Gregory's ServerOn FDO's conduct enforcement actions regarding Vaxry
https://drewdevault.com/2024/04/09/2024-04-09-FDO-conduct-enforcement.html
Drew DeVault
11 comments
 
🐧sima🐧
@drewdevault boosted, since it avoids me having to type up something only thing to add really is that the x.org leadership committee has oversight over all things fd.o and serves as appeal body for any decisions by the code of conduct team. maybe for a future case where things are less clear than here https://www.x.org/wiki/XorgFoundation/Policies/Hosting/
Alex
@drewdevault so this whole fuss because FDO exercises to expand their policy enforcement beyond jurisdiction. That's not how it works dude. 
Graham Sutherland / Polynomial
@drewdevault the tone of his writing alone made it immediately obvious to me that he's a complete douchenozzle and should be kept well clear of any community, let alone in a position of authority. 
The Mad Hatter
@drewdevault Vaxry seems like someone who does not understand Poppers Paradox of tolerance |
@drewdevault
"Regardless of how you feel about the conduct team issuing a private warning to Vaxry on the basis of activities outside of FDO community spaces, the email thread that ensues most certainly is within the scope of the FDO code of conduct, and Vaxry’s behavior therein is sufficient justification for a ban from the FDO community as far as I’m concerned."
Assuming good faith on the part of the initiator of the email thread, I agree with this.