(1) apologize for not voting last time, (2) walk us through a step-by-step plan of how they’d vote this time, and (3) post “Donald Trump is a human toilet” on social media
Technically they're neither paying people to vote nor to vote in a certain way; they're paying people to write a list of who they'd vote for if they voted. I suspect as long as there's no attempt at verifying whether they voted afterwards, the Cards Against Humanity PAC can claim there was no coercion.
I'm no lawyer though I can imagine an unfriendly court would not be particularly accommodating of how CAH interpreted the law.
@ardgedee @jalefkowit yeahhh I'm staying away from this one, it's clearly against the spirit of the law and likely to feed into fascist narratives