quite some time

23 Apr 2023 at 7:48 | Open on tech.lgbt
Go Up