Gregory's Server@mok0
Collective ownership is not akin to private ownership in any way. In Anarcho-Communism, the emphasis is on abolishing private property and establishing collective ownership where the means of production are owned and managed collectively by the community without the need for a governing authority or state intervention. Private ownership perpetuates inequality and exploitation, whereas collective ownership promotes solidarity and equitable distribution of resources.
|
Top-level
6 comments
@Radical_EgoCom Collective means of productions are privately owned by the community as a whole. That is, nobody outside the community has ownership or is involved in running the enterprise. @Radical_EgoCom Because there is a clear difference to government ownership, seen under Communism, where the state is the owner of all enterprises. The state represented by the government inserts the board of directors and runs the enterprise which in practice means that top level party apparatchiks reap the profits and benefits for themselves and workers are exploited with low pay and poor working conditions. |
@Radical_EgoCom Yes exactly so it's privately owned by the community.