Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
14 posts total
L. Rhodes

"Reverse chron IS an algorithm."

Yes, but even more than that, we're all of us making our own custom algorithms by the way we arrange our accounts. The software and services we use provide us with particular tools for doing so. Reverse chron and follow are the basic underlying tools, but there's also block account, block domain, mute account, mute word, follow hashtag, mute replies from this account, and so on. Even choosing a host instance can be a means of shaping your algorithm.

L. Rhodes

"Great Andamanese, it turns out, is exceptional among the world's languages in its anthropocentrism. […] Because no other known language has a grammar based on the human body or shares cognates […] with Great Andamanese, the language constitutes its own family." scientificamerican.com/article #language #linguistics #India

L. Rhodes

Been daydreaming about a modular ActivityPub implementation. Each instance could decide which service types to offer, and each account could decide which to use. Accounts are held at the TLD level, services on subdomains.

So maybe foo.bar offers micro.foo.bar, photo.foo.bar and checkin.foo.bar. You have a foo.bar account, but only connect to micro.foo.bar and photo.foo.bar. And I only follow you on photo.foo.bar.

Don't know how feasible that is with AP.

L. Rhodes

That maybe seems a little complicated from a UX perspective, but I think it could be made relatively seamless. There could be a standard post form, and the service/subdomain you're using changes depending on what options you invoke. Clicking "add image," for example, switches you over to photo.foo.bar. But the option to add image only shows up on your form if you connected to the photo service. Which would be a relatively straightfoward toggle in your account settings — if foo.bar offers photo.

L. Rhodes

These are my attempt at a few fast-and-sloppy diagrams illustrating how #Mastodon and #bluesky handle two kinds of message, both in the simplest scenario and in the more complicated conditions they'll both operate under when Bluesky goes into full production. Part of the point here is that the beta obscures some of the major differences between them. Seeing how Bluesky is intended to operate according to the spec makes it easier to assess its implication.

L. Rhodes

Looking at the differences between multi-server fediverse relations and multi-server Bluesky relations ought to make it easier to see why Bluesky couldn't just lift Mastdon's moderation solutions wholesale. And it opens up a bundle of questions about how federation and moderation work on the Bluesky network that probably won't be clear outside of the company until the beta ends and third parties start federating their own servers into the network.

L. Rhodes

If you're attracted to Bluesky by the promise of account portability, then I think it's important to understand what that entails. Because one of the claims they're making is that you'll be able to rescue your account in the event that your home server suddenly closes. But how would that work? How do you migrate an account from a server that's no longer accessible? And part of the answer has to be: Well, you don't. Because it lives somewhere else. 🧵 1/?

L. Rhodes

The first thing to understand is that BlueSky servers aren't entirely analogous to fediverse servers. The protocol docs call them Personal Data Servers (PDS), and they handle only a portion of what fediverse servers would handle. Mostly they deliver personal interactions between accounts—"small-world" networking, in the jargon. The rest of your account—your network identity, really—is stored elsewhere. That has implications you should really pay attention to if you're thinking of joining.

L. Rhodes

Some interesting discussion here about using Mastodon to build server-specific funding programs for artists and writers: mstdn.social/@Jonathanglick/11

The potentials being discussed are due in no small part to the fact that we're not all on one big server, and can more easily build communities of alignment by leaning on the soft borders created by decentralizing social media across multiple servers, each with their own identity.

L. Rhodes

Here's the latest Mastodon development roadmap: blog.joinmastodon.org/2021/12/

Some interesting stuff in here, like reply controls, dynamic roles, and groups potentially replacing (or only supplementing?) the local timeline. Seems like some items have already been implemented in v4, though—like batch filter rules and post editing.

Show previous comments
Anders Thoresson

@lrhodes The group feature sound interesting for sure!

Osma A

edit: ah, the roadmap is from a year ago

conspicuously missing from the Mastodon roadmap: making lists actually usable

- architecture (add to list without following on home timeline)
- function (curated, public lists)
- usability (current list management UI is terrible)

obviously very large conceptual overlap with what a group might be

also missing: any thinking of how discovery and search really are needed functionality

blog.joinmastodon.org/2021/12/

edit: ah, the roadmap is from a year ago

conspicuously missing from the Mastodon roadmap: making lists actually usable

- architecture (add to list without following on home timeline)
- function (curated, public lists)
- usability (current list management UI is terrible)

obviously very large conceptual overlap with what a group might be

L. Rhodes

A couple of people have pointed out that this page is a year old. Sorry for the mix up. It popped up in my RSS feed this morning, so I glossed right over the publication date at the bottom of the page.

L. Rhodes

Make fun of John Mastodon all you want, but he gave an unflinching, nuanced performance in Goncharov (1973).

L. Rhodes

In the past, I've had accounts that crossposted to Twitter, but I've ultimately either disconnected the crossposting or let the accounts go defunct. And gradually I've come to the conclusion that crossposting undermines the goal of building a better social media ecosystem. It provides people with an excuse for staying on corporate social media and encourages them to see it as your responsibility to deliver your posts to them wherever they already have an account.

L. Rhodes

I'm not saying never crosspost. I'm willing to grant that there are probably some circumstances in which a limited degree of automated crossposting makes sense. But if your goal is to encourage people to migrate to a healthier social media environment, then it makes sense to be very thoughtful and restrained about how you mirror posts from one platform to another. And I don't think we're thoughtful enough about it. I certainly wasn't.

Tendigits

@lrhodes I agree. My current approach is to have specific and very limited accounts on corporate platforms for communicating with the people who use them (very specific to topic interests). By having a website and pointing to it as my "home" anyone interested in deeper connections can dig further and see how much more beyond the surface there is.
Maybe it's counter-productive, but I create original posts on these platforms (not automated), and only when I feel like it.

swansinflight :excuseme:

@lrhodes so much this, honestly.

People need to commit or it never works. Because maybe at the root of it... we don't all need social media.

L. Rhodes

The threshold for discoverability on Mastodon is pretty high, so be generous about boosting other people. Sometimes you're the signal, and sometimes you're the path the signal takes through the noise.

Tim Chambers

@lrhodes This I think is a feature of #Mastodon, not a bug. And good advice.

L. Rhodes

Maybe it's just my group, but a lesson I'm steadily learning is:

If you've given your NPC a name, and you want your players to know it, introduce it early, because they absolutely will not ask what it is.

L. Rhodes

The enlightened GM way to see it is:

They're looking to you for cues as to which NPCs are significant enough to bother learning about, and providing a name upfront is a clear gesture in that direction.

L. Rhodes

When I start to doubt my decision to buy an e-reader:

Go Up