@Torfinn @EposVox that's not something you can solve...

@Torfinn @EposVox that's not something you can solve with computer protocols, that's something you solve with human protocols. The closest thing is web of trust. Even with this approach you still only need git + replicated signatures from each peer reviewer + curators.

Like 23 Dec 2022 at 1:14 | Wall-to-wall | Open on mastodon.social

4 comments

Torfinn

@Natanael_L @EposVox you can’t solve for multiparty consensus with computer protocols 🤣 uh

23 Dec 2022 at 1:24 | Open on infosec.exchange

Natanael ⚠️

@Torfinn @EposVox what you described is a social problem, the part computers can help with is propagating information but they can't make decisions about human peer review processes. They can only present a summary of concensus

23 Dec 2022 at 1:27 | Open on mastodon.social

Torfinn replied to Natanael

@Natanael_L @EposVox I definitely am not implying that the protocols should come to a consensus about the research itself 😅

23 Dec 2022 at 1:42 | Open on infosec.exchange

minimoysmagician

@Natanael_L @Torfinn @EposVox You might be interested to hear about https://www.holochain.org/ (not a blockchain, to be clear, Holochain in itself has NO coin)
Straight from their homepage: 'Think BitTorrent + Git + Cryptographic Signatures'

Just spreading some information, if you have questions, I follow the project already quite some time

23 Apr 2023 at 7:48 | Open on tech.lgbt

Go Up