Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
samir, talks too much

The number of people in my mentions saying, “you don’t hate Google, you hate capitalism”.

Now, I’m on Mastodon, so I can see why you would think that. But no.

Turns out capitalism does *not* require monopolistic practices. In fact, the world did capitalism for quite some time without encouraging those.

You can do capitalism and still punish overreach! Typically with laws, but taxes also work.

Capitalism does not mean “no taxes”. That’s just what the USA and UK would like you to believe.

26 comments
Caoilte O'Connor

@samir capitalism trends toward monopolies and rewards companies that behave badly (a race to the bottom where people say, "if I didn't do this someone else would"). We've been through similar periods before (eg the gilded age). Google's behaviour is natural and consistent with that order. But the accusation against you is a bit like saying you shouldn't hate a wife beater, you should hate the uncle that sexually abused him. It doesn't help anyone.

samir, talks too much

@caoilte I broadly agree with you. It seems to me that the core of it is people believing the capitalism is the goal, rather than one of several means.

Of course, this belief is put there by those who benefit from it (hi, Murdoch), who are using the reach afforded to them by capitalism. So perhaps it was always inevitable.

Caoilte O'Connor

@samir It's a very liberal sensibility to suppose that if we could just tweak capitalism a little bit everything would be okay and our privilege would be preserved. But it's getting harder and harder to pretend that we could even tweak capitalism a little bit and since the alternatives are too scary to think about we're paralysed in confusion.

tolortslubor

@samir @caoilte

Samir, curious about your answers:

What is “the goal”?

When, where and how did the world do capitalism without it trending toward corruption and monopoly?

Claudius Link

@samir
That is going to be an interesting discussion 😀

The thing I think is good in capitalism (but not tied to it) is decentralisation / locality.
There is no central authority to decide what is "produced", when, and in which quantities.
This enables experiments, adaption to needs without catastrophic failures if it doesn't work.

Monopolistic commercial conglomerates directly work against this

@samir
That is going to be an interesting discussion 😀

The thing I think is good in capitalism (but not tied to it) is decentralisation / locality.
There is no central authority to decide what is "produced", when, and in which quantities.
This enables experiments, adaption to needs without catastrophic failures if it doesn't work.

samir, talks too much

@realn2s Yes, I think it’s very good!

When you have several multinational, highly profitable corporations simultaneously conducting mass layoffs, I think it becomes clear that monopolies are failure states.

When you have capitalists taking advantage of discrepancies in fundamental human rights to create a market (e.g. cheap clothes made in terrible conditions), you’ve got a failure condition.

I think the core issue is capitalism as religion.

crasher35

@samir @realn2s A way to combat the monopolization of markets is with policies that foster the creation and growth of worker cooperatives and unions.

* Mergers are antithetical to unions
* More union power makes mergers more difficult leaving room in the market for competitors.
* Worker co-ops naturally splinter at scale leaving making their market dominance regional at best.

All of this works within a free market framework.

@samir @realn2s A way to combat the monopolization of markets is with policies that foster the creation and growth of worker cooperatives and unions.

* Mergers are antithetical to unions
* More union power makes mergers more difficult leaving room in the market for competitors.
* Worker co-ops naturally splinter at scale leaving making their market dominance regional at best.

crasher35

@samir @realn2s An example policy: In Italy, they have a policy where if a company lays off workers, those workers can get their unemployment payments as a lump sum and combine them to create a worker co-op.

Naturally, they'll likely be a competitor since that's what they know. They also have the social capital to be able to pull more talent that wasn't originally laid off from the original company.

Brendan Jones

@samir capitalism doesn’t require monopolies or low taxes, but it sure does tend towards them. Centralisation of business and individual wealth then acts on the political process to protect that wealth - like in the US and UK, as you noted.

tolortslubor

@Brendanjones @samir Brendan, so would you recommend using regulations to prohibit monopolies and encourage competition? Or ?

What about using tax structures to curb the risk of power abuses, while investing revenues in regulation and other pro-social programs, that encourage healthy competition and benefit all human society members?

Brendan Jones

@tolortslubor @samir I'm definitely for all those things. I would prefer a post-capitalist system but in the mean time I'll take making capitalism the best it can be.

Mobile Suit Golem

@samir the issue is the contradiction of Capitalisms inevitable tendency to monopolization, and the concentration of power being shifted to those with the most to benefit from the monopolization. Any attempt to stop the drift into monopolization will be hamstrung by those with power, since those attempts would be a direct challenge to their power and profit. I'd say the time it was doing it without the monopolies, it just hadn't reached that level yet.

John Hunter

@samir In fact "capitalism" explicitly notes that monopolistic practices must be guarded against (they are a danger to #capitalism working properly).

Monopolies and Oligopolies do not a Free Market Make

investing.curiouscatblog.net/2

#economics

RD

@curiouscat @samir

#capitalism is the religion of the god Capital.

While Capital is a human-created god that does not actually exist in physical form, nevertheless it is more real and powerful than any of humanity's other gods, it is truly the ruling god of this world and has assimilated all the others.

Capital has no problem with monopolies or oligopolies, quite the contrary: it is well served by them. It is also well served by having people distracted with conversations about policies, taxes, laws, monopolies, unions, etc etc, but never questioning foundational ideas like private property or state, never looking past all the assumptions capitalism has been programming us with for a few generations.

@curiouscat @samir

#capitalism is the religion of the god Capital.

While Capital is a human-created god that does not actually exist in physical form, nevertheless it is more real and powerful than any of humanity's other gods, it is truly the ruling god of this world and has assimilated all the others.

John Hunter

@RD4Anarchy @samir

I think you are arguing against the false claims about capitalism. From the link I included:

"The idea that businesses would try to suppress the free market (by gaining power that suppress competition) is not some new brilliant idea. At the creation of capitalist thought this was an obvious flaw in the practical application of free markets recognized by all. The government role was to assure that the market stayed very close to perfect competition...

Adam Smith, in..."

John Hunter

@RD4Anarchy @samir

Related: Political and Corporate Cronyism are not Capitalism
investing.curiouscatblog.net/2
"Pushing a political desire that anti-government and calling it capitalism doesn’t make it so. Capitalism at the core is about a system that allows markets to efficiently allocate resources to provide the greatest societal good. It is based on markets working. Capitalists know market players will try to prevent markets from working to gain themselves. To support #capitalism you need to...

@RD4Anarchy @samir

Related: Political and Corporate Cronyism are not Capitalism
investing.curiouscatblog.net/2
"Pushing a political desire that anti-government and calling it capitalism doesn’t make it so. Capitalism at the core is about a system that allows markets to efficiently allocate resources to provide the greatest societal good. It is based on markets working. Capitalists know market players will try to prevent markets...


@samir

Or drop the taxes so competition eliminates monopolies.

Paul Cantrell

@samir @shantini I agree very much with your underlying point here: what people call “capitalism” can mean a lot of things, leading in quite different directions.

In fact, it’s a word that means such wildly divergent things to different people — anything from “the belief that market effects exist at all“ to “the belief that pricing the dollar value of individual is a moral good“ — that I’ve become hesitant to even use the term without careful clarification of meaning.

Wille

@samir @shantini well functioning regulatory mechanisms to control & counteract monopolies and protect consumers from fraudulent behaviour and information assymetries are essential for functioning markets.

It’s baffling to me that few centre left- or right people get this.

Mike Fraser :Jets: :flag:

@samir A lot of people decry capitalism when they fully don't understand what it is. It has its problems for sure but those problems can be easily mitigated with proper regulation. The problem is often that modern political leaders lack the courage and conviction to properly regulate markets and bust monopolies. Also tax has become a dirty word. Taxation properly applied is part of a successful socio-economic architecture.

Guillaume Laurent

@samir that’s pretty silly of them, capitalism implies free entreprise, and that’s hard to have if there’s a monopoly in place in the domain you want to build your entreprise in.

Diane 🕵

@samir

I sometimes wonder if the EU will managed to spawn an EU aligned search engine.

The US, Russia, and China all have search tools aligned with their power structures, but the EU has mostly been tagging along with the US.

Anca Buit

@samir I know this is probably not the thing you want to argue.. but capitalism doesn't require monopolistic practices, but it does unevitably create monopolies or oligopolies as end result. (Before things come crashing down anyways.) Capitalism doesn't, on the whole, naturally allow for a truly open system, as something will capitalise on it, keeping it open requires effort.
All in on your criticisms on Google though. But also capitalism.

Pope Romule

@samir nah dude, capitalism absolutely means overreach and monopoly.

You can have markets without capitalism, but you can’t have capitalism without overreach and monopolies. Capitalism is only “capital (rich people) want to further grow their riches by exploiting labor and the market to maximize returns”

We’ve had monopolies for as long as we’ve had capitalism. They arguably started with wealthy companies realizing they could maximize their returns by convincing British royalty to give them exclusive rights to various things. That was done through what we would today call lobbying. Prices skyrocketed.

Standard oil didn’t become a monopoly because it started with all the oil, it did it by buying out competition, which is core to capitalism. It did it by selling under value to drive out competition, which is core to capitalism. If your only goal is to maximize returns, which is definitionally what capitalism is, then you have to lobby for government favor. You have to destroy competition. You have to destroy labor movements. You have to move as much manufacturing overseas as possible, and then keep those countries poor and underdeveloped on purpose to keep your labor prices low. You have to corner the market as much as possible, because to do anything else is to violate your mandate to maximize profits for owners and shareholders.

Capitalism requires lobbying to weaken regulation. It requires anticompetitive practices. It requires keeping workers in a position where they have as little power as possible so that you can keep wages low, it requires lobbying against minimum wage increases, lobbying against universal health care or free education, or rights to food or housing, because those things limit your ability to manipulate the labor market for your own profits.

If you don’t do these things then the board will replace you. If you don’t act in the most psychopathic ways possible then shareholders can actually sue.

That is what capitalism is. Capitalism isn’t “free markets.” Markets have existed for thousands of years, capitalism started with the East Indian trading company, which started all the gross bullshit.

The things you’re talking about hating about Google are the parts of Google that interface with capitalism.

@samir nah dude, capitalism absolutely means overreach and monopoly.

You can have markets without capitalism, but you can’t have capitalism without overreach and monopolies. Capitalism is only “capital (rich people) want to further grow their riches by exploiting labor and the market to maximize returns”

arkywarky

@samir i mean i agree with u on everything else, but capitalism does tend toward monopoly, bc that's how competition works...

Go Up