Gregory's Server@Radical_EgoCom Yes exactly so it's privately owned by the community.
|
5 comments
@Radical_EgoCom Collective means of productions are privately owned by the community as a whole. That is, nobody outside the community has ownership or is involved in running the enterprise. @Radical_EgoCom Because there is a clear difference to government ownership, seen under Communism, where the state is the owner of all enterprises. The state represented by the government inserts the board of directors and runs the enterprise which in practice means that top level party apparatchiks reap the profits and benefits for themselves and workers are exploited with low pay and poor working conditions. |
@mok0
Anarcho-Communism opposes private ownership of the means of production, even if it's by the community. Anarcho-Communism advocate for resources to be shared and managed collectively by the people themselves, rather than being owned privately, even if by the community as a whole.