|
Top-level
 I will not deny that there are problematic Fediverse servers that exist. You know what's funny? Most of them aren't using Mastodon. Instead they typically use Pleroma with a Rebased or Soapbox front-end. But that's neither here nor there because, yes, problematic Fediverse servers (including Mastodon) do indeed exist. When I see them, I report them on Fediblock -- and urge everyone else to de-federate. Most Fediverse server admins are doing more for community safety than Discord Inc. 8 comments
 @atomicpoet Everything old is new again... remembering 'communist' Linux and open source. The corporate class knows a threat to their business model when they see one. I assumed Mastodon would have moderation problems when I first joined. It's the best moderation I've ever seen. Vastly better than corporate platforms. @atomicpoet when it comes to discord. It depends on the server. Most of the time you going to run across a decent staff team. But everyonce in a blue moon. There will be a discord server that problematic. -a mod that tends to run strict rules for my servers and follow strict guidelines.  @atomicpoet Since they also bring up Reddit I assume they confuse decentralization with separate closed group forums. But then again those also exist on Facebook. @atomicpoet Does Pleroma has moderation tools equivalent to Mastodon? Perhaps it's a technical issue since those instances can scale big fast without breaking a sweat, making moderation far more crucial. @jbzfn Pleroma has even better moderation tools than Mastodon! Also, I run a Pleroma server at atomicpoet.org. See also: https://docs-develop.pleroma.social/backend/configuration/mrf/ |
Gregory's Server
The subtextual implication seems to be, "Decentralized services result in abusive trolls that aren't moderated."
Well, seeing how they're reporting on Discord as the vector of abuse, and Discord is *actually* centralized, that undermines their argument.
Twitter is the same way. And so is Instagram.
See a trend here?