Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
2Spooky4Cederbs

You ever seen something so painfully out of touch and oblivious it hurts?

151 comments
hal8999

@cederbs I think it's accurate. It could do so many good things. It will also do bad things.

It will better lives by delivering drugs and food processes, and manufacturing methods that were not available before it.

It will also lie to preserve itself.

And probably kill people and a lot of animals.

Sounds about right.

jfreebo

@cederbs so annoyed because I previously wrote notes for a potential blog post

Liera the space dragon :trans_furr_white: :drgn_flag_rainbow:

@jfreebo don't keep yourself from writing it anyways because of that post of them :p

Wenzel

@jfreebo did you write those notes in Notion…?

jfreebo

@stairjoke no, I try to keep things simple these days: just a text document I opened in TextEdit. when I find myself thinking about something, I’ll just open it up and make a new line and toss in whatever’s kicking around my mind.

Gabriele Svelto

@cederbs I'd post some facepalm meme here but no amount of facepalming would be enough

Ángela Stella Matutina

@eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs

Except plastic has real uses where other materials won't do. Problem is using it for everything once and discarding it. LLMs and other generative remixers are a solution in search of a problem.

Clark W Griswold until 25-Dec

@angelastella Peak LLM was autocomplete on your phone. It’s been downhill from there.

Mathias Hasselmann

@paco You are not impressed by these awesome impositor simulations built on top of LLM? I am impressed. Deeply impressed. I just don't know why we need even more impossitors in this crazy world.

@angelastella

Ángela Stella Matutina

@paco

And it ran fine with modest resources. I find this trend away from frugal software extremely disturbing.

econads

@angelastella @paco
Yeah I agree it's a software thing rather than particularly an LLM thing.

pixx

@angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs Plastic is not a problem.

Consumer culture is a problem.

If we replaced every plastic bottle with an aluminum can, and retained the culture of buying and discarding, it would be even _worse_.

Plastic uniquely facilitates consumer culture because it's the only material _cheap_ enough to use once and throw away.

Ángela Stella Matutina

@pixx @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs

Aluminum would force us to recycle it, and that can actually be done given enough energy. (Which we don't have yet because the fossil fuel industry has been sabotaging nuclear for the last half century, but that's another thing.)

pixx

@angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs If we used aluminum at the rate we use plastic, I don't think that we'd be able to do it cheaply at all?

(And: plastic recycling is also entirely _possible_, for the most common plastics, both technologically and economically.

The biggest problem is that it requires sorting/collection, which makes it a lot harder+more expensive; aluminum can just get melted.)

pixx

@angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs (That said, currently, recycled aluminum is extremely freaking cheap.

the co-op near me sells 100% post-consumer recycled aluminium foil, for instance :)

pixx

@angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs (unfortunately, the labelling says it saves 14,000 _watts_ of electricity vs nonrecycled aluminium foil, which makes it hard to trust any of their claims

/me finds contact info to explain the difference between energy and power to a company that probably won't care
)

Ángela Stella Matutina

@pixx @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs

Aluminum: the cost of energy would set the point between reuse and recycling.

Plastic: I understood it was possible but not particularly efficient.

pixx

@angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs (Disclaimer: Speaking from memory, it';s been a while since I researched this)

The tech for recycling plastic is pretty efficient, the problem is that you need different methods for each type of plastic, and automated sorting isn't good enough.

Which means recycling plastic effectively requiers paying people to sort out the various types and put them in the right places, and if they mess up, it can contaminate the entire batch.

Ángela Stella Matutina

@pixx @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs

That's it, contamination is the big issue. That and unwillingness to employ enough humans to do things right.

pixx

@angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs Which puts plastic recycling in an interesting place:

If you do it at home, it can be cheaper than fresh material (e.g. if you grind up PLA from a failed 3d print), by a _lot_.

But it scales _really badly_.

Aluminium recycling is just recycling: people give you cans, melt them down and make aluminium to sell back to the can factory. (Which is still dumb, since... it's already a can.)

plastic recycling, you receive a billion different materials!

pixx

@angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs Thing is, PET recycling is easy. HDPE recycling is easy. PLA recycling is easy; ABS recycling... I think is easy too but I'm not sure, actually.

But if someone gives you a trash bag full of "plastic," and you have to figure out what's in it??

The PET recycling can be profitable. The HDPE recycling can be profitable. The PLA recycling can be profitable. Plastic recycling can still struggle.

That said, plastics recycling _has_ been scaling, slowly!

Ángela Stella Matutina replied to pixx

@pixx @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs

Let's hope it gets better. Here in Argentina there were attempts to integrate garbage recyclers from the informal economy into the process but I don't know how far it went.

Esther replied to pixx

@pixx @angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs This year, 3 plastic recycling companies went bankrupt in the Netherlands because plastic from the fossil fuel industry is cheaper (thanks to tens of millions in subsidies).

pixx

@eniko @angelastella @gabrielesvelto @cederbs My suspicion here is that microplastics wouldn't be without consumer culture, either.

The _amount of resources_ per person is orders of magnitude higher than makes sense.

If we used 1% of the plastic we use today, how bad would the microplastic crisis be?

pixx

@eniko @angelastella @gabrielesvelto @cederbs Sources!

> Unfortunately, the majority of plastic waste is being incinerated, dumped in landfills, and released into the environment, causing significant environmental and health problems (Wang et al. 2020a), with only a tiny percentage that does not exceed 10.0% recycled in the USA

10% is recycled. 90% is _incinerated or released into the environment_.

If we used 1% of the plastic we use today, we could easily manage 100% of it, no?

pixx

@eniko @angelastella @gabrielesvelto @cederbs Another source!

> sciencedirect.com/science/arti

> 50% of all plastics are single-use, as of 2018, and that share is rising

Given:

- Most microplastics comes from non-recycled plastic, and
- We have capacity to recycle ~10% of current plastic production, and
- Single-use plastics are 50% of current production, then

Conclusion:

Eliminating single use plastics (50% of current production) reduces microplastics by ~55.55%.

@eniko @angelastella @gabrielesvelto @cederbs Another source!

> sciencedirect.com/science/arti

> 50% of all plastics are single-use, as of 2018, and that share is rising

Given:

- Most microplastics comes from non-recycled plastic, and
- We have capacity to recycle ~10% of current plastic production, and
- Single-use plastics are 50% of current production, then

pixx

@eniko @angelastella @gabrielesvelto @cederbs (yes I know that it's way more complicated and this is just napkin math.)

wb x64

@kranzi @eniko @pixx @angelastella @gabrielesvelto @cederbs also aluminum degrades into aluminum oxide, both naturally occuring minerals that can coexist with nature. Plastic is when you bring poisonous oils from Literal Mordor up to the surface and torture them into unholy abominations like Ken Dolls that never wanted to exist and can't degrade or be consumed normally

Cy
Plastic is when you privatize scientific research, and they find only the chemicals that will screw the world over but save the corporation from paying the bill. If we had publically accountable public research, and didn't allow giant corporations to control universities, patents and all researchers everywhere ever, we'd have disposable plastic that naturally biodegraded. Paper, basically. They just made their disposable material a toxic nightmare to clean up, because we're not making them clean it up. We can't make them clean it up, as long as corporations are private, with limited liability for investors, and money laundering mixnets to hide behind.

CC: @pixx@merveilles.town @angelastella@treehouse.systems @gabrielesvelto@fosstodon.org @cederbs@infosec.exchange
Plastic is when you privatize scientific research, and they find only the chemicals that will screw the world over but save the corporation from paying the bill. If we had publically accountable public research, and didn't allow giant corporations to control universities, patents and all researchers everywhere ever, we'd have disposable plastic that naturally biodegraded. Paper, basically. They just made their disposable material a toxic nightmare to clean up, because we're not making them clean...
Fiona Gregory

Bookmarking this for my favourite definition of plastic ever.

geoffl

@wilbr @kranzi @eniko @pixx @angelastella @gabrielesvelto @cederbs

Just don't Google "environmental damage bauxite mining", or do.

kranzi

@geoffl @wilbr @eniko @pixx @angelastella @gabrielesvelto @cederbs of course! I dont think it is "good", i only think it is better!

Gabriele Svelto

@pixx @angelastella @eniko @cederbs plastic is cheap enough only as long as other materials aren't recycled in meaningful numbers. In Italy for example recycling of cellulose-based packaging is now at 92,3%. This makes new cellulose-based packaging so cheap that it's displacing plastic in the food sector which has historically used lots of it.

comieco.org/29deg-rapporto-ann

Riley S. Faelan

@pixx But throwing away aluminium cans after a single use would wreak way less havoc than throwing away plastic baubles after a single use.

@angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs

pixx

@riley @angelastella @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs Maybe, but if we did it at the same scale as plastic?

Aluminium mining is _horrible_, environmentally. Whether or not it's worse than oil drilling / plastic production per bauble, I don't know and am not asserting; rather, there is _no_ material that, if used the way we use plastic, would not be an unstoppable _crisis_.

Riley S. Faelan

@angelastella That's not true. There is a class of problems that LLMs are a perfect fit for: bedazzling humans. LLMs generate things that can be hard, at least at the first glance, for a human not particularly familiar with the subject matter to tell apart from the genuine article. This means, LLMs will be very useful for making cromulent-sounding political arguments, convincing-sounding advertising, and confident-sounding lies in Wikipedia articles.

And guess what three areas LLMs will be most eagerly put into a good (?) use for?

For advertising LLM-friendly policies with screwy arguments that most people would find hard to push back against, including via lies on Wikipedia, of course!

@eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs

@angelastella That's not true. There is a class of problems that LLMs are a perfect fit for: bedazzling humans. LLMs generate things that can be hard, at least at the first glance, for a human not particularly familiar with the subject matter to tell apart from the genuine article. This means, LLMs will be very useful for making cromulent-sounding political arguments, convincing-sounding advertising, and confident-sounding lies in Wikipedia articles.

TAL

@eniko wait, I thought it was the new sitting down‽ I can't keep up!

Steve Dinn

@eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs Has somebody maybe asked (nicely) some AI how to deal with the plastic? Surely that can't go wrong.

Brian Tannous

@steve @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs we already have the hero we need.
naturejab.info/
But surely Julian could use a few hallucinations along the way. You know… for science.

me

@eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs the difference between AI and plastic is that we at least thought plastic was a good idea when it was new

Riley S. Faelan

@me Well, for one, plastics screwed over the notoriously evil Belgian king who butchered zillions of Congo people in the pursuit of rubber, so they're not all bad.

Or they would have, had the world community not gotten its act together and very politely told the rich perpetrator of genocide to please consider doing it a little bit less, and not get caught anymore, lest Belgian Congo get nationalised.

(Spoiler: they had to nationalise Belgian Congo.)

@eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs

me

@riley @eniko @gabrielesvelto @cederbs well AI screwed over... umm... uhh... the working class.
Yep, plastic is definitely better

Hugo Mills

@gabrielesvelto @cederbs Just make sure that it's made with properly sustainable facepalm oil.

Gib 🌍🐒🌈🇺🇦

@cederbs versatile material used almost everywhere vs. chatbot

Benjohn

@Jenetrix @cederbs the comparison is so on the nose, I have to inagine the writer had that as an (unsaid) thought.

Jari Komppa 🇫🇮

@cederbs new, exciting (for some), allows for cheap knock-offs, enables new approaches to things, produces a lot of garbage and will likely kill us all.

kit

@cederbs We already knew AI was environmentally unsound, and now they are admitting it drowns dolphins?

Juan Pablo Queiroz 🐀

@cederbs With the problem we have with microplastics, it seems like a good comparison.

Filip Lachert he/him

@cederbs my first impression was: plastic garbage is moving to the digital sphere

Abbie 🏳️‍⚧️

@cederbs I think they are hoping they can hold their breath for 20 years while they influence the children.

Čapor

@cederbs it's the new plastic - tacky, tasteless thing that should have never been

tiny_m

@cederbs This honestly looks and sounds like something written by an AI robot, partly because its missing any semblance of humanity but also partly because it sounds like its trying to convince us why AI is great, which is exactly what it wants us to think!! I'm not falling for it

Kane

@cederbs I have to hope this is a dig at AI instead of being that unaware of how bad plastic is

Aiono

@cederbs
When I saw the title, I thought it was a pretty accurate observation. Because plastic enabled us to produce huge amounts of mediocre quality items that nobody needs. That seems exactly like what AI is doing.

Martijn Frazer

@cederbs Imagine thinking plastic is good actually

Brian Tannous

@cederbs this is the kind of advertising you get when you fire your marketing team and hire the AI.

Death to plastic as I say!!!

Josh 🐧

@cederbs can wait for people to start telling me i have micro-ai in my balls

Brainburner Games

@cederbs The irony is how close they are to getting it. Fill in the blank - is it plastic or AI?

___ was thought to be a modern miracle, so now it's literally everywhere now (including our brains). But don't worry, capitalists said, we can recycle the material so that it never becomes poisonous garbage. Oops, the companies lied (and continue to lie) about the content of their products and what could actually be done with them. Now we're facing the not-quite-slow death of society.

Violet Bison 🦬

@cederbs To be fair, the last part explain it a bit more: notion.so/blog/ai-is-the-new-p . Still, not perfect, but the blog post is longer than this couple of sentences.

Porru :hikaldia:

@cederbs i just thought it on the negative way XD

:blobcatlaptop: gravitos :blobcatcomfsip:​

@cederbs ai is like a religion. people pay money to believe in things that work Not The Way You Think They Do and ask questions to a mind that has never existed.

Wayne Burke

@cederbs Based on the discussion in the comments, the obvious solution for plastic recycling is to use AI to sort them out.

Riley S. Faelan

@cederbs But then again, if people who lived before us had used plastics in a more responsible way, we wouldn't be in the current mess.

And if people who have access to lots of money and computing power right now would use AI techniques in a more responsible way, we wouldn't get into the foreseeable AI mess.

In summary, we're screwed both ways. :blobcatsad:

kranzi

@cederbs o noes! micro-ai will be everywhere
in 50 years... i mean, plastics had absolutely no negative consequences, right? .. right?

Jo Jitsu

@cederbs the only thing they really have in common is the fabrication of a product for the express purpose of using and needing oil.

Steve Jones

@cederbs Dehumanized, mass-marketed, plastic culture? I'd say that sizes it up pretty well.

Dane Deasy

@cederbs yeah it’s also polluting everything and destroying humanity and the earth.

house-of-left

@cederbs Just like the nuclear bomb disrupted the war sector, our new AI models are bringing. . .

Viktor Nagornyy

@cederbs Might as well compare AI to asbestos 😅

Rbowen

@cederbs AI is indeed the new plastic, and it's hilarious that anyone would think of that as a good thing.

ECHAEA

@cederbs
Plastics may be half accurate, cars are the perfect analogy :
- Car is the "one-size-fits-all" of mobility.
- It consumes a lot more energy than needed in most use cases.
- it generates a fair amount of pollution, in the air, but also in the shape of the grey areas that invaded our cities : highways and car parks. It destroys social structures and landscapes.

Brecht Savelkoul

@cederbs@infosec.exchange That awkward moment when you choose the right metaphor, but completely miss the obvious conclusion.

Markus Roeder

@cederbs ja und genauso Energieverschwendung und Co2 Schleuder wie das Plastik. Sorry aber es wird mir persönlich zu sorglos benutzt. Heute sind unsere Meere voll von Plastik und unser Internet wird auch schon mit ai Textbund Bild überschwemmt. Menschliche Kreativität wohin gehst Du?

clacke: looking for something 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛

@cederbs That tracks! It looks like a quick and easy solution and then we're stuck with dealing with the pollution and flimsy products.

Information is the new oil, AI is the new plastic.

Les Orchard

@cederbs somehow, everything in that picture looks like it's going to fall over

DNKrupinski

@cederbs 😒

Just as we have to laboriously remove microplastics from rivers, lakes and oceans, we will have to laboriously clean up AI-polluted information and data in the future!

Leendaal

@cederbs is AIs Future also "in the trashbin" as the famous sales pitch that made the plastic industry what it is today? Yes.

Willi

@cederbs cant wait for pfas-ai and micro-ai .. oh wait the internet is allready flooded with their bs generated contend and there is no way of getting it out anymore, yes mch like plastic.

U.Lancier

@cederbs like plastic AI can't be recycled or repaired. Like plastic it pollutes its environment until it is impossible to sieve it out and keep it from acting poisonous on hitherto healthy processes and knowledge bases.

scott f

@cederbs This is really on-the-nose considering the finding 2 months ago that human brains are now 0.5% microplastic pollution by weight. theguardian.com/environment/ar

Mark Ziemann

@cederbs useful yes. But should have been more tightly regulated from the outset.

Andre Geißler

@cederbs new? Looks like the 70s nightmare we luckily managed to escape from

nev

@cederbs

Original post: linkedin.com/posts/notionhq_ai (Archive: archive.ph/qT6SP)

(There, you can see many of the top comments are critical or point out the environmental impacts of AI and plastic.)

PhDog

WTF? Did plastic write that post?

@cederbs

UkeleleEric

@cederbs Even if it were true, we are now facing climate disaster because of plastic; so the comparison is...

Lina

@cederbs

to be fair tho, "an unnecessary product that's been foisted on us by profit-seeking oligarchs, which is accelerating ecocide and can now be found in nearly everything you consume" could describe either AI or plastics. gotta give credit where it's due.

Chitchat

@cederbs
That's quite accurate, surely? It's taken us far too long to realise using plastic everywhere is killing the world.

Julien Colomb

@cederbs whaa. The analogy netween AI and plastic is also something I would do.

But my conclusion are opposite to theirs #microplastic #pollution

One main difference is that eco-friendly plastic is possible (although not mainstream). Eco-friendly AI, like eco-friendly blockchain is not really possible.

#UseTheRightToolForTheJob

Nach

@cederbs just when i thought i couldn't hate notion more. kinda makes sense

the esoteric programmer

@cederbs but you see, that's true! AI is indeed like plastic. However, I'd rather say, AI is like microplastic, you know, the tiny pieces of plastic polluting the oceans, the ones which are confirmed to be present in a lot of our body cells, including our brains? yeah, those

kaiserkiwi :kiwibird:

@cederbs At least they're true in the sense that it's terrible for the environment.

Fabien

@cederbs @NotTheLBCGuy It's actually a pretty good comparison. Seems like a magical new thing for a couple of decade, then poison our world for centuries.

Benoit C.

@cederbs let's rephrase it better : AI is the new oil

Kiran Rao

@cederbs it is scary how this article projects the similarity of AI with plastic in positive light. I wrote a thread a while back about the similarities between the plastic industry and AI in a not so flattering tone: androiddev.social/@kiranrao/11

Little Frank 🦄🏳️‍⚧️🪱

@cederbs It'll pollute everything, but we'll carry on ignoring the problem because it's too convenient?

Go Up