@HunterZ @mttaggart @mwl notably, that one's not a country code
10 comments
@HunterZ @ireneista @mttaggart It's an arbitrary distinction for us. Not for IANA. They got a LOT of pain over .su's mishandling, and have institutional memory. I *hope* .io sticks around. I suspect past pain will drive the decision, however. @HunterZ @mttaggart @mwl it seems that way until you think about it the money for domain registrations - allegedly; we heard this from friends over the years but don't have a citation - went to the occupying military, not to the people that was never going to be a stable situation, and we should be glad that it's not @ireneista @HunterZ @mttaggart @mwl For handing over sovereignty, I have no objection. For disconnecting the .io TLD from any one country, I would have had no objection. But total removal, rather than simply making it a general use TLD, I find dickish. @mttaggart @ireneista @mos_8502 @mwl Creating TLDs associated with countries and then allowing domains to be registered with them that have nothing to do with those countries seems like an incredibly fraught framework. @HunterZ @mttaggart @mos_8502 @mwl oh definitely. it's a really strange thing to do in the first place. apparently there's quite a lot of money in it, which is why it happens....... @ireneista @HunterZ @mttaggart @mos_8502 @mwl some small nations actually make a decent amount of their GDP from their domain names. Like the Federated States of Micronesia's .fm, or Tuvalu's .tv, or I guess the infamous .tk (Tokelau) @ChartreuseK @HunterZ @mttaggart @mos_8502 @mwl it's quite a situation internet governance has gotten into, in that regard. we have no idea what the ideal state of things would be or how to move towards it ethically. |
@ireneista @mttaggart @mwl that's an arbitrary distinction from an end user standpoint, and also from the standpoint of most .io domain owners probably!