Gregory's Server|
This profile might be incomplete.
Open on infosec.exchange Taggart :donor:The Taggart Institute:
Twitch:
YouTube:
Contact infoWebsite:
GitHub:
Personal infoAbout:
Displaced Philly boy. Threat hunter. Streamer. Educator. #infosec, #programming #rust :rust:, #python :python: #haskell :haskell:, and #javascript :javascript:. #opensource advocate. Runs @thetaggartinstitute. Made https://wtfbins.wtf. Co-creator of https://github.com/mttaggart/OffensiveNotion. Not your bro. All opinions my own. Dad. #fedi22 #searchable Pronouns: He/him. M.Ed | Sec+ | CISSP | eCTHPv2 | eWPT | CRTO
Wall 5 posts
Who wants some good news? Last week I spoke to a middle school class about cybersecurity as a career, and AI came up. I asked if they had tried to use LLMs to do their schoolwork—they all had. But every student in the class said it didn't work. Why? "ChatGPT is too stupid." Kids are alright.
Show previous comments
@mttaggart also interesting is that the kids were smart enough to recognize how stupid it was. Many adults are not.
Show previous comments
  ONE QUIBBLE and this is not semantics: the "new owners" of the island are the indigenous people of those islands; many of them forcefully repatriated by the Brits. they are not new, nor owners. they are the peoples for whom those islands are their ancestral homeland. @mttaggart the funniest possible result is browser vendors implement a work-around and put IANA in the same dustbin as the W3C
Show previous comments
@mttaggart Honestly I don’t trust Google to run anything anymore, including even Gmail. The latter marked emails from its own registrar service as spam, lol https://daringfireball.net/linked/2023/06/16/google-domains  @mttaggart DNS is already federated! It just costs a little bit too much to get yourself a personal TLD. Yes, Google is allowing the creation of passkeys. No, Linux computers are not supported: |
There's more to this remedy than just the sell-off. Let's read some PDFs, gang.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25356126-doj-proposed-final-judgement-of-google-search-remedies
Google is prohibited from disincentivizing Apple from getting into the search game. That might seem weird, but many times during the case, Apple reps made clear that the Google deal was a set of handcuffs in this regard. With the arrival of Apple Intelligence, this opens the door to a new Apple search product.
Google can't acquire search competitors without prior consent from DoJ and Plaintiff States. So now's the time to innovate in the ad space, I guess?
Now, Android stuff.
Holy crap. So basically they need to allow you to remove Google search from Android. Indeed, later on in Section V, it is enumerated that no Google Search product or AI product can be "mandatory" in Android.
The strictures are worth reading in full. And if Google doesn't like it, Justice allows them to choose to divest of Android instead of complying!
There's more to this remedy than just the sell-off. Let's read some PDFs, gang.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25356126-doj-proposed-final-judgement-of-google-search-remedies
Google is prohibited from disincentivizing Apple from getting into the search game. That might seem weird, but many times during the case, Apple reps made clear that the Google deal was a set of handcuffs in this regard. With the arrival of Apple Intelligence, this opens the door to a new Apple search product.