@kkarhan @dragonarchitect @nixCraft @gearlicious that’s a weird thing then. So OpenAI can “generate” an image stolen from copyrighted material and you think it’s not infringement?
You tech people need to sit down and rethink your lives.
Top-level
@kkarhan @dragonarchitect @nixCraft @gearlicious that’s a weird thing then. So OpenAI can “generate” an image stolen from copyrighted material and you think it’s not infringement? 8 comments
@kkarhan @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious The way you phrased your own post made it sound like AI can't violate copyright because its own output isn't copyrightable. That's not the case. @kkarhan @dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious indeed, AI is just a tool. if a group of people were committing murder with hammers, you'd go after the group of people and not hammers in general (at least I'd hope so). @kkarhan @dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious and if you think of it, llm isn't all that different from cryptography in how it functions. the only major different really being that we've adjusted the parameters to produce a somewhat useable output instead of complete pseudorandomness. different end goals but fundementally the same principles applied. |
@csgraves @kkarhan @nixCraft @gearlicious Yeeahhhh... that's definitely not how copyright works. Just because the output of an AI or a photo taken by an animal isn't protected by copyright doesn't necessarily mean that it can't violate copyright, either.