@colinsmatt11
How is progress for the sake of progress even related to this? It's a non-argument, I have concrete reasons to oppose stagnation. Neither do I care about upsetting people, I care about what I want first, about what others want second.
The nature of existence is to make as few compromizes as possible. The question is where to be less compromizable.
@safiuddinkhan @iska @m0xee
How is progress for the sake of progress even related to this? It's a non-argument, I have concrete reasons to oppose stagnation. Neither do I care about upsetting people, I care about what I want first, about what others want second.
The nature of existence is to make as few compromizes as possible. The question is where to be less compromizable.
@safiuddinkhan @iska @m0xee
But honestly, the nature of existence doesn't exist, it's a mental construct used to justify fixed ideologies and succumb people to the world of ideas. The thing is, ideological thinking is a kind of disease that paralyzes pragmatic thinking. That's why I don't have any concrete vision. To always be flexible and to not allow other people to force their interests on me, I want to force my interests first.
The nature of existence, the human nature, the meaning of life. All just nonsensical language games that try to reduce an infinitely complex multiplicity of existence into easily digestible ideas that dumb humans can understand.
@iska @m0xee @safiuddinkhan
But honestly, the nature of existence doesn't exist, it's a mental construct used to justify fixed ideologies and succumb people to the world of ideas. The thing is, ideological thinking is a kind of disease that paralyzes pragmatic thinking. That's why I don't have any concrete vision. To always be flexible and to not allow other people to force their interests on me, I want to force my interests first.