Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Kevin Karhan :verified:

@dragonarchitect @nixCraft @gearlicious nodds in agreement

Also since "#AI" can't create copyrightable works it's unable to violate #copyright per very concept.

If #manpages and #documentation were good, we'd not need #StackOverflow butbthat's not the case so here we are...

11 comments
Gearlicious

@kkarhan @dragonarchitect @nixCraft yeah... it's an interesting conundrum. I still remember growing up around the days when it was nothing but ExpertsExchange (or ExpertSexChange depending on how you feel that day xD) littering Google search results with their paywalled answers. Come to think of it, mostly useless search results always have been.

Kevin Karhan :verified:

@gearlicious @dragonarchitect @nixCraft
Personally, I think #paywalling is antithetical to the concept of the #Internet.

If people want to make their shit #unsearchable and flex their #ableism and #classism, there's a tool for that:

It's called "limited edition #book prints"...

csgraves

@kkarhan @dragonarchitect @nixCraft @gearlicious that’s a weird thing then. So OpenAI can “generate” an image stolen from copyrighted material and you think it’s not infringement?
You tech people need to sit down and rethink your lives.

King Calyo Delphi

@csgraves @kkarhan @nixCraft @gearlicious Yeeahhhh... that's definitely not how copyright works. Just because the output of an AI or a photo taken by an animal isn't protected by copyright doesn't necessarily mean that it can't violate copyright, either.

King Calyo Delphi

@kkarhan @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious The way you phrased your own post made it sound like AI can't violate copyright because its own output isn't copyrightable.

That's not the case.

Kevin Karhan :verified:

@dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious both is true:

- "#AI" can't violate #copyright.
- #Scraping is not #CopyrightInfringement!
- Machine-generated output is not #copyrightable because it doesn't have a human author...
- If we deem #learning as copyright #infringement then we'd all be perpetual #DebtPeons to the #Contentmafia!

I do however condemn the #WastefulComputing for wannabe-"AI" that doesn't add anything meaningful to society and the world in general: Just like #NFTs and #Cryptocurrency-#Shitcoins!

@dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious both is true:

- "#AI" can't violate #copyright.
- #Scraping is not #CopyrightInfringement!
- Machine-generated output is not #copyrightable because it doesn't have a human author...
- If we deem #learning as copyright #infringement then we'd all be perpetual #DebtPeons to the #Contentmafia!

loganer

@kkarhan @dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious

indeed, AI is just a tool.
AI can't do copyright infringement but people can.
the natural conclusion is that you should go after the people who are using the tools for wrong and not wasting your time going after the tool.

if a group of people were committing murder with hammers, you'd go after the group of people and not hammers in general (at least I'd hope so).

Kevin Karhan :verified:

@loganer @dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious PRECISELY!

The person using it is at fault, that's why people face jailtime, not weapons!

-

What is sold as "#AI" isn't a sentient being but rather a stupid program.


-

Said program cannot be made liable nor has it any intention.


-

Like a car it won't be able to distinguish whether or not it"s running over an armed robber in self defense, a child on it's way to school because the driver is texting hits the curb because the driver has a heart attack...

@loganer @dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious PRECISELY!

The person using it is at fault, that's why people face jailtime, not weapons!

-

What is sold as "#AI" isn't a sentient being but rather a stupid program.


-

Said program cannot be made liable nor has it any intention.

loganer

@kkarhan @dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious and if you think of it, llm isn't all that different from cryptography in how it functions.

the only major different really being that we've adjusted the parameters to produce a somewhat useable output instead of complete pseudorandomness.

different end goals but fundementally the same principles applied.

Kevin Karhan :verified:

@csgraves @dragonarchitect @nixCraft @gearlicious no, you need to go to law school and actually check the #facts:

No #Copyright-able works can be generated without #Authorship and a machine isn't a natural #person, thus can't be an #author.

Also if we think all #learning is #CopyrightInfringement, then we all are #DebtPeons to the #Copyrightmafia starting the moment we read or consume any media, including #Schoolbooks!

felixreda.eu/2021/07/github-co

Not that I'd call it "#AI" for what is essentially a #shitposting #Chatbot nor that I defend the #WastefulComputing done for that #BuzzwordDrivenDevelopment...

Cuz that's a #NuancedOpinion...

@csgraves @dragonarchitect @nixCraft @gearlicious no, you need to go to law school and actually check the #facts:

No #Copyright-able works can be generated without #Authorship and a machine isn't a natural #person, thus can't be an #author.

Also if we think all #learning is #CopyrightInfringement, then we all are #DebtPeons to the #Copyrightmafia starting the moment we read or consume any media, including #Schoolbooks!

Go Up