Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Natanael ⚠️

@Torfinn @EposVox that's not something you can solve with computer protocols, that's something you solve with human protocols. The closest thing is web of trust. Even with this approach you still only need git + replicated signatures from each peer reviewer + curators.

4 comments
Torfinn

@Natanael_L @EposVox you can’t solve for multiparty consensus with computer protocols 🤣 uh

Natanael ⚠️

@Torfinn @EposVox what you described is a social problem, the part computers can help with is propagating information but they can't make decisions about human peer review processes. They can only present a summary of concensus

Torfinn replied to Natanael

@Natanael_L @EposVox I definitely am not implying that the protocols should come to a consensus about the research itself 😅

minimoysmagician

@Natanael_L @Torfinn @EposVox You might be interested to hear about holochain.org/ (not a blockchain, to be clear, Holochain in itself has NO coin)
Straight from their homepage: 'Think BitTorrent + Git + Cryptographic Signatures'

Just spreading some information, if you have questions, I follow the project already quite some time

Go Up