|
Top-level
 Yes, Big Social has more than enough money and tech to upset the Fediverse. What they don't have is the capacity to onboard knowledge about the Fediverse quickly and easily. This is because the actual inner workings of the Fediverse are held by only a small handful of people. 7 comments
The only way Big Social challenges the Fediverse is through small competing skunkworks projects. Which has actually happened with Jack Dorsey's Blue Sky project. And to be honest, I'm skeptical about Blue Sky for many reasons—which I may talk about in a separate thread. But more to the point, Blue Sky has been around for 4 years—and why aren't we using Blue Sky?  @atomicpoet They do not know how to extract money if they Federate too. That is what is holding up the Blue Sky development in my honest opinion. @atomicpoet @pre I am surprised that Blue Sky is this far behind after several years in development. I know ActivityPub was not built in a day, but at least there was progress being made over it’s development. I know there are other protocols around aspiring to do what ActivityPub has done, but most lack widespread adoption (basically having a million active users). @darnell @pre You know what I think is crazy, but awesome? How individuals folks are like, "You know what? I want to build something so I'm just going to make it happen." And they do it. I've been talking to a whole lot of devs like @dansup, @thatonecalculator, and @Are0h and they're doing more than a billionaire with paid staff at his disposal. |
Gregory's Server
Believe it or not, most people who work at Big Social are *not* social media nerds, and have zero interest in how the technology works.
When they look at Mastodon, their response is pretty much the same as everyone else's: they throw up their hands and say, "This is too complicated!"
And then they close their browser tab.