Gregory's Server
@kkarhan @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious The way you phrased your own post made it sound like AI can't violate copyright because its own output isn't copyrightable.
That's not the case.
|
4 comments
 @kkarhan @dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious indeed, AI is just a tool. if a group of people were committing murder with hammers, you'd go after the group of people and not hammers in general (at least I'd hope so). @kkarhan @dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious and if you think of it, llm isn't all that different from cryptography in how it functions. the only major different really being that we've adjusted the parameters to produce a somewhat useable output instead of complete pseudorandomness. different end goals but fundementally the same principles applied. |
@dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious both is true:
- "#AI" can't violate #copyright.
- #Scraping is not #CopyrightInfringement!
- Machine-generated output is not #copyrightable because it doesn't have a human author...
- If we deem #learning as copyright #infringement then we'd all be perpetual #DebtPeons to the #Contentmafia!
I do however condemn the #WastefulComputing for wannabe-"AI" that doesn't add anything meaningful to society and the world in general: Just like #NFTs and #Cryptocurrency-#Shitcoins!
@dragonarchitect @csgraves @nixCraft @gearlicious both is true:
- "#AI" can't violate #copyright.
- #Scraping is not #CopyrightInfringement!
- Machine-generated output is not #copyrightable because it doesn't have a human author...
- If we deem #learning as copyright #infringement then we'd all be perpetual #DebtPeons to the #Contentmafia!