Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Jason's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
aburka 🫣
4 comments
Jonathan Gerhardson

@aburka @jalefkowit Note the wording. They are paying you to "lean blue:" and "make a voting plan." It probably falls under the same laws as paying someone to endorse your candidacy for office, which is not illegal afaik.

9 October at 5:58 | Open on newsie.social
Art Delano

@aburka @jalefkowit

(1) apologize for not voting last time, (2) walk us through a step-by-step plan of how they’d vote this time, and (3) post “Donald Trump is a human toilet” on social media

Technically they're neither paying people to vote nor to vote in a certain way; they're paying people to write a list of who they'd vote for if they voted. I suspect as long as there's no attempt at verifying whether they voted afterwards, the Cards Against Humanity PAC can claim there was no coercion.

I'm no lawyer though I can imagine an unfriendly court would not be particularly accommodating of how CAH interpreted the law.

@aburka @jalefkowit

(1) apologize for not voting last time, (2) walk us through a step-by-step plan of how they’d vote this time, and (3) post “Donald Trump is a human toilet” on social media

Technically they're neither paying people to vote nor to vote in a certain way; they're paying people to write a list of who they'd vote for if they voted. I suspect as long as there's no attempt at verifying whether they voted afterwards, the Cards Against Humanity PAC can claim there was no coercion.

9 October at 10:59 | Open on octodon.social
aburka 🫣

@ardgedee @jalefkowit yeahhh I'm staying away from this one, it's clearly against the spirit of the law and likely to feed into fascist narratives

9 October at 15:24 | Open on hachyderm.io
nil :demisexual_flag: (U) [!].7z

@aburka @jalefkowit they're technically paying people to make a post on social media, they aren't checking if you actually vote

9 October at 11:00 | Open on furry.engineer
Go Up